Assessment of excavation intersections’ stability in jointed rock masses using the discontinuum approach

IF 1.2 Q3 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Rudarsko-Geolosko-Naftni Zbornik Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.17794/rgn.2022.2.12
Anatolii Protosenya, M. Vilner
{"title":"Assessment of excavation intersections’ stability in jointed rock masses using the discontinuum approach","authors":"Anatolii Protosenya, M. Vilner","doi":"10.17794/rgn.2022.2.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"During ore deposit development, vast networks of excavations are designed, and the volume of their intersections reaches 10%. At excavation intersections, the prediction of stress-strain state changes is complicated due to spatial geometry, the cross-coupling effect, construction sequence, etc. Mechanical properties of rocks, joint set parameters and the initial stress field also have a significant impact on stress redistribution. According to studies, up to 40% of the total number of failures in excavations occur during their intersections’ construction or reinforcing. Loads on the intersection support in accordance with existing methods are determined as for single excavations with an equivalent span and defined as the width of the larger excavation. The trend towards the intensification of mining, an increase in depth and the complexity of mining and geological conditions also complicate stress state assessment. Existing approaches need to be revised and updated for a more accurate prediction of the stress-strain state at intersections, and should consider spatial geometry, joint sets and initial stress field parameters. In this research, discrete element numerical modelling in 3DEC is done and the results are compared with existing empirical methods. Numerical models are created in a spatial setting and contain explicit representations of joints in the rock mass. Models are verified based on in-situ data, and the obtained results show a difference of up to 2 times in comparison with empirical results. This indicates that the reliability of the existing empirical methods is low, which may lead to stability loss on an intersection. Therefore, empirical methods should be updated. This can be done on the basis of numerical modelling, which shows sufficient convergence with in-situ data.","PeriodicalId":44536,"journal":{"name":"Rudarsko-Geolosko-Naftni Zbornik","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rudarsko-Geolosko-Naftni Zbornik","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17794/rgn.2022.2.12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

During ore deposit development, vast networks of excavations are designed, and the volume of their intersections reaches 10%. At excavation intersections, the prediction of stress-strain state changes is complicated due to spatial geometry, the cross-coupling effect, construction sequence, etc. Mechanical properties of rocks, joint set parameters and the initial stress field also have a significant impact on stress redistribution. According to studies, up to 40% of the total number of failures in excavations occur during their intersections’ construction or reinforcing. Loads on the intersection support in accordance with existing methods are determined as for single excavations with an equivalent span and defined as the width of the larger excavation. The trend towards the intensification of mining, an increase in depth and the complexity of mining and geological conditions also complicate stress state assessment. Existing approaches need to be revised and updated for a more accurate prediction of the stress-strain state at intersections, and should consider spatial geometry, joint sets and initial stress field parameters. In this research, discrete element numerical modelling in 3DEC is done and the results are compared with existing empirical methods. Numerical models are created in a spatial setting and contain explicit representations of joints in the rock mass. Models are verified based on in-situ data, and the obtained results show a difference of up to 2 times in comparison with empirical results. This indicates that the reliability of the existing empirical methods is low, which may lead to stability loss on an intersection. Therefore, empirical methods should be updated. This can be done on the basis of numerical modelling, which shows sufficient convergence with in-situ data.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
节理岩体开挖交叉口稳定性的非连续介质评价
在矿床开发过程中,设计了庞大的挖掘网络,其交叉点的体积达到10%。在开挖交叉路口,由于空间几何、交叉耦合效应、施工顺序等因素的影响,应力-应变状态变化预测较为复杂。岩石力学性质、节理设置参数和初始应力场对应力重分布也有显著影响。根据研究,高达40%的挖掘破坏发生在其相交的施工或加固过程中。根据现有的方法,交叉支护荷载被确定为具有等效跨度的单个开挖,并定义为较大开挖的宽度。采矿强度的增加、开采深度的增加以及采矿和地质条件的复杂性也使应力状态评价复杂化。现有的方法需要修正和更新,以更准确地预测交叉点的应力-应变状态,并应考虑空间几何形状、节理集和初始应力场参数。在本研究中,对3DEC进行离散元数值模拟,并与已有的经验方法进行了比较。数值模型是在空间环境中创建的,包含岩体中节理的明确表示。基于现场数据对模型进行了验证,所得结果与经验结果相差达2倍。这表明现有经验方法的可靠性较低,可能导致交叉口的稳定性损失。因此,经验方法需要更新。这可以在数值模拟的基础上进行,与现场数据有足够的收敛性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
15.40%
发文量
50
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
A NEW TECHNIQUE BASED ON ANT COLONY OPTIMIZATION FOR DESIGNING MINING PUSHBACKS IN THE PRESENCE OF GEOLOGICAL UNCERTAINTY IMPROVED CONCEPTUAL DESIGN OF LILW REPOSITORY ONE-STEP ELECTROCHEMICAL SYNTHESIS OF PEDOT BASED COMPOSITES FOR SUPERCAPACITOR APPLICATIONS A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE BIVARIATE STATISTICAL METHODS AND THE ANALYTICAL HIERARCHICAL PROCESS FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF MASS MOVEMENT SUSCEPTIBILITY. A CASE STUDY: THE LM-116 ROAD – PERU THE INTERACTION AND SYNERGIC EFFECT OF PARTICLE SIZE ON FLOTATION EFFICIENCY: A COMPARISON STUDY OF RECOVERY BY SIZE, AND BY LIBERATION BETWEEN LAB AND INDUSTRIAL SCALE DATA
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1