QUANTITATIVE RISK ASSESSMENT OF THE EFFECT OF SAND ON MULTIPHASE FLOW IN PIPELINE

IF 1.2 Q3 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Rudarsko-Geolosko-Naftni Zbornik Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.17794/rgn.2022.4.4
U. Duru, P. Ikpeka, Chiziterem Ndukwe-Nwoke, A. Arinkoola, S. Onwukwe
{"title":"QUANTITATIVE RISK ASSESSMENT OF THE EFFECT OF SAND ON MULTIPHASE FLOW IN PIPELINE","authors":"U. Duru, P. Ikpeka, Chiziterem Ndukwe-Nwoke, A. Arinkoola, S. Onwukwe","doi":"10.17794/rgn.2022.4.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The presence of sand particles flowing along with reservoir fluids in a pipeline increases the probability of pipeline failure. The risk of pipeline failure is either accentuated or abated by the flow conditions of the fluids in the pipeline. In this study, a quantitative risk analysis of the effect of sand on pipelines during multiphase flow, under the pipeline failure modes; sanding up, erosion, and encountering abnormal pressure gradient was conducted. Three piping components were considered: line pipe (nominal size 1.5 in [3.8 cm]), swing check valve (nominal size 12.007 in [30.5cm]) and 90 deg LR Elbow (nominal size 2.25 in [5.7cm]). Correlations that indicate the critical velocities and the critical sand concentrations above/below which these failures occur were employed and implemented in a Visual Basic program. The analysis was conducted at a temperature of 204 °C and pressure of 604 psi [4.2×106 Pa]. A probability distribution, simulating real-life scenario was developed using Monte Carlo simulation. This determines the probability of deriving critical sand concentration values that fall beyond the set statistical limits which indicates the probability of occurrence of the failure being investigated. For all three failures, the severity of occurrence (represented by CAPEX incurred in solving the failures) was multiplied with the probability of failure which gave rise to the risk indexes. Based on the histogram plot of average risk index and analysis, the study reveals that larger diameter components are prone to turbulence which lead to greater risk of erosion. The risk of abnormal pressure drop and sanding up were considerably lower than that for erosion (abrasion).","PeriodicalId":44536,"journal":{"name":"Rudarsko-Geolosko-Naftni Zbornik","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rudarsko-Geolosko-Naftni Zbornik","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17794/rgn.2022.4.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The presence of sand particles flowing along with reservoir fluids in a pipeline increases the probability of pipeline failure. The risk of pipeline failure is either accentuated or abated by the flow conditions of the fluids in the pipeline. In this study, a quantitative risk analysis of the effect of sand on pipelines during multiphase flow, under the pipeline failure modes; sanding up, erosion, and encountering abnormal pressure gradient was conducted. Three piping components were considered: line pipe (nominal size 1.5 in [3.8 cm]), swing check valve (nominal size 12.007 in [30.5cm]) and 90 deg LR Elbow (nominal size 2.25 in [5.7cm]). Correlations that indicate the critical velocities and the critical sand concentrations above/below which these failures occur were employed and implemented in a Visual Basic program. The analysis was conducted at a temperature of 204 °C and pressure of 604 psi [4.2×106 Pa]. A probability distribution, simulating real-life scenario was developed using Monte Carlo simulation. This determines the probability of deriving critical sand concentration values that fall beyond the set statistical limits which indicates the probability of occurrence of the failure being investigated. For all three failures, the severity of occurrence (represented by CAPEX incurred in solving the failures) was multiplied with the probability of failure which gave rise to the risk indexes. Based on the histogram plot of average risk index and analysis, the study reveals that larger diameter components are prone to turbulence which lead to greater risk of erosion. The risk of abnormal pressure drop and sanding up were considerably lower than that for erosion (abrasion).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
砂对管道多相流影响的定量风险评估
随着储层流体在管道中流动的砂粒增加了管道失效的可能性。管道中流体的流动状况会加重或减轻管道失效的风险。本文对管道在多相流过程中,在不同的失效模式下,砂体对管道的影响进行了定量风险分析;进行了出砂、冲蚀和遇到异常压力梯度的试验。考虑了三种管道组件:管道(公称尺寸1.5英寸[3.8厘米]),旋启式止回阀(公称尺寸12.007英寸[30.5厘米])和90度LR弯头(公称尺寸2.25英寸[5.7厘米])。在Visual Basic程序中使用并实现了表明临界速度和临界砂浓度高于/低于这些故障发生的相关性。分析在温度为204℃,压力为604 psi [4.2×106 Pa]下进行。利用蒙特卡罗模拟技术,开发了一个模拟现实生活场景的概率分布。这决定了得出临界砂浓度值超出设定的统计限制的概率,这表明正在研究的故障发生的概率。对于这三种故障,将发生的严重程度(用解决故障所产生的资本支出表示)乘以故障概率,得到风险指数。基于平均风险指数直方图和分析,研究发现直径越大的构件容易发生湍流,导致侵蚀风险越大。异常压降和出砂的风险大大低于侵蚀(磨损)的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
15.40%
发文量
50
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
A NEW TECHNIQUE BASED ON ANT COLONY OPTIMIZATION FOR DESIGNING MINING PUSHBACKS IN THE PRESENCE OF GEOLOGICAL UNCERTAINTY IMPROVED CONCEPTUAL DESIGN OF LILW REPOSITORY ONE-STEP ELECTROCHEMICAL SYNTHESIS OF PEDOT BASED COMPOSITES FOR SUPERCAPACITOR APPLICATIONS A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE BIVARIATE STATISTICAL METHODS AND THE ANALYTICAL HIERARCHICAL PROCESS FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF MASS MOVEMENT SUSCEPTIBILITY. A CASE STUDY: THE LM-116 ROAD – PERU THE INTERACTION AND SYNERGIC EFFECT OF PARTICLE SIZE ON FLOTATION EFFICIENCY: A COMPARISON STUDY OF RECOVERY BY SIZE, AND BY LIBERATION BETWEEN LAB AND INDUSTRIAL SCALE DATA
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1