Determining PES compliance in sectoral acts connected to forestry

A. Markovic, L. Keča
{"title":"Determining PES compliance in sectoral acts connected to forestry","authors":"A. Markovic, L. Keča","doi":"10.2298/gsf2021061m","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the ways to preserve nature and ecosystems from a group of market mechanisms is a mechanism called Payments for Ecosystem Services - PES. In this paper, sectoral laws related to forestry and nature protection are analyzed to determine whether the existing legislation has elements that are similar to PES and support its implementation or are closer to the principle of ?command and control?. Three acts were selected for analysis: the Forest law, the Water law, and the Environmental Protection Act. These are the three sectoral acts that are closely related to nature conservation policy, with forest and water systems being the largest suppliers of ecosystem services and the most common subject of PES schemes. The aim of this research is to find those articles of these laws that contain the basic elements of the PES definition, by using certain keywords to search for articles of the acts. Qualitative and quantitative content analysis was used for the analysis. First, keywords were identified to distinguish the articles of acts that are relevant to the research itself, and later the meaning of each article was transformed into one or more terms called ?determinants?. In this way, the meaning of the articles was determined and quantified to determine if there was a number of articles that overlapped with the PES principles to some extent. In this research, we found that there are very few articles and parts of the legislation that fully support PES, and ecosystems and ecosystem services are not explicitly linked to valuation and funding. In each of the acts in the chapters related to financing, there are elements of PES and there is some form of financing of activities aimed at preserving and improving the ecosystems and the environment. The closest to the PES is the Water law. The Forest law has certain disadvantages, as funds are collected from sources that have no connection with forest ecosystems, and EPA is based on the ?Polluter pays? principle and is farthest from the PES concept.","PeriodicalId":30149,"journal":{"name":"Glasnik Sumarskog Fakulteta Univerzitet u Beogradu","volume":"1 1","pages":"61-90"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Glasnik Sumarskog Fakulteta Univerzitet u Beogradu","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2298/gsf2021061m","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

One of the ways to preserve nature and ecosystems from a group of market mechanisms is a mechanism called Payments for Ecosystem Services - PES. In this paper, sectoral laws related to forestry and nature protection are analyzed to determine whether the existing legislation has elements that are similar to PES and support its implementation or are closer to the principle of ?command and control?. Three acts were selected for analysis: the Forest law, the Water law, and the Environmental Protection Act. These are the three sectoral acts that are closely related to nature conservation policy, with forest and water systems being the largest suppliers of ecosystem services and the most common subject of PES schemes. The aim of this research is to find those articles of these laws that contain the basic elements of the PES definition, by using certain keywords to search for articles of the acts. Qualitative and quantitative content analysis was used for the analysis. First, keywords were identified to distinguish the articles of acts that are relevant to the research itself, and later the meaning of each article was transformed into one or more terms called ?determinants?. In this way, the meaning of the articles was determined and quantified to determine if there was a number of articles that overlapped with the PES principles to some extent. In this research, we found that there are very few articles and parts of the legislation that fully support PES, and ecosystems and ecosystem services are not explicitly linked to valuation and funding. In each of the acts in the chapters related to financing, there are elements of PES and there is some form of financing of activities aimed at preserving and improving the ecosystems and the environment. The closest to the PES is the Water law. The Forest law has certain disadvantages, as funds are collected from sources that have no connection with forest ecosystems, and EPA is based on the ?Polluter pays? principle and is farthest from the PES concept.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
确定与林业有关的部门行为是否符合PES
从一组市场机制中保护自然和生态系统的方法之一是一种称为生态系统服务支付(PES)的机制。本文分析了与林业和自然保护有关的部门法律,以确定现有立法是否具有与PES类似并支持其实施的要素,或者更接近于“指挥和控制”原则。选取了三部法案进行分析:森林法、水法和环境保护法。这是与自然保护政策密切相关的三个部门性法案,森林和水系统是生态系统服务的最大提供者,也是生态系统资源计划最常见的主题。本研究的目的是通过使用一定的关键词来搜索这些法律的条款,找到那些包含PES定义的基本要素的法律条款。采用定性和定量含量分析方法进行分析。首先,确定关键词以区分与研究本身相关的法案条款,然后将每篇文章的含义转化为一个或多个称为“决定因素”的术语。通过这种方式,确定和量化了条款的含义,以确定是否有一些条款在一定程度上与PES原则重叠。在这项研究中,我们发现立法中很少有文章和部分完全支持PES,生态系统和生态系统服务没有明确地与估值和融资联系起来。在与筹资有关的各章中的每一项行动中,都有个人利益和个人利益的要素,并为旨在保护和改善生态系统和环境的活动提供某种形式的资金。最接近PES的是水法。《森林法》有一定的缺点,因为资金的来源与森林生态系统无关,而环保署的基础是“污染者付费”。原理,离PES概念最远。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊最新文献
Determining PES compliance in sectoral acts connected to forestry Urban nature as a response to stress of urban population An analysis of the trend of protected area size in Serbia in the period from 1948 to 2016 DTM models to enhance planning of timber harvesting The effect of shoulder on the strength of the oval tenon-mortise joint
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1