The Power of Insults

IF 1.6 3区 社会学 Q1 LAW Boston University Law Review Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI:10.2139/ssrn.3535975
R. Colker
{"title":"The Power of Insults","authors":"R. Colker","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3535975","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Insults work on both a structural level and a personal level. This Article argues that the economic and political power elite has effectively hurled insults at civil rights activists, plaintiffs, and their lawyers to undermine civil rights reform. It has long been understood that the civil rights community must engage in cultural, political, and legal work to attain effective reforms. But insufficient attention has been paid to how the power elite uses the cultural tool of insults to undermine these reforms. Limitations on effective civil rights reform range from constraints on the private attorney general model of enforcement to the ban on the Legal Services Corporation’s use of class action lawsuits. Insults have played an important and previously unrecognized role in the creation of these limitations. After discussing the undertheorized phenomenon of the power of public insults, this Article presents a case study of defense pleadings filed in accessibility cases brought under the Americans with Disabilities Act. These pleadings reflect how defendants can use insults as part of their litigation strategy to make it difficult for plaintiffs to attain effective relief under a statute designed to create structural reform. Rather than worrying about whether civil rights activists should go high when the power elite goes low, this Article argues that it is crucial that civil rights statutes be constructed with a stronger foundation. Then, plaintiffs will be better  Distinguished University Professor & Heck-Faust Memorial Chair in Constitutional Law, Moritz College of Law, The Ohio State University. I would like to thank the Center for Law, Policy, and Social Science at The Ohio State University for its generous support of this project. I would like to thank attorney and disability activist Amy Robertson for bringing this problem to my attention and helping me find examples. I would also like to thank my Moritz research assistants: MacKenzie Boyd, Stacey Dettwiller, Emily Durell, Kelsie Hendren, and Lindsey Woods. This Article has also benefited from feedback from Amna Akbar, Amy Cohen, Rosalind Dixon, Doron Dorfman, Jasmine Harris, David Levine, Arlene Mayerson, Courtlyn Roser-Jones, Marc Spindelman, and Dan Tokaji, as well as the participants at the 2019 AALS Disability Law Panel, 2019 Berkeley Center for the Study of Law and Society Workshop, 2019 Moritz Faculty Workshop, and 2019 University of New South Wales Faculty Workshop. Finally, this Article has benefited from the research assistance of Stephanie Ziegler of the Moritz Law Library and the secretarial assistance of Allyson Hennelly. 2 BOSTON UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW [Vol. 100:1 able to withstand the barrage of insults they typically encounter when seeking effective relief. Straw houses are too easy to blow down. 2020] THE POWER OF INSULTS 3","PeriodicalId":47323,"journal":{"name":"Boston University Law Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Boston University Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3535975","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Insults work on both a structural level and a personal level. This Article argues that the economic and political power elite has effectively hurled insults at civil rights activists, plaintiffs, and their lawyers to undermine civil rights reform. It has long been understood that the civil rights community must engage in cultural, political, and legal work to attain effective reforms. But insufficient attention has been paid to how the power elite uses the cultural tool of insults to undermine