Waldron y la dignidad: el problema del fundamento de los derechos humanos

IF 0.3 Q3 LAW Derecho PUCP Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI:10.18800/DERECHOPUCP.202002.008
José Carlos Chávez-Fernández Postigo
{"title":"Waldron y la dignidad: el problema del fundamento de los derechos humanos","authors":"José Carlos Chávez-Fernández Postigo","doi":"10.18800/DERECHOPUCP.202002.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since no more than ten years Jeremy Waldron has been working on a legal and philosophical conception of dignity that conceives it mainly as «rank» or «status», and that understands it —not exclusively, but significantly— as the basis of human rights. This approach is proposed as an alternative to the rival conceptions of dignity that are currently found in legal scholarship and in the rulings of high courts, such like the Kantian, the Roman-Catholic and the Dworkinian. This work will try to prove that, despite its great hints, the Waldron’s thesis about dignity has at least three relevant problems which arise from the insufficient clarification of what he calls the «underlying idea» of human dignity, which I will classify as: that of «weakness», that of «harmonization-determination», and that of «secularity». N° 85, 2020 diciembre mayo pp. 247-276","PeriodicalId":41953,"journal":{"name":"Derecho PUCP","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Derecho PUCP","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18800/DERECHOPUCP.202002.008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Since no more than ten years Jeremy Waldron has been working on a legal and philosophical conception of dignity that conceives it mainly as «rank» or «status», and that understands it —not exclusively, but significantly— as the basis of human rights. This approach is proposed as an alternative to the rival conceptions of dignity that are currently found in legal scholarship and in the rulings of high courts, such like the Kantian, the Roman-Catholic and the Dworkinian. This work will try to prove that, despite its great hints, the Waldron’s thesis about dignity has at least three relevant problems which arise from the insufficient clarification of what he calls the «underlying idea» of human dignity, which I will classify as: that of «weakness», that of «harmonization-determination», and that of «secularity». N° 85, 2020 diciembre mayo pp. 247-276
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
沃尔德伦与尊严:人权基础问题
在不到十年的时间里,杰里米·沃尔德伦(Jeremy Waldron)一直致力于研究尊严的法律和哲学概念,该概念主要将其视为“等级”或“地位”,并将其理解为人权的基础-不是唯一的,但意义重大。这种方法被提出作为一种替代目前在法律学术和高等法院裁决中发现的竞争性尊严概念,如康德主义,罗马天主教和德沃宁主义。本文将试图证明,尽管沃尔德伦关于尊严的论点有很多暗示,但它至少有三个相关的问题,这些问题是由于对他所谓的人类尊严的“潜在理念”的澄清不足而产生的,我将其分类为:“弱点”、“和谐决定”和“世俗”。中国生物医学工程学报,2020,pp. 37 - 37
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Las transgresiones respetuosas de la enseñanza del common law y el derecho civil en Quebec: lecciones del método transistémico de educación jurídica Violencia sexual y derecho penal: sobre los problemas contemporáneos en la interpretación del tipo penal de violación sexual en el Código Penal del Perú La formulación de un estándar normativo de imparcialidad que incorpore la imparcialidad objetivo-cognitiva en el ordenamiento jurídico peruano: un estudio sobre la repercusión de la jurisprudencia de los tribunales internacionales de derechos humanos Reflexiones sobre los fundamentos de la responsabilidad médica por wrongful life. ¿La vida como daño? Descripción de los riesgos y desafíos para la integridad académica de aplicaciones generativas de inteligencia artificial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1