Retrograde endoscopic assisted percutaneous treatment of urinary fistulas after partial nephrectomy

IF 0.1 Q4 ONCOLOGY Onkourologiya Pub Date : 2021-07-25 DOI:10.17650/1726-9776-2021-17-2-128-138
B. Guliev, E. I. Korol, Zh. P. Avazkhanov, K. Yakubov, M. Agagyulov, A. Talyshinskiy
{"title":"Retrograde endoscopic assisted percutaneous treatment of urinary fistulas after partial nephrectomy","authors":"B. Guliev, E. I. Korol, Zh. P. Avazkhanov, K. Yakubov, M. Agagyulov, A. Talyshinskiy","doi":"10.17650/1726-9776-2021-17-2-128-138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background. Urinary fistulas (UFs) are one of the most significant complications after partial nephrectomy. Placement of an ureteral stent eliminates urine extravasation in the majority of patients. However, some of them have persistent UFs despite upper urinary tract drainage. Such cases require retrograde injection of fibrin glue into the renal cavity through a ureteroscope or via the percutaneous approach. Some authors reported cases of simultaneous use of 2 stents and percutaneous cryoablation of the fistula, but these techniques are rare and, therefore, it is problematic to evaluate their efficacy.Objective: to evaluate the results of the new treatment method for the elimination of persistent UFs using the retrograde endoscopic percutaneous approach.Materials and methods. This study included 5 patients (3 males and 3 females) with UFs developed after kidney resection. Mean age of the patients was 55.8 years. The tumor size was 2.5 to 4.8 cm; mean R.E.N.A.L. score was 7.8. All patients had earlier undergone minimally invasive partial nephrectomy; the time between surgery and UF development varied between 3 and 10 days. Four out of 5 patients had a large amount of discharge from their paranephral drainage system, examination of which confirmed high creatinine level. Patients underwent flexible ureteropyelography in the lithotomy position. During this procedure, we identified the damaged calyx and then performed percutaneous puncture targeting the distal end of the endoscope at this calyx, ensuring that the tip of the needle appeared in the paranephral cavity in front of the injured calyx. Using the flexible ureteroscope, we inserted the needle into the pelvis, dilated the puncture opening along the string, and installed a nephrostomy drainage system (12 Fr). Then the endoscope was removed and the ureter was additionally drained with a stent. The stent was removed after 8-10 days with subsequent antegrade pyelography. If there was no extravasation, the nephrostomy tube was removed and the patient was discharged from hospital to continue treatment in outpatient settings.Results. All patients with UFs resulting from partial nephrectomy was successfully operated on. No complications were registered. The mean surgery time was 45.0 ± 20.5 min (range: 40-65 min). Only two patients had some discharge from the fistula within 1 day after nephrostomy tube removal and it stopped without any additional interventions. Three patients had their fistula healed immediately. The treatment efficacy during the whole follow-up period of 18 ± 4 months (range: 6-26 months) was 100 %.Conclusion. Ureteral stenting ensures elimination of UFs in the majority of patients after partial nephrectomy. In individuals with persistent UFs, retrograde endoscopic percutaneous drainage of the pelvicalyceal system is the method of choice, because it allows rapid and effective treatment of UFs.","PeriodicalId":42924,"journal":{"name":"Onkourologiya","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Onkourologiya","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17650/1726-9776-2021-17-2-128-138","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background. Urinary fistulas (UFs) are one of the most significant complications after partial nephrectomy. Placement of an ureteral stent eliminates urine extravasation in the majority of patients. However, some of them have persistent UFs despite upper urinary tract drainage. Such cases require retrograde injection of fibrin glue into the renal cavity through a ureteroscope or via the percutaneous approach. Some authors reported cases of simultaneous use of 2 stents and percutaneous cryoablation of the fistula, but these techniques are rare and, therefore, it is problematic to evaluate their efficacy.Objective: to evaluate the results of the new treatment method for the elimination of persistent