求助PDF
{"title":"Het Sint-Agnesklooster en de Moderne Devotie","authors":"K. Goudriaan","doi":"10.2143/OGE.81.1.2049255","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The monastery of Saint Agnes at Arnhem rooted in the fifteenth-century reform movement of the Devotio Moderna. The central question of this contribution concerns the extent to which the spiritual renewal occurring in this monastery in the middle of the sixteenth century may be accounted for by impulses from within the Devotio Moderna. In the first part, the institutional and personal ties with the Modern Devotion are investigated. From approximately 1459 onwards, the inhabitants lived as regular canon-esses according to the rule of Saint Augustine. They are called moniales (nuns), which makes it likely that at least part of them used to sing the Latin office. The monastery was not incorporated in the Chapter of Windesheim as a full member, which did not prevent it from receiving pastoral care by regular canons belonging to the Chapter. In the beginning of the sixteenth century confessors used to come from Albergen (Twente), and from the last decads of this century onwards from Gaesdonck (Lower Rhine region): so much was known already. It now appears that in the years around 1560 a significant role has been played by Nicolaas van Diepenbroick, a confessor originating from the monastery of Bethlehem in the city of Zwolle. Bethlehem was one of the members of the Chapter of Windesheim that maintained strict regular observance right through the sixteenth century. Moreover, it possessed an important library, nothing of which is left now, unfortunately. Diepenbroick succeeded in ending a crisis that had put community life in the monastery of Saint Agnes in jeopardy. The second part of this article focuses on texts produced by authors from within the Devotio Moderna and circulating in the monastery. The number of such texts is rather modest, but the contexts in which they have been handed down, are interesting. A first group of texts is found in three manuscripts, which, together with a fourth one, were copied in and for the monastery around the year 1470. The general content of these manuscripts focuses on the building up of life in community and on the acquisition of monastic virtues. They belong to the period immediately following the adoption by the sisters of Saint Agnes of the rule of Saint Augustine. The texts originating within the Devotio Moderna and copied in the middle of the sixteenth century are of a definitely more mystical nature. Tentatively, some of the manuscripts containing them may be brought in connection with the restauration period under the guidance of Nicolaas van Diepenbroick. © Ons Geestelijk Erf. All rights reserved.","PeriodicalId":39580,"journal":{"name":"Ons Geestelijk Erf","volume":"81 1","pages":"17-37"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ons Geestelijk Erf","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2143/OGE.81.1.2049255","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
引用
批量引用
圣艾格尼丝修道院与现代奉献
阿纳姆的圣阿格尼斯修道院起源于15世纪的现代宗教改革运动。这一贡献的核心问题是,16世纪中叶发生在这座修道院的精神复兴在多大程度上可能是由“现代奉献”(Devotio Moderna)内部的冲动造成的。在第一部分,制度和个人关系与现代奉献考察。大约从1459年开始,根据圣奥古斯丁的规定,这里的居民以普通修女的身份生活。她们被称为moniales(修女),这使得她们中至少有一部分人可能曾经唱过拉丁语的“办公室”。修道院并没有被纳入Windesheim章节作为一个正式成员,这并不妨碍它从属于该章的正规教规接受教牧关怀。在16世纪初,忏悔者通常来自阿尔伯根(特温特),从本世纪最后几十年开始,来自盖斯顿克(下莱茵河地区):已经知道了这么多。现在看来,在1560年左右,来自兹沃勒市伯利恒修道院的忏悔者尼古拉斯·范·迪彭布罗克(Nicolaas van Diepenbroick)扮演了一个重要的角色。伯利恒是温德斯海姆分会的成员之一,该分会在16世纪一直保持着严格的常规仪式。此外,它拥有一个重要的图书馆,不幸的是,现在已经没有了。迪彭布罗克成功地结束了一场危机,这场危机使圣艾格尼丝修道院的社区生活处于危险之中。本文的第二部分着重于作者在《现代祈祷》内部创作并在修道院流传的文本。这类文本的数量相当有限,但它们流传下来的背景却很有趣。第一组文本是在三份手稿中发现的,这三份手稿和第四份手稿是在1470年左右为修道院抄写的。这些手稿的总体内容集中在社区生活的建立和修道院美德的获得上。他们属于时期后立即采用的规则的圣奥古斯丁的圣阿格尼斯的姐妹。源自《现代祈祷》的文本,在16世纪中期被复制,显然具有更神秘的性质。暂时地,一些包含它们的手稿可能会在尼古拉斯·范·迪彭布罗克的指导下与修复时期联系起来。©Ons Geestelijk Erf。版权所有。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。