these reforms. Limitations on effective civil rights reform range from constraints on the private attorney general model of enforcement to the ban on the Legal Services Corporation’s use of class action lawsuits. Insults have played an important and previously unrecognized role in the creation of these limitations. After discussing the undertheorized phenomenon of the power of public insults, this Article presents a case study of defense pleadings filed in accessibility cases brought under the Americans with Disabilities Act. These pleadings reflect how defendants can use insults as part of their litigation strategy to make it difficult for plaintiffs to attain effective relief under a statute designed to create structural reform. Rather than worrying about whether civil rights activists should go high when the power elite goes low, this Article argues that it is crucial that civil rights statutes be constructed with a stronger foundation. Then, plaintiffs will be better  Distinguished University Professor & Heck-Faust Memorial Chair in Constitutional Law, Moritz College of Law, The Ohio State University. I would like to thank the Center for Law, Policy, and Social Science at The Ohio State University for its generous support of this project. I would like to thank attorney and disability activist Amy Robertson for bringing this problem to my attention and helping me find examples. I would also like to thank my Moritz research assistants: MacKenzie Boyd, Stacey Dettwiller, Emily Durell, Kelsie Hendren, and Lindsey Woods. This Article has also benefited from feedback from Amna Akbar, Amy Cohen, Rosalind Dixon, Doron Dorfman, Jasmine Harris, David Levine, Arlene Mayerson, Courtlyn Roser-Jones, Marc Spindelman, and Dan Tokaji, as well as the participants at the 2019 AALS Disability Law Panel, 2019 Berkeley Center for the Study of Law and Society Workshop, 2019 Moritz Faculty Workshop, and 2019 University of New South Wales Faculty Workshop. Finally, this Article has benefited from the research assistance of Stephanie Ziegler of the Moritz Law Library and the secretarial assistance of Allyson Hennelly. 2 BOSTON UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW [Vol. 100:1 able to withstand the barrage of insults they typically encounter when seeking effective relief. Straw houses are too easy to blow down. 2020] THE POWER OF INSULTS 3
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
侮辱的力量
侮辱在结构层面和个人层面都起作用。本文认为,经济和政治权力精英实际上对民权活动家、原告及其律师进行了侮辱,以破坏民权改革。人们早就认识到,民权团体必须参与文化、政治和法律工作,以实现有效的改革。但是,对于权力精英如何利用侮辱这一文化工具来破坏这些改革,人们却没有给予足够的关注。对有效的民权改革的限制包括对私人司法部长执行模式的限制,以及对法律服务公司使用集体诉讼的禁令。侮辱在这些限制的产生中发挥了重要的作用,而这是以前未被认识到的。在讨论了公众侮辱的力量这一未被理论化的现象之后,本文对根据《美国残疾人法案》提起的无障碍案件中的辩护诉状进行了案例研究。这些诉状反映了被告如何利用侮辱作为其诉讼策略的一部分,使原告难以根据旨在进行结构性改革的法规获得有效救济。本文并不担心当权力精英走向低谷时,民权活动家是否应该走高,而是认为民权法规的构建必须有一个更坚实的基础。然后,原告将被任命为俄亥俄州立大学莫里茨法学院杰出大学教授和赫克-福斯特宪法纪念主席。我要感谢俄亥俄州立大学法律、政策和社会科学中心对这个项目的慷慨支持。我要感谢律师和残疾人活动家艾米·罗伯逊让我注意到这个问题,并帮助我找到例子。我还要感谢我在莫里茨的研究助理:麦肯齐·博伊德,斯泰西·德特威勒,艾米丽·杜雷尔,凯尔茜·亨德伦和林赛·伍兹。本文还受益于Amna Akbar、Amy Cohen、Rosalind Dixon、Doron Dorfman、Jasmine Harris、David Levine、Arlene Mayerson、Courtlyn rose - jones、Marc Spindelman和Dan Tokaji以及2019年AALS残疾法小组、2019年伯克利法律与社会研究中心研讨会、2019年莫里茨教师研讨会和2019年新南威尔士大学教师研讨会的参与者的反馈。最后,本文得益于莫里茨法律图书馆的斯蒂芬妮·齐格勒(Stephanie Ziegler)的研究协助和艾莉森·亨内利(Allyson Hennelly)的秘书协助。2《波士顿大学法律评论》[卷100:1]能够承受他们在寻求有效救济时通常遇到的一连串侮辱。稻草屋太容易被吹倒了。2020]侮辱的力量
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
5.90%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Boston University Law Review provides analysis and commentary on all areas of the law. Published six times a year, the Law Review contains articles contributed by law professors and practicing attorneys from all over the world, along with notes written by student members.
期刊最新文献
The Power of Insults Death of a Copyright Is patent enforcement efficient? A Government of Laws and Not of Machines Civilizing Criminal Settlements
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1