UFs using the retrograde endoscopic percutaneous approach.Materials and methods. This study included 5 patients (3 males and 3 females) with UFs developed after kidney resection. Mean age of the patients was 55.8 years. The tumor size was 2.5 to 4.8 cm; mean R.E.N.A.L. score was 7.8. All patients had earlier undergone minimally invasive partial nephrectomy; the time between surgery and UF development varied between 3 and 10 days. Four out of 5 patients had a large amount of discharge from their paranephral drainage system, examination of which confirmed high creatinine level. Patients underwent flexible ureteropyelography in the lithotomy position. During this procedure, we identified the damaged calyx and then performed percutaneous puncture targeting the distal end of the endoscope at this calyx, ensuring that the tip of the needle appeared in the paranephral cavity in front of the injured calyx. Using the flexible ureteroscope, we inserted the needle into the pelvis, dilated the puncture opening along the string, and installed a nephrostomy drainage system (12 Fr). Then the endoscope was removed and the ureter was additionally drained with a stent. The stent was removed after 8-10 days with subsequent antegrade pyelography. If there was no extravasation, the nephrostomy tube was removed and the patient was discharged from hospital to continue treatment in outpatient settings.Results. All patients with UFs resulting from partial nephrectomy was successfully operated on. No complications were registered. The mean surgery time was 45.0 ± 20.5 min (range: 40-65 min). Only two patients had some discharge from the fistula within 1 day after nephrostomy tube removal and it stopped without any additional interventions. Three patients had their fistula healed immediately. The treatment efficacy during the whole follow-up period of 18 ± 4 months (range: 6-26 months) was 100 %.Conclusion. Ureteral stenting ensures elimination of UFs in the majority of patients after partial nephrectomy. In individuals with persistent UFs, retrograde endoscopic percutaneous drainage of the pelvicalyceal system is the method of choice, because it allows rapid and effective treatment of UFs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
逆行内镜下经皮治疗肾部分切除术后尿瘘
背景。尿瘘是肾部分切除术后最重要的并发症之一。输尿管支架的放置消除了大多数患者的尿液外渗。然而,尽管有上尿路引流,他们中的一些人仍有持续的UFs。此类病例需要通过输尿管镜或经皮入路向肾腔内逆行注射纤维蛋白胶。一些作者报道了同时使用2个支架和经皮冷冻消融瘘管的病例,但这些技术很少见,因此评估其疗效是有问题的。目的:评价经皮内镜逆行入路治疗持续性UFs的新方法的效果。材料和方法。本研究包括5例肾切除术后发生UFs的患者(3男3女)。患者平均年龄55.8岁。肿瘤大小2.5 ~ 4.8 cm;平均r.e.n.l.评分为7.8分。所有患者早期均行微创部分肾切除术;手术和UF发展之间的时间从3天到10天不等。5例患者中有4例肾旁引流系统有大量分泌物,检查证实肌酐水平高。患者在取石位行输尿管镜术。在此过程中,我们确定受损的肾盏,然后将内窥镜远端对准该肾盏进行经皮穿刺,确保针尖出现在受损肾盏前的肾旁腔内。使用输尿管镜,我们将针插入骨盆,沿着线扩张穿刺口,并安装肾造口引流系统(12 Fr)。然后取出内窥镜,并用支架引流输尿管。8-10天后取出支架并进行顺行肾盂造影。如果没有外渗,则拔除肾造瘘管,患者出院,继续在门诊治疗。所有肾部分切除术后的UFs患者均成功手术。无并发症记录。平均手术时间45.0±20.5 min(范围40 ~ 65 min)。只有2例患者在肾造口管拔除后1天内出现瘘道排出物,并在没有任何其他干预的情况下停止。3例患者的瘘管立即愈合。随访18±4个月(6 ~ 26个月),治疗有效率为100%。输尿管支架植入术可确保大多数肾部分切除术后患者消除UFs。对于持续性UFs患者,盆骨系统逆行经皮内窥镜引流是首选方法,因为它可以快速有效地治疗UFs。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Onkourologiya
Onkourologiya ONCOLOGY-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
59
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: The main objective of the journal "Cancer urology" is publishing up-to-date information about scientific clinical researches, diagnostics, treatment of oncologic urological diseases. The aim of the edition is to inform the experts on oncologic urology about achievements in this area, to build understanding of the necessary integrated interdisciplinary approach in therapy, alongside with urologists, combining efforts of doctors of various specialties (cardiologists, pediatricians, chemotherapeutists et al.), to contribute to raising the effectiveness of oncologic patients’ treatment.
期刊最新文献
Review of the article “Comparison of clips and electrosurgical instruments in sealing of lymphatic vessels during pelvic lymph node dissection at the time of radical cystectomy” Transurethral resection of bladder cancer involving the orifice of the ureter Retrograde endoscopic assisted percutaneous treatment of urinary fistulas after partial nephrectomy Review of the article “Laparoscopic single port radical nephrectomy challenges: a case presentation” Technique and short-term outcomes of surgical treatment in patients with renal cell carcinoma and tumor venous thrombosis: experience of the Urology Clinic, N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1