Understanding Aesthetic Radicalism: Alexander Blok and Wallace Stevens

Q4 Arts and Humanities Literatura dvukh Amerik Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.22455/2541-7894-2022-12-158-174
T. Venediktova
{"title":"Understanding Aesthetic Radicalism: Alexander Blok and Wallace Stevens","authors":"T. Venediktova","doi":"10.22455/2541-7894-2022-12-158-174","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aesthetic radicalism characteristic of the modernist literary culture is explored in the work of Alexander Blok (1880 –1921) and Wallace Stevens (1879 –1955). Poetic imagination, Stevens wrote, is “always at the end of the era” — the two poets shared a sense of writing from a hiatus between no longer and not yet. Both were fascinated, however distantly, by radical ideologies of their time, particularly the power to produce and propagate heroic myth. Heroic visionaries are defined by the “warlike attitude” (R.W. Emerson), the oppositional stance that causes an enhancement and a reduction of imagination. The image of modern heroics in Blok’s and Stevens’ poetry is associated metaphorically with the energizing and deadening effect of the cold. In such poems as “The Twelve,” “The Snow man” and other the breakthrough to “absolute” reality is imagined as a result of the violent self-abstraction from all settled contexts and all subjective values. It is fraught with risk and associated, by Block, with the ability to hear the music of being through the noises of the time or, by Stevens, with the directness of seeing “things as they are.” Trust in the possibility of such a breakthrough, accompanied by the understanding of its utter impossibility is a characteristic paradox of the culture of modernism. It is most vividly observed as we compare the creative strategies of the two poets, however distant they are culturally.","PeriodicalId":34458,"journal":{"name":"Literatura dvukh Amerik","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Literatura dvukh Amerik","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22455/2541-7894-2022-12-158-174","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aesthetic radicalism characteristic of the modernist literary culture is explored in the work of Alexander Blok (1880 –1921) and Wallace Stevens (1879 –1955). Poetic imagination, Stevens wrote, is “always at the end of the era” — the two poets shared a sense of writing from a hiatus between no longer and not yet. Both were fascinated, however distantly, by radical ideologies of their time, particularly the power to produce and propagate heroic myth. Heroic visionaries are defined by the “warlike attitude” (R.W. Emerson), the oppositional stance that causes an enhancement and a reduction of imagination. The image of modern heroics in Blok’s and Stevens’ poetry is associated metaphorically with the energizing and deadening effect of the cold. In such poems as “The Twelve,” “The Snow man” and other the breakthrough to “absolute” reality is imagined as a result of the violent self-abstraction from all settled contexts and all subjective values. It is fraught with risk and associated, by Block, with the ability to hear the music of being through the noises of the time or, by Stevens, with the directness of seeing “things as they are.” Trust in the possibility of such a breakthrough, accompanied by the understanding of its utter impