Precarity index for psychological studies of the Russian labour market

IF 0.4 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED Organizatsionnaya Psikologiya Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.17323/2312-5942-2022-12-4-103-122
A. Diomin
{"title":"Precarity index for psychological studies of the Russian labour market","authors":"A. Diomin","doi":"10.17323/2312-5942-2022-12-4-103-122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose. The purpose of the article is to substantiate the Precarity Index scale, present its psychometric characteristics, identify psychological and biographical correlates of precarity, and compare different types of employment at the Russian labour market. Method. The sample consistedof 495 people between 30 and 45 years who were included in four types of employment: permanent; fixed-term (one–three years); temporary (less than one year); and casual, short-term employment. Results. The precarious employment attributes have been analyzed both in foreign and domestic approaches. The key attributes are highlighted, and Precarity Index scale is proposed. It includes 13 items to assess current and expected employment characteristics. The hypotheses of construct validity and empirical validity of Precarity Index have been confirmed. Its psychological correlates are experience of job insecurity and forced employment, perception of career development barriers, and deprivation of the psychological benefits which a standard employment relationship includes. Different types of employment have different levels of precarity. Full-time permanent employment hasthe lowest level, casual (short-term) employment has the highest one. The unemployment periods in career and the frequency of job changes during the past three years are the biographical correlates of Precarity Index. Conclusions. The scale has acceptable psychometric properties, construct validity and empirical validity. The Precarity Index can be considered as employment uncertainty for specific individuals and groups, it reflects the history and current quality of their employment. It is proved that the psychological functional structure of precarious work differs from a stable work a lot. There has been made a conclusion that a finer differentiation between casual and temporary (less than one year) employment is needed; the further analysis of informal employment as a component of the Precarity index is needed. Value of results. The Precarity Index is a new instrument to measure a set of behavioural and subjective characteristics of employment. It provides a new perspective to evaluate organizations, social, age, and professional groups in terms of employment quality. The scale has an interdisciplinary potential; it may be useful for sociologists and economists, human resource managers. The emergenceof a compact scale measuring precarity is an important step in the study of human adaptation to different types of employment at the Russian labour market.","PeriodicalId":42215,"journal":{"name":"Organizatsionnaya Psikologiya","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Organizatsionnaya Psikologiya","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17323/2312-5942-2022-12-4-103-122","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose. The purpose of the article is to substantiate the Precarity Index scale, present its psychometric characteristics, identify psychological and biographical correlates of precarity, and compare different types of employment at the Russian labour market. Method. The sample consistedof 495 people between 30 and 45 years who were included in four types of employment: permanent; fixed-term (one–three years); temporary (less than one year); and casual, short-term employment. Results. The precarious employment attributes have been analyzed both in foreign and domestic approaches. The key attributes are highlighted, and Precarity Index scale is proposed. It includes 13 items to assess current and expected employment characteristics. The hypotheses of construct validity and empirical validity of Precarity Index have been confirmed. Its psychological correlates are experience of job insecurity and forced employment, perception of career development barriers, and deprivation of the psychological benefits which a standard employment relationship includes. Different types of employment have different levels of precarity. Full-time permanent employment hasthe lowest level, casual (short-term) employment has the highest one. The unemployment periods in career and the frequency of job changes during the past three years are the biographical correlates of Precarity Index. Conclusions. The scale has acceptable psychometric properties, construct validity and empirical validity. The Precarity Index can be considered as employment uncertainty for specific individuals and groups, it reflects the history and current quality of their employment. It is proved that the psychological functional structure of precarious work differs from a stable work a lot. There has been made a conclusion that a finer differentiation between casual and temporary (less than one year) employment is needed; the further analysis of informal employment as a component of the Precarity index is needed. Value of results. The Precarity Index is a new instrument to measure a set of behavioural and subjective characteristics of employment. It provides a new perspective to evaluate organizations, social, age, and professional groups in terms of employment quality. The scale has an interdisciplinary potential; it may be useful for sociologists and economists, human resource managers. The emergenceof a compact scale measuring precarity is an important step in the study of human adaptation to different types of employment at the Russian labour market.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
俄罗斯劳动力市场心理学研究的不稳定性指数
目的。本文的目的是证实不稳定指数量表,呈现其心理特征,确定不稳定的心理和传记相关性,并比较俄罗斯劳动力市场上不同类型的就业。方法。样本包括495名年龄在30至45岁之间的人,他们从事四种类型的工作:永久工作;有期徒刑(一至三年);临时(一年以下);还有临时的、短期的工作。结果。国内外对不稳定就业的属性进行了分析。强调了关键属性,并提出了不稳定指数量表。它包括13个项目来评估当前和预期的就业特征。验证了不稳定性指数的结构效度和经验效度假设。它的心理关联是工作不安全和强迫就业的经历,对职业发展障碍的认识,以及对标准雇佣关系所包括的心理利益的剥夺。不同类型的就业有不同程度的不稳定性。全职长期就业水平最低,临时(短期)就业水平最高。职业生涯的失业期和近三年内工作变动的频率是不稳定指数的传记性相关。结论。该量表具有良好的心理测量特性、结构效度和经验效度。不稳定性指数可以被认为是特定个人和群体的就业不确定性,它反映了他们的就业历史和当前的质量。研究表明,不稳定工作的心理功能结构与稳定工作有很大的不同。有一个结论是,需要对临时就业和临时就业(少于一年)进行更严格的区分;需要进一步分析非正规就业作为不稳定指数的一个组成部分。结果的价值。不稳定指数是衡量就业的一系列行为和主观特征的新工具。它为评估组织、社会、年龄和专业群体的就业质量提供了一个新的视角。该量表具有跨学科的潜力;它可能对社会学家、经济学家、人力资源经理有用。衡量不稳定性的紧凑尺度的出现是研究人类对俄罗斯劳动力市场不同类型就业的适应的重要一步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Organizatsionnaya Psikologiya
Organizatsionnaya Psikologiya PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
50.00%
发文量
23
期刊最新文献
Роль количества неформальных подгрупп в эффективности производственной малой группы Проблема профессионального выгорания специалистов в сфере информационных технологий: теоретический обзор The role of responsible leadership in relationship between Machiavellianism and Organizational broken windows Взаимосвязь выгорания и удовлетворённости браком у сотрудников российских организаций When employees’ become change agents: Unfolding theme chanism promoting the change supportive behavior
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1