A Response to Prof. Shavell’s ‘Should Copyright of Academic Works Be Abolished?’

Hossein Nabilou
{"title":"A Response to Prof. Shavell’s ‘Should Copyright of Academic Works Be Abolished?’","authors":"Hossein Nabilou","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1493466","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Undoubtedly, the idea of strong property rights is the underlying idea of economics and one of the main sources of economic incentive. In his paper, Prof. Shavell (see Shavell, 2009) seems to question and eventually impugn the idea of the economic efficiency of property rights in the market place of ideas in the academic world. In this regard, I will criticize his paper with the economic methods and will explain how Prof. Shavell’s idea of the abolishing copyrights for the academic works might suffer from inconsistencies and also lacks the merits in generating a more economically efficient atmosphere for the academic works.","PeriodicalId":36243,"journal":{"name":"Review of Economic Research on Copyright Issues","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Economic Research on Copyright Issues","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1493466","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Undoubtedly, the idea of strong property rights is the underlying idea of economics and one of the main sources of economic incentive. In his paper, Prof. Shavell (see Shavell, 2009) seems to question and eventually impugn the idea of the economic efficiency of property rights in the market place of ideas in the academic world. In this regard, I will criticize his paper with the economic methods and will explain how Prof. Shavell’s idea of the abolishing copyrights for the academic works might suffer from inconsistencies and also lacks the merits in generating a more economically efficient atmosphere for the academic works.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对Shavell教授“学术作品版权应该废除吗?”的回应”
毫无疑问,强产权思想是经济学的基本思想,是经济激励的主要来源之一。在他的论文中,Shavell教授(见Shavell, 2009)似乎质疑并最终质疑学术界的市场思想中产权的经济效率。在这方面,我将用经济学的方法来批评他的论文,并将解释Shavell教授关于废除学术作品版权的想法如何存在不一致性,并且缺乏为学术作品创造更经济高效的氛围的优点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Pollution Haven and Corruption Paradise Loss Aversion and Gain Appetite in the Small and in the Large Vertical Differentiation and Labour in a General Equilibrium Model Intellectual Property Law Harmonization within and Beyond Europe: Achievements and Future Challenges Language, Copyright and Geographic Segmentation in the EU Digital, Single Market for Music and Film
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1