The first experience of transperineal prostate biopsy without antibiotic prophylaxis

IF 0.1 Q4 ONCOLOGY Onkourologiya Pub Date : 2021-07-25 DOI:10.17650/17269776-2021-17-2-46-52
D. Chernysheva, S. Popov, I. Orlov, A. V. Tsoy, V. A. Neradovskiy
{"title":"The first experience of transperineal prostate biopsy without antibiotic prophylaxis","authors":"D. Chernysheva, S. Popov, I. Orlov, A. V. Tsoy, V. A. Neradovskiy","doi":"10.17650/17269776-2021-17-2-46-52","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: to study the safety of omitting the antibiotic prophylaxis before transperineal prostate biopsy.Materials and methods. The prospective randomized study included data, obtained during the diagnostical process of 85 patients, who underwent transperineal prostate biopsy in 2020. In the control group (n = 50) patients received 1 g Ceftriaxone IV 1 h before the biopsy. In the study group (n = 35) biopsy was performed without previous antibacterial prophylaxis. Age median was 63.2 (52-75) years.Results. No significant differences in the infection complications rate (UTI, soft tissues infections, prostatitis, fever, sepsis) were obtained between the groups. No patient developed UTI, prostatitis or sepsis, confirmed with urine culture.Conclusion. Performing transperineal prostate biopsy without antibiotic prophylaxis seems to be a safe alternative to common prophylaxis regiments, dedicated to infection complications prevention after prostate biopsy.","PeriodicalId":42924,"journal":{"name":"Onkourologiya","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Onkourologiya","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17650/17269776-2021-17-2-46-52","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Objective: to study the safety of omitting the antibiotic prophylaxis before transperineal prostate biopsy.Materials and methods. The prospective randomized study included data, obtained during the diagnostical process of 85 patients, who underwent transperineal prostate biopsy in 2020. In the control group (n = 50) patients received 1 g Ceftriaxone IV 1 h before the biopsy. In the study group (n = 35) biopsy was performed without previous antibacterial prophylaxis. Age median was 63.2 (52-75) years.Results. No significant differences in the infection complications rate (UTI, soft tissues infections, prostatitis, fever, sepsis) were obtained between the groups. No patient developed UTI, prostatitis or sepsis, confirmed with urine culture.Conclusion. Performing transperineal prostate biopsy without antibiotic prophylaxis seems to be a safe alternative to common prophylaxis regiments, dedicated to infection complications prevention after prostate biopsy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
第一次经会阴前列腺活检没有抗生素预防
目的:探讨经会阴前列腺活检前省略抗生素预防的安全性。材料和方法。这项前瞻性随机研究纳入了85名患者在诊断过程中获得的数据,这些患者于2020年接受了经会阴前列腺活检。在对照组(n = 50)中,患者在活检前1小时接受1 g头孢曲松IV。在研究组(n = 35)中,活检是在没有先前抗菌预防的情况下进行的。年龄中位数为63.2(52-75)岁。两组患者感染并发症(尿路感染、软组织感染、前列腺炎、发热、败血症)发生率差异无统计学意义。尿培养证实无尿路感染、前列腺炎或败血症发生。在没有抗生素预防的情况下进行经会阴前列腺活检似乎是一种安全的替代常规预防方案,致力于预防前列腺活检后的感染并发症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Onkourologiya
Onkourologiya ONCOLOGY-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
59
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: The main objective of the journal "Cancer urology" is publishing up-to-date information about scientific clinical researches, diagnostics, treatment of oncologic urological diseases. The aim of the edition is to inform the experts on oncologic urology about achievements in this area, to build understanding of the necessary integrated interdisciplinary approach in therapy, alongside with urologists, combining efforts of doctors of various specialties (cardiologists, pediatricians, chemotherapeutists et al.), to contribute to raising the effectiveness of oncologic patients’ treatment.
期刊最新文献
Review of the article “Comparison of clips and electrosurgical instruments in sealing of lymphatic vessels during pelvic lymph node dissection at the time of radical cystectomy” Transurethral resection of bladder cancer involving the orifice of the ureter Retrograde endoscopic assisted percutaneous treatment of urinary fistulas after partial nephrectomy Review of the article “Laparoscopic single port radical nephrectomy challenges: a case presentation” Technique and short-term outcomes of surgical treatment in patients with renal cell carcinoma and tumor venous thrombosis: experience of the Urology Clinic, N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1