Pollution Haven and Corruption Paradise

F. Candau, E. Dienesch
{"title":"Pollution Haven and Corruption Paradise","authors":"F. Candau, E. Dienesch","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1864170","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we present a simple theoretical extension from the Economic Geography literature to characterize the main features of pollution havens (lax environmental regulation, good market access to high-income countries and corruption opportunities). Using structural and reduced-form estimations, we find that pollution havens are not a “popular myth” for European firms, laxer environmental standards significantly explain the location choice of polluting affiliates. We analyze in depth the role of trade costs (using various bilateral and multilateral measures), a 1% increase in access to the European market from a pollution haven fosters relocation there by 0.1%. We also find that corruption lowers environmental standards, which strongly attract polluting firms: a 1% increase of corruption fuels relocation by 0.28%. We test the economic significance of these empirical findings via simulations. The protection of the European market (e.g., a carbon tax on imports) to stop relocations to pollution havens must be high (a decrease of the European market for Morocco and Tunisia equivalent to 13%) not to say prohibitive (31% for China).","PeriodicalId":36243,"journal":{"name":"Review of Economic Research on Copyright Issues","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2139/ssrn.1864170","citationCount":"131","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Economic Research on Copyright Issues","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1864170","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 131

Abstract

In this paper, we present a simple theoretical extension from the Economic Geography literature to characterize the main features of pollution havens (lax environmental regulation, good market access to high-income countries and corruption opportunities). Using structural and reduced-form estimations, we find that pollution havens are not a “popular myth” for European firms, laxer environmental standards significantly explain the location choice of polluting affiliates. We analyze in depth the role of trade costs (using various bilateral and multilateral measures), a 1% increase in access to the European market from a pollution haven fosters relocation there by 0.1%. We also find that corruption lowers environmental standards, which strongly attract polluting firms: a 1% increase of corruption fuels relocation by 0.28%. We test the economic significance of these empirical findings via simulations. The protection of the European market (e.g., a carbon tax on imports) to stop relocations to pollution havens must be high (a decrease of the European market for Morocco and Tunisia equivalent to 13%) not to say prohibitive (31% for China).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
污染天堂和腐败天堂
在本文中,我们从经济地理学文献中提出了一个简单的理论扩展,以表征污染天堂的主要特征(宽松的环境监管,高收入国家的良好市场准入和腐败机会)。通过结构和简化形式的估计,我们发现污染天堂对欧洲企业来说并不是一个“流行的神话”,更宽松的环境标准显著地解释了污染子公司的地点选择。我们深入分析了贸易成本的作用(使用各种双边和多边措施),从污染天堂进入欧洲市场的机会每增加1%,就会促进0.1%的迁移。我们还发现,腐败降低了环境标准,这强烈地吸引了污染企业:腐败每增加1%,就会推动0.28%的搬迁。我们通过模拟来检验这些实证发现的经济意义。对欧洲市场的保护(例如,对进口征收碳税)必须很高(摩洛哥和突尼斯的欧洲市场减少了13%),而不是说令人望而却步(中国减少了31%)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Pollution Haven and Corruption Paradise Loss Aversion and Gain Appetite in the Small and in the Large Vertical Differentiation and Labour in a General Equilibrium Model Intellectual Property Law Harmonization within and Beyond Europe: Achievements and Future Challenges Language, Copyright and Geographic Segmentation in the EU Digital, Single Market for Music and Film
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1