Trait emotional intelligence among hierarchical levels of leadership

IF 0.4 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED Organizatsionnaya Psikologiya Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.17323/2312-5942-2022-12-4-69-85
Christina Morfaki
{"title":"Trait emotional intelligence among hierarchical levels of leadership","authors":"Christina Morfaki","doi":"10.17323/2312-5942-2022-12-4-69-85","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"urpose. This study examined whether trait emotional intelligence (or emotional self-efficacy) can differentiate across leadership levels in a sample of senior, middle, and junior leaders, employed by a bank organization in Greece (N = 157). Method. For the objectives of this study, the Trait Emotional Intelligence Questionnaire (TEIQue) short form (Petrides, 2009) was sufficient. It includes 30 items from the full form (two items for each of the 15 facets) and can be used to measure the four components generated from the full form: emotionality, self-control, sociability, and well-being, as well as the global trait emotional intelligence. Age, gender, tenure, and education level were used as control variables. Traitemotional intelligence, age and education were significant predictors in a multinomial regression model. Findings. Regarding senior leaders, the odds were significantly higher for each unit increase in trait EI(5.58) than for middle leaders (1.92), with junior leaders as the reference category. Further, leadersscored significantly higher on trait emotional intelligence compared to the standardization sample of the TEIQue. Τhe difference is due to senior and middle leaders, though the effect size for the former was considerably larger than for the latter, whereas junior leaders did not show statistically significant differences. Trait emotional intelligence and four factors’ impacts (self-control, well-being, emotionality, and sociability) were investigated among the three hierarchical leadership levels. Value of results. The results support the notion that leadership positions require high trait emotional intelligence and that leadership needs are dependent on the leader’s level within the organization.","PeriodicalId":42215,"journal":{"name":"Organizatsionnaya Psikologiya","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Organizatsionnaya Psikologiya","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17323/2312-5942-2022-12-4-69-85","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

urpose. This study examined whether trait emotional intelligence (or emotional self-efficacy) can differentiate across leadership levels in a sample of senior, middle, and junior leaders, employed by a bank organization in Greece (N = 157). Method. For the objectives of this study, the Trait Emotional Intelligence Questionnaire (TEIQue) short form (Petrides, 2009) was sufficient. It includes 30 items from the full form (two items for each of the 15 facets) and can be used to measure the four components generated from the full form: emotionality, self-control, sociability, and well-being, as well as the global trait emotional intelligence. Age, gender, tenure, and education level were used as control variables. Traitemotional intelligence, age and education were significant predictors in a multinomial regression model. Findings. Regarding senior leaders, the odds were significantly higher for each unit increase in trait EI(5.58) than for middle leaders (1.92), with junior leaders as the reference category. Further, leadersscored significantly higher on trait emotional intelligence compared to the standardization sample of the TEIQue. Τhe difference is due to senior and middle leaders, though the effect size for the former was considerably larger than for the latter, whereas junior leaders did not show statistically significant differences. Trait emotional intelligence and four factors’ impacts (self-control, well-being, emotionality, and sociability) were investigated among the three hierarchical leadership levels. Value of results. The results support the notion that leadership positions require high trait emotional intelligence and that leadership needs are dependent on the leader’s level within the organization.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阶层领导的特质情商
urpose。本研究以希腊一家银行机构(N = 157)的高级、中级和初级领导为样本,考察了情商(或情绪自我效能感)特征是否可以区分不同的领导水平。方法。本研究的目的,特质情绪智力问卷(TEIQue)简短形式(Petrides, 2009)是足够的。它包括完整形式的30个项目(15个方面各两个项目),可用于测量完整形式产生的四个组成部分:情绪,自我控制,社交能力和幸福感,以及整体特征情商。年龄、性别、任期和教育水平作为控制变量。在多项回归模型中,特质情商、年龄和受教育程度是显著的预测因子。发现。以初级领导为参考类别,高层领导特质EI每单位增加的几率(5.58)显著高于中层领导(1.92)。此外,与TEIQue的标准化样本相比,领导者在特质情商上的得分明显更高。Τhe的差异是由于高层和中层领导,虽然前者的效应量明显大于后者,而初级领导没有统计学上的显著差异。研究了三种层级领导的特质情商及其对自我控制、幸福感、情绪性和社交能力的影响。结果的价值。研究结果支持了领导职位需要高特质情商的观点,并且领导需求依赖于领导者在组织中的水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Organizatsionnaya Psikologiya
Organizatsionnaya Psikologiya PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
50.00%
发文量
23
期刊最新文献
Роль количества неформальных подгрупп в эффективности производственной малой группы Проблема профессионального выгорания специалистов в сфере информационных технологий: теоретический обзор The role of responsible leadership in relationship between Machiavellianism and Organizational broken windows Взаимосвязь выгорания и удовлетворённости браком у сотрудников российских организаций When employees’ become change agents: Unfolding theme chanism promoting the change supportive behavior
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1