The role of responsible leadership in relationship between Machiavellianism and Organizational broken windows

IF 0.4 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED Organizatsionnaya Psikologiya Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.17323/2312-5942-2023-13-1-59-72
Burcu Üzüm, O. Özkan
{"title":"The role of responsible leadership in relationship between Machiavellianism and Organizational broken windows","authors":"Burcu Üzüm, O. Özkan","doi":"10.17323/2312-5942-2023-13-1-59-72","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Is it possible to see a livable world from a corporate social responsibility perspective? It canbe possible to find the answer for this question through responsible leadership since corporate social responsibility is managed by responsible leaders and the need for responsible leaders is increasing day by day in the 21st century. Purpose. This research aims to determine the effect of responsible leadership on Machiavellianism and organizational broken windows, and to examine the moderating role of responsible leadership in the relationship between Machiavellian behaviors of employees and organizational broken windows, based on theories of corporate social responsibility and self-regulation. Methodology. Therefore, a quantitative method was preferred in the research and a questionnaire form was used as a data collection tool. Participants are employees who are not in a managerial position at a manufacturing enterprise in Istanbul. Voluntarily, 218 participants gave support to the research with the simple random sampling method. Data were analyzed by using SPSS Statistics 25.0 and SmartPLS 3.3.7 software. The relationship between the variables in the research were measured by “Structural equation modeling based on the partial least squares method”. The scale used in the research were subjected to reliability and validity tests at the measurement model stage. In the structural model analysis, the research model and hypotheses were tested to reveal the direction of relations of the latent variables. Findings. In the consequence of the analysis, Machiavellianism has positive effect on organizational broken windows while responsible leadership has negative impact on Machiavellianism and organizational broken windows. Whereas, it was detected that responsible leadership has a regulatory role in the relation between Machiavellianism and organizational broken windows.","PeriodicalId":42215,"journal":{"name":"Organizatsionnaya Psikologiya","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Organizatsionnaya Psikologiya","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17323/2312-5942-2023-13-1-59-72","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Is it possible to see a livable world from a corporate social responsibility perspective? It canbe possible to find the answer for this question through responsible leadership since corporate social responsibility is managed by responsible leaders and the need for responsible leaders is increasing day by day in the 21st century. Purpose. This research aims to determine the effect of responsible leadership on Machiavellianism and organizational broken windows, and to examine the moderating role of responsible leadership in the relationship between Machiavellian behaviors of employees and organizational broken windows, based on theories of corporate social responsibility and self-regulation. Methodology. Therefore, a quantitative method was preferred in the research and a questionnaire form was used as a data collection tool. Participants are employees who are not in a managerial position at a manufacturing enterprise in Istanbul. Voluntarily, 218 participants gave support to the research with the simple random sampling method. Data were analyzed by using SPSS Statistics 25.0 and SmartPLS 3.3.7 software. The relationship between the variables in the research were measured by “Structural equation modeling based on the partial least squares method”. The scale used in the research were subjected to reliability and validity tests at the measurement model stage. In the structural model analysis, the research model and hypotheses were tested to reveal the direction of relations of the latent variables. Findings. In the consequence of the analysis, Machiavellianism has positive effect on organizational broken windows while responsible leadership has negative impact on Machiavellianism and organizational broken windows. Whereas, it was detected that responsible leadership has a regulatory role in the relation between Machiavellianism and organizational broken windows.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
马基雅维利主义与组织破窗关系中负责任领导的作用
是否有可能从企业社会责任的角度来看待一个宜居的世界?因为企业社会责任是由负责任的领导者来管理的,而在21世纪,对负责任的领导者的需求日益增加,所以通过负责任的领导可以找到这个问题的答案。目的。本研究旨在基于企业社会责任和自我调节理论,确定负责任领导对马基雅维利主义和组织破窗的影响,并检验负责任领导在员工马基雅维利行为和组织破窗之间的调节作用。方法。因此,本研究倾向于采用定量方法,并以问卷形式作为数据收集工具。参与者是伊斯坦布尔一家制造企业的非管理职位的员工。218名参与者自愿以简单的随机抽样方式支持了这项研究。采用SPSS Statistics 25.0和SmartPLS 3.3.7软件对数据进行分析。采用“基于偏最小二乘法的结构方程模型”对研究中各变量之间的关系进行测度。本研究使用的量表在测量模型阶段进行了信度和效度检验。在结构模型分析中,对研究模型和假设进行检验,揭示潜在变量关系的方向。发现。分析结果表明,马基雅维利主义对组织破窗有正向影响,而负责任领导对马基雅维利主义和组织破窗有负向影响。研究发现,负责任领导在马基雅维利主义与组织破窗的关系中具有调节作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Organizatsionnaya Psikologiya
Organizatsionnaya Psikologiya PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
50.00%
发文量
23
期刊最新文献
Роль количества неформальных подгрупп в эффективности производственной малой группы Проблема профессионального выгорания специалистов в сфере информационных технологий: теоретический обзор The role of responsible leadership in relationship between Machiavellianism and Organizational broken windows Взаимосвязь выгорания и удовлетворённости браком у сотрудников российских организаций When employees’ become change agents: Unfolding theme chanism promoting the change supportive behavior
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1