Panorama histórico da formação dos professores de ciências

Claudení Marques Santos, Lucia Helena Pralon de Souza
{"title":"Panorama histórico da formação dos professores de ciências","authors":"Claudení Marques Santos, Lucia Helena Pralon de Souza","doi":"10.22294/eduper/ppge/ufv.v10i0.7096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article intends to understand how the Laws of the Guidelines and Bases of the National Education (LDB) and respective amendments has contemplated the training of teachers of sciences and biology teachers pointing out the main problems and implications, from a historical perspective. Through documentary and bibliographical analysis it was highlighted that there is a historical heritage in the degree of the “3 + 1” model, characterized as an appendix of the bachelor’s degree, leading to the non-identification of the profile of the trained teacher; the knowledge separation in scientific and pedagogical of this model further fragmented the curriculum of the course; the poor quality of the teacher license (degrees) created mainly through private initiative after LDB/96 formed disqualified teachers hindering the learning of the teaching. Ultimately, current modifications in LDB went back by attesting to the possibility of assigning teaching to people with “notorious knowledge”. The relevance of resorting to legal texts is highlighted, since the way in which teacher training is approached also reveals the importance attributed to this field by the set of social groups as a whole.","PeriodicalId":31461,"journal":{"name":"Educacao em Perspectiva","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educacao em Perspectiva","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22294/eduper/ppge/ufv.v10i0.7096","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article intends to understand how the Laws of the Guidelines and Bases of the National Education (LDB) and respective amendments has contemplated the training of teachers of sciences and biology teachers pointing out the main problems and implications, from a historical perspective. Through documentary and bibliographical analysis it was highlighted that there is a historical heritage in the degree of the “3 + 1” model, characterized as an appendix of the bachelor’s degree, leading to the non-identification of the profile of the trained teacher; the knowledge separation in scientific and pedagogical of this model further fragmented the curriculum of the course; the poor quality of the teacher license (degrees) created mainly through private initiative after LDB/96 formed disqualified teachers hindering the learning of the teaching. Ultimately, current modifications in LDB went back by attesting to the possibility of assigning teaching to people with “notorious knowledge”. The relevance of resorting to legal texts is highlighted, since the way in which teacher training is approached also reveals the importance attributed to this field by the set of social groups as a whole.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
科学教师培训的历史概况
本文试图从历史的角度,了解《国民教育指导性法》和《国民教育基础法》及其修正案对理科教师和生物教师培养的思考,指出其中的主要问题和启示。通过文献和文献分析,强调了“3 + 1”学位模式的历史遗产,其特点是作为学士学位的附录,导致培训教师的个人资料不确定;这种模式的科学知识与教学知识的分离,进一步割裂了课程设置;LDB/96形成后,主要通过私人主动创造的教师执照(学位)质量不合格,阻碍了教学的学习。最终,LDB目前的修改通过证明将教学分配给具有“臭名昭著的知识”的人的可能性而回归。强调了诉诸法律文本的相关性,因为教师培训的方式也揭示了整个社会群体对这一领域的重视。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Raça, classe e gênero ordem dos fatores não altera o resultado? pedagogia universitária e a formação de professores para a educação básica atuação do gestor escolar no enfrentamento da evasão no ensino médio da rede estadual paulista A formação e o desenvolvimento profissional docente: controvérsias, desafios e perspectivas
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1