The Power to Define Offenses Against the Law of Nations

IF 0.6 4区 社会学 Q2 LAW Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy Pub Date : 2016-10-04 DOI:10.2139/SSRN.2810911
Alex H. Loomis
{"title":"The Power to Define Offenses Against the Law of Nations","authors":"Alex H. Loomis","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2810911","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Congress has the power to “define and punish...Offenses against the Law of Nations.” This clause clearly empowers Congress to punish universally recognized offenses under international law, piracy being one obvious example. But Congress also has the power to “define” offenses against the law of nations. Surely punishing an offense presupposes defining it. So what does “define” add?This paper provides an answer. The Constitution’s text and structure, early constitutional history, and modern foreign relations doctrine all suggest that Congress has the power to define offenses against the law of nations that preexisting international law does not proscribe. Congress may pass laws prohibiting private conduct that violates international law, as well as any private conduct that the United States has an international duty to punish. It can also punish offenses if it is ambiguous whether international law requires it too. Congress probably even has the power to create new offenses in order to foster changes in customary international law.","PeriodicalId":46083,"journal":{"name":"Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy","volume":"40 1","pages":"417"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2810911","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Congress has the power to “define and punish...Offenses against the Law of Nations.” This clause clearly empowers Congress to punish universally recognized offenses under international law, piracy being one obvious example. But Congress also has the power to “define” offenses against the law of nations. Surely punishing an offense presupposes defining it. So what does “define” add?This paper provides an answer. The Constitution’s text and structure, early constitutional history, and modern foreign relations doctrine all suggest that Congress has the power to define offenses against the law of nations that preexisting international law does not proscribe. Congress may pass laws prohibiting private conduct that violates international law, as well as any private conduct that the United States has an international duty to punish. It can also punish offenses if it is ambiguous whether international law requires it too. Congress probably even has the power to create new offenses in order to foster changes in customary international law.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
界定违反国际法之罪的权力
国会有权“定义和惩罚……违反国际法的罪行。”这一条款明确授权国会根据国际法惩罚普遍公认的罪行,海盗行为就是一个明显的例子。但国会也有权“定义”违反国际法的罪行。当然,惩罚一项罪行的前提是要给它下定义。那么define加了什么呢?本文提供了一个答案。宪法的文本和结构、早期宪法历史和现代外交原则都表明,国会有权定义先前存在的国际法不禁止的违反国内法的罪行。国会可以通过法律,禁止违反国际法的私人行为,以及美国有国际责任惩罚的任何私人行为。如果国际法是否也有这样的要求,它也可以惩罚违法行为。国会甚至可能有权力创造新的罪行,以促进习惯国际法的变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy is published three times annually by the Harvard Society for Law & Public Policy, Inc., an organization of Harvard Law School students. The Journal is one of the most widely circulated student-edited law reviews and the nation’s leading forum for conservative and libertarian legal scholarship. The late Stephen Eberhard and former Senator and Secretary of Energy E. Spencer Abraham founded the journal twenty-eight years ago and many journal alumni have risen to prominent legal positions in the government and at the nation’s top law firms.
期刊最新文献
The Presumption of Constitutionality Immigration, Freedom, and the Constitution Business Transactions and President Trump's 'Emoluments' Problem Free Expression on Campus: Mitigating the Costs of Contentious Speakers Revitalizing the Clemency Process
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1