{"title":"La Nueva Filosofía de Oliva y Miguel Sabuco [The New Philosophy of Oliva and Miguel Sabuco]","authors":"J. Fernández","doi":"10.18239/ENSAYOS.V27I0.245","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Resumen: El presente articulo replantea el problema de la autoria de la Nueva filosofia de la naturaleza del hombre de una manera novedosa: desde el contenido de la obra. Buscando resolver el problema de la ambiguedad y contradicciones de la misma, propone la hipotesis de que a Miguel Sabuco corresponderia la parte fisiologica y psicosomatica, mientras que Oliva Sabuco habria dotado a esta de una arquitectura filosofica espanola renacentista, socratica cristiana, erasmista y neoestoica. Abstract: The current article again arises the issue of the authorship of the New Philosophy of Man’s Nature in a novel way: from the content of the play. Trying to solve the problem of its ambiguity and contradictions a new hypothesis is proposed here, that Miguel Sabuco is the author of the physiological and psychosomatic part whereas Oliva Sabuco would have provided it with a Renaissance Spanish philosophical architecture, which at the same time is Socratic-Christian, Erasmist and Neoestoic.","PeriodicalId":42950,"journal":{"name":"Ensayos-Revista de la Facultad de Educacion de Albacete","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2012-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ensayos-Revista de la Facultad de Educacion de Albacete","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18239/ENSAYOS.V27I0.245","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Resumen: El presente articulo replantea el problema de la autoria de la Nueva filosofia de la naturaleza del hombre de una manera novedosa: desde el contenido de la obra. Buscando resolver el problema de la ambiguedad y contradicciones de la misma, propone la hipotesis de que a Miguel Sabuco corresponderia la parte fisiologica y psicosomatica, mientras que Oliva Sabuco habria dotado a esta de una arquitectura filosofica espanola renacentista, socratica cristiana, erasmista y neoestoica. Abstract: The current article again arises the issue of the authorship of the New Philosophy of Man’s Nature in a novel way: from the content of the play. Trying to solve the problem of its ambiguity and contradictions a new hypothesis is proposed here, that Miguel Sabuco is the author of the physiological and psychosomatic part whereas Oliva Sabuco would have provided it with a Renaissance Spanish philosophical architecture, which at the same time is Socratic-Christian, Erasmist and Neoestoic.
个人资料:关于重新种植的具体问题，关于重新种植的问题，关于重新种植的问题，关于重新种植的问题，关于重新种植的问题，关于重新种植的问题，关于重新种植的问题，关于重新种植的问题，关于重新种植的问题。在解析器el问题de la ambiguedad y contradicciones de la堂吉诃德,倡言la hipotesis德,米格尔Sabuco corresponderia拉杰克逊fisiologica y psicosomatica mientras,奥利瓦Sabuco habria dotado斯塔de una arquitectura filosofica西班牙renacentista socratica cristiana, erasmista y neoestoica。摘要:本文以一种新颖的方式——从该剧的内容出发，再次提出了《人的本性新哲学》的作者问题。为了解决模棱两可和矛盾的问题这里提出了一个新的假设，米格尔·萨布科是生理和身心部分的作者而奥利瓦·萨布科会为它提供一个文艺复兴时期的西班牙哲学建筑，同时也是苏格拉底-基督教，伊拉斯谟和新古典主义的。
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
