Slavonia and Transylvania (1272-1342)

Q3 Arts and Humanities Povijesni Prilozi Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.22586/pp.v40i61.15481
Antun Nekić
{"title":"Slavonia and Transylvania (1272-1342)","authors":"Antun Nekić","doi":"10.22586/pp.v40i61.15481","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Historians have long identified the structural similarities between the positions of Slavonia and Transylvania within the conglomerate of territories bound to the Crown of St Stephen (Archiregnum Hungaricum), but their comparison has never surpassed the superficial level of juxtaposing the quasi-regal authorities of the ban and the voivode. Considering the period from the 1270s until the 1340s this paper primarily focuses on the general assemblies that took place in these two provinces and looks at the formation of regional identities linked to the nobility’s collective action of coming together in assemblies. Through this prism, it also analyzes the functioning of composite political structures and the relationship between the center and the specific localities. Political instability triggered the first assemblies in both provinces, and from the 1270s until the 1290s local processes mirrored the decisions and actions of the royal court, as was the case with almost all the assemblies held in Slavonia during the 1270s, and it was the same with the Transylvanian cases form 1288 and 1291. However, in Transylvania, in contrast to Slavonia, the assemblies continued to be held without the incentive from the royal court, that is they became a part of the local repertoire. These different experiences in the early period had a strong impact on the nobility and its power of collective action from the 1320s when the programme of the restoration of the royal authority was carried out in both provinces by using the same mechanisms.","PeriodicalId":52430,"journal":{"name":"Povijesni Prilozi","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Povijesni Prilozi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22586/pp.v40i61.15481","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Historians have long identified the structural similarities between the positions of Slavonia and Transylvania within the conglomerate of territories bound to the Crown of St Stephen (Archiregnum Hungaricum), but their comparison has never surpassed the superficial level of juxtaposing the quasi-regal authorities of the ban and the voivode. Considering the period from the 1270s until the 1340s this paper primarily focuses on the general assemblies that took place in these two provinces and looks at the formation of regional identities linked to the nobility’s collective action of coming together in assemblies. Through this prism, it also analyzes the functioning of composite political structures and the relationship between the center and the specific localities. Political instability triggered the first assemblies in both provinces, and from the 1270s until the 1290s local processes mirrored the decisions and actions of the royal court, as was the case with almost all the assemblies held in Slavonia during the 1270s, and it was the same with the Transylvanian cases form 1288 and 1291. However, in Transylvania, in contrast to Slavonia, the assemblies continued to be held without the incentive from the royal court, that is they became a part of the local repertoire. These different experiences in the early period had a strong impact on the nobility and its power of collective action from the 1320s when the programme of the restoration of the royal authority was carried out in both provinces by using the same mechanisms.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
斯拉沃尼亚和特兰西瓦尼亚(1272-1342)
历史学家很早就发现了斯拉沃尼亚和特兰西瓦尼亚在圣斯蒂芬王权(Archiregnum Hungaricum)管辖范围内的地位在结构上的相似之处,但它们的比较从来没有超越将ban和voivode的准王权并列的肤浅水平。考虑到从1270年代到1340年代这段时间,本文主要关注这两个省的议会大会,并关注与贵族集体行动有关的地区身份的形成。通过这一棱镜,分析了复合政治结构的功能以及中央与具体地方的关系。政治不稳定引发了这两个省的第一次议会,从1270年代到1290年代,地方程序反映了皇家法院的决定和行动,就像1270年代在斯拉沃尼亚举行的几乎所有议会一样,1288年和1291年的特兰西瓦尼亚案件也是如此。然而,在特兰西瓦尼亚,与斯拉沃尼亚不同,集会在没有王室鼓励的情况下继续举行,也就是说,它们成为了当地剧目的一部分。早期的这些不同经历对贵族及其集体行动的力量产生了强烈影响从1320年代开始,恢复王权的计划在两个省通过相同的机制实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Povijesni Prilozi
Povijesni Prilozi Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
期刊最新文献
Prilog poznavanju gradskoga statuta, notarijata i službe kancelara u Baru Pravni okvir oduzimanja imovine u kontekstu Zrinsko-frankopanske urote Djevojačka četvrtina Podvornici i pedeli Kraljevskoga sveučilišta Franje Josipa I. u Zagrebu 1874. – 1918. Franjo Vuletić’s Slovnica jezika bosanskoga and Its Place among Croatian Grammars
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1