IMPACT OF DRILLING ANGLE ON BLASTING COSTS IN SURFACE WORKS

IF 1.2 Q3 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Rudarsko-Geolosko-Naftni Zbornik Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.17794/rgn.2022.4.6
Frasher Brahimaj, I. Zeqiri, Risto Dambov, Shkurte Brahimaj
{"title":"IMPACT OF DRILLING ANGLE ON BLASTING COSTS IN SURFACE WORKS","authors":"Frasher Brahimaj, I. Zeqiri, Risto Dambov, Shkurte Brahimaj","doi":"10.17794/rgn.2022.4.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The removal of rock masses or their use with surface exploitation requires that this work be done at the lowest possible cost. The reduction of operating costs is done by analyzing each work action, working method, and the possibility of changing them, to have an impact on reducing costs. The drilling angle is one of the most important factors during surface exploitation by blasting. By changing the drilling angle, we achieve a reduction of the total drilling length, to have a reduction of the amount of explosives and other changes during the blasting process which do not greatly affect the cost of blasting. Determining the impact of drilling angle on the cost of blasting is determined by analytical methods and by comparing the results of applied drilling angle methods. During the analytical analysis of the blasting data and the comparison of their results, which was performed to determine the change in the cost of blasting depending on the drilling angle, and it concluded that for the removal of 200000 (m3) rock material, 356167.98 (€) can be saved, by applying the 90° angle drilling method. This change of drilling angle from the projected angle of 63° to the angle of drilling 90°, reduces the total cost of blastings by about 10.69 (%).","PeriodicalId":44536,"journal":{"name":"Rudarsko-Geolosko-Naftni Zbornik","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rudarsko-Geolosko-Naftni Zbornik","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17794/rgn.2022.4.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The removal of rock masses or their use with surface exploitation requires that this work be done at the lowest possible cost. The reduction of operating costs is done by analyzing each work action, working method, and the possibility of changing them, to have an impact on reducing costs. The drilling angle is one of the most important factors during surface exploitation by blasting. By changing the drilling angle, we achieve a reduction of the total drilling length, to have a reduction of the amount of explosives and other changes during the blasting process which do not greatly affect the cost of blasting. Determining the impact of drilling angle on the cost of blasting is determined by analytical methods and by comparing the results of applied drilling angle methods. During the analytical analysis of the blasting data and the comparison of their results, which was performed to determine the change in the cost of blasting depending on the drilling angle, and it concluded that for the removal of 200000 (m3) rock material, 356167.98 (€) can be saved, by applying the 90° angle drilling method. This change of drilling angle from the projected angle of 63° to the angle of drilling 90°, reduces the total cost of blastings by about 10.69 (%).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
钻孔角度对地面工程爆破费用的影响
岩体的移除或地表开采要求以尽可能低的成本完成这项工作。降低作业成本是通过分析每个作业动作、作业方法以及改变它们的可能性来实现的,从而对降低成本产生影响。钻孔角度是露天爆破开采中最重要的因素之一。通过改变钻孔角度,我们实现了总钻孔长度的减少,炸药量的减少以及爆破过程中的其他变化,而这些变化对爆破成本的影响并不大。确定钻孔角度对爆破成本的影响是通过分析方法和比较常用的钻孔角度方法的结果来确定的。通过对爆破数据的分析分析和结果的比较,确定了爆破成本随钻孔角度的变化,得出采用90°角钻孔法,每清除20万m3的岩石材料,可节省356167.98欧元。将钻孔角度从63°的投影角度改变为90°的钻孔角度,可使爆破总成本降低约10.69%(%)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
15.40%
发文量
50
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
A NEW TECHNIQUE BASED ON ANT COLONY OPTIMIZATION FOR DESIGNING MINING PUSHBACKS IN THE PRESENCE OF GEOLOGICAL UNCERTAINTY IMPROVED CONCEPTUAL DESIGN OF LILW REPOSITORY ONE-STEP ELECTROCHEMICAL SYNTHESIS OF PEDOT BASED COMPOSITES FOR SUPERCAPACITOR APPLICATIONS A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE BIVARIATE STATISTICAL METHODS AND THE ANALYTICAL HIERARCHICAL PROCESS FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF MASS MOVEMENT SUSCEPTIBILITY. A CASE STUDY: THE LM-116 ROAD – PERU THE INTERACTION AND SYNERGIC EFFECT OF PARTICLE SIZE ON FLOTATION EFFICIENCY: A COMPARISON STUDY OF RECOVERY BY SIZE, AND BY LIBERATION BETWEEN LAB AND INDUSTRIAL SCALE DATA
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1