Hydrodynamical evaluation of microporous covered stent for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: Comparison of flow reduction property with flow diverter stent by using particle imaging velocimetry and in vitro flow simulator

Q4 Engineering Journal of Biorheology Pub Date : 2018-01-01 DOI:10.17106/JBR.32.20
T. Moriwaki, T. Tajikawa, Y. Nakayama
{"title":"Hydrodynamical evaluation of microporous covered stent for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: Comparison of flow reduction property with flow diverter stent by using particle imaging velocimetry and in vitro flow simulator","authors":"T. Moriwaki, T. Tajikawa, Y. Nakayama","doi":"10.17106/JBR.32.20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We have developed a microporous covered stent (MCS) for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms (IAs). MCS promotes intentional thrombosis in the IA by blood stagnation and facilitates IA embolization treatment by clotting of whole blood in the IA. Flow reduction is a key property of such stent-type IA embolization devices. In this study, we evaluated the flow reduction property of MCS, and compered that of a general balloon expandable stent (bare stent, BS) for supporting a stenotic vessel and a typical flow diverter stent (FD) for IA treatment. This was carried out using particle imaging velocimetry (PIV) and an in vitro flow simulator with a saccular IA and straight parent vessel model. The PIV results show that the area mean shear rates in the IA flow were reduced to 34.7% (5.56 s–1) for the BS model, 9.2% (1.48 s–1) for the FD model, and 2.7% (0.43 s–1) for the MCS model with respect to the unstented condition (16.04 s–1) at a Reynolds number of 600. Considering that the flow reduction property of the MCS model is three times higher than that of the FD model, it is clear that the MCS facilitates more reliable IA embolization than FD.","PeriodicalId":39272,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biorheology","volume":"32 1","pages":"20-25"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.17106/JBR.32.20","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biorheology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17106/JBR.32.20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

We have developed a microporous covered stent (MCS) for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms (IAs). MCS promotes intentional thrombosis in the IA by blood stagnation and facilitates IA embolization treatment by clotting of whole blood in the IA. Flow reduction is a key property of such stent-type IA embolization devices. In this study, we evaluated the flow reduction property of MCS, and compered that of a general balloon expandable stent (bare stent, BS) for supporting a stenotic vessel and a typical flow diverter stent (FD) for IA treatment. This was carried out using particle imaging velocimetry (PIV) and an in vitro flow simulator with a saccular IA and straight parent vessel model. The PIV results show that the area mean shear rates in the IA flow were reduced to 34.7% (5.56 s–1) for the BS model, 9.2% (1.48 s–1) for the FD model, and 2.7% (0.43 s–1) for the MCS model with respect to the unstented condition (16.04 s–1) at a Reynolds number of 600. Considering that the flow reduction property of the MCS model is three times higher than that of the FD model, it is clear that the MCS facilitates more reliable IA embolization than FD.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
微孔覆膜支架治疗颅内动脉瘤的流体力学评价:颗粒成像测速与体外血流模拟器对两种支架减流性能的比较
我们开发了一种微孔覆盖支架(MCS)用于治疗颅内动脉瘤(IAs)。MCS通过血液停滞促进内室有意血栓形成,并通过内室全血凝固促进内室栓塞治疗。血流减少是这种支架型IA栓塞装置的一个关键特性。在本研究中,我们评估了MCS的血流减少性能,并比较了用于支持狭窄血管的一般球囊可膨胀支架(裸支架,BS)和用于IA治疗的典型分流支架(FD)的血流减少性能。采用颗粒成像测速仪(PIV)和体外流动模拟器进行实验,该模拟器具有囊状IA和直母血管模型。PIV结果表明,相对于未支架条件下(16.04 s-1),雷诺数为600时,BS模型的IA流面积平均剪切率为34.7% (5.56 s-1), FD模型的面积平均剪切率为9.2% (1.48 s-1), MCS模型的面积平均剪切率为2.7% (0.43 s-1)。考虑到MCS模型的流量减少性能是FD模型的3倍,显然MCS比FD更能实现可靠的IA栓塞。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Biorheology
Journal of Biorheology Engineering-Mechanical Engineering
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
期刊最新文献
Red cell distribution width in cardiac diseases: Role of hemorheology and chronic inflammation Investigation of erythrocyte aggregation parameters of blood with low levels of fibrinogen by syllectometry Influence of different outflow boundary conditions on hemodynamic analysis of cerebral aneurysm Effect of O2 concentration on arteriole diameter near stimulated neurons in the cortex Historical overview and future perspective of the percutaneous coronary intervention with special emphasis on the development of coronary stent
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1