Developing A Theologically Self-Reflexive Critique With Comparative Theologians And The Sociological Analysis Of Pierre Bourdieu

IF 0.1 0 RELIGION Louvain Studies Pub Date : 2018-01-01 DOI:10.2143/LS.41.2.3284883
Colby Dickinson
{"title":"Developing A Theologically Self-Reflexive Critique With Comparative Theologians And The Sociological Analysis Of Pierre Bourdieu","authors":"Colby Dickinson","doi":"10.2143/LS.41.2.3284883","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"— In this article I attempt to locate productive foundations for a critical theological methodology through engaging with both the inherently critical nature of comparative theology alongside the sociological, self reflexive analysis of Pierre Bourdieu. I turn, first, to comparative theology because it is a field with a heightened sensibility for how self-reflexive critique fiinctions within a theological context, as it assumes that both sides in any conversation maintain the possibility of re-examining their own premises and foundations. I turn, second, to the work of the sociologist Pierre Bourdieu because it is his analysis of symbolic poiver that provides an examination of self reflexive structures of understanding that might further assist theologians, comparative or not, to take up a critical theology from within the established traditions that constitute the field of theology proper. My argument is that theology has been beholden for far too long, centuries in fact, to non self reflexive structures of inquiiy. From our current vantage point, only a selfreflexive, critical theology can properly endeavor to be a theological investigation, as this is the only way to understand the outplaying of the confessional content of the theological tradition.","PeriodicalId":41540,"journal":{"name":"Louvain Studies","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Louvain Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2143/LS.41.2.3284883","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

— In this article I attempt to locate productive foundations for a critical theological methodology through engaging with both the inherently critical nature of comparative theology alongside the sociological, self reflexive analysis of Pierre Bourdieu. I turn, first, to comparative theology because it is a field with a heightened sensibility for how self-reflexive critique fiinctions within a theological context, as it assumes that both sides in any conversation maintain the possibility of re-examining their own premises and foundations. I turn, second, to the work of the sociologist Pierre Bourdieu because it is his analysis of symbolic poiver that provides an examination of self reflexive structures of understanding that might further assist theologians, comparative or not, to take up a critical theology from within the established traditions that constitute the field of theology proper. My argument is that theology has been beholden for far too long, centuries in fact, to non self reflexive structures of inquiiy. From our current vantage point, only a selfreflexive, critical theology can properly endeavor to be a theological investigation, as this is the only way to understand the outplaying of the confessional content of the theological tradition.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比较神学家的神学自我反思批判与布迪厄的社会学分析
在这篇文章中,我试图通过与比较神学固有的批判性质以及皮埃尔·布迪厄的社会学、自我反思分析相结合,为批判神学方法论找到富有成效的基础。首先,我转向比较神学,因为它是一个对如何在神学背景下自我反思批判小说具有高度敏感性的领域,因为它假设任何对话中的双方都保持重新检查自己的前提和基础的可能性。其次,我转向社会学家皮埃尔·布迪厄的作品,因为正是他对象征力量的分析,提供了对自我反思的理解结构的考察,这可能进一步帮助神学家,无论是否比较,从构成神学领域的既定传统中,接受一种批判神学。我的观点是,神学长久以来,实际上是几个世纪以来,一直依赖于非自我反思的探究结构。从我们目前的有利位置来看,只有自我反思的、批判的神学才能适当地努力成为一种神学研究,因为这是理解神学传统的忏悔内容被超越的唯一途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Louvain Studies
Louvain Studies RELIGION-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Review of the book Soul Friendship: A Practical Theology of Spiritual Direction, Adrian Charfield and Nigel Rooms, 2019] [Review of the book Context and Text: A Method for Liturgical Theology, K. W. Irwin, 2018] “I Exist in Believing”: Anthropology as a Theological and Emancipative Pursuit. A Response to Michael Banner The difficult but possible path towards forgiveness and reconciliation Developing A Theologically Self-Reflexive Critique With Comparative Theologians And The Sociological Analysis Of Pierre Bourdieu
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1