Replacing the Estate Tax with a Re-Imagined Accessions Tax

IF 0.7 4区 社会学 Q2 LAW Hastings Law Journal Pub Date : 2008-10-16 DOI:10.2139/SSRN.1285515
Joseph M. Dodge
{"title":"Replacing the Estate Tax with a Re-Imagined Accessions Tax","authors":"Joseph M. Dodge","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.1285515","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article proposes replacing the federal estate and gift tax system with an accessions tax. An accessions tax is a tax, at progressive rates, on the aggregate lifetime gratuitous receipts of an individual in excess of a specified exemption. The main thesis of this article is that an accessions tax is not simply a reverse image of the current estate tax system, but is significantly different both in purpose and effect. An accessions tax should be an easier pill to swallow than the estate tax, because it is a tax on the unearned income (accessions to wealth) of individuals. In operation, the accessions tax can avoid many of the loopholes in the estate tax, because the accession can occur after the transferor's death. Accessions would be taxed only when realized in cash or assets that are not hard to value. Thus, only trust distributions (as opposed to the acquisition of trust interests) would be taxed. Accordingly, actuarial tables would be irrelevant, and general powers of appointment would be ignored. Taxation of qualified hard-to-value property (such as interests in a closely-held business) would be deferred to conversion to cash (or other event whereby qualification lapses). Accessions by charities and by the spouse of the transferor would be excluded, as would transactions (such as one person purchasing the consumption of another) that do not involve true wealth transfers. Elaborate qualification rules for the spousal and charitable exclusions would not be necessary.","PeriodicalId":46736,"journal":{"name":"Hastings Law Journal","volume":"60 1","pages":"997"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2008-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hastings Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1285515","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This article proposes replacing the federal estate and gift tax system with an accessions tax. An accessions tax is a tax, at progressive rates, on the aggregate lifetime gratuitous receipts of an individual in excess of a specified exemption. The main thesis of this article is that an accessions tax is not simply a reverse image of the current estate tax system, but is significantly different both in purpose and effect. An accessions tax should be an easier pill to swallow than the estate tax, because it is a tax on the unearned income (accessions to wealth) of individuals. In operation, the accessions tax can avoid many of the loopholes in the estate tax, because the accession can occur after the transferor's death. Accessions would be taxed only when realized in cash or assets that are not hard to value. Thus, only trust distributions (as opposed to the acquisition of trust interests) would be taxed. Accordingly, actuarial tables would be irrelevant, and general powers of appointment would be ignored. Taxation of qualified hard-to-value property (such as interests in a closely-held business) would be deferred to conversion to cash (or other event whereby qualification lapses). Accessions by charities and by the spouse of the transferor would be excluded, as would transactions (such as one person purchasing the consumption of another) that do not involve true wealth transfers. Elaborate qualification rules for the spousal and charitable exclusions would not be necessary.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
以重新构想的继承税取代遗产税
这篇文章建议用附加税取代联邦遗产税和赠与税制度。附加税是以累进税率征收的税,征收对象是个人终身所得的总收入,超过指定的豁免额。本文的主要论点是,征收遗产税并不是现行遗产税制度的简单翻版,而是在目的和效果上都有显著的不同。赠与税应该比遗产税更容易下咽,因为它是对个人的非劳动所得(财富的增加)征税。在操作上,继承税可以避免遗产税的许多漏洞,因为继承可以发生在转让人死后。只有以现金或不难估值的资产变现时才会征税。因此,只有信托分配(而不是信托权益的获得)才会被征税。因此,精算表将是无关紧要的,一般的任命权力将被忽略。对符合条件的难以估价的财产(如少数人持有的企业的权益)的征税将推迟到转换为现金(或其他导致资格失效的事件)。慈善机构和转让人配偶的加入将被排除在外,不涉及真正财富转移的交易(例如一人购买另一人的消费)也将被排除在外。没有必要为配偶和慈善事业的排除制定详细的资格规则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Hastings College of the Law was founded in 1878 as the first law department of the University of California, and today is one of the top-rated law schools in the United States. Its alumni span the globe and are among the most respected lawyers, judges and business leaders today. Hastings was founded in 1878 as the first law department of the University of California and is one of the most exciting and vibrant legal education centers in the nation. Our faculty are nationally renowned as both teachers and scholars.
期刊最新文献
Corporations and the Original Meaning of 'Citizens' in Article III Law of the State and Politics Beyond the Double Veto: Housing Plans as Preemptive Intergovernmental Compacts Unmasking the Right of Publicity History, Tradition, the Supreme Court, and the First Amendment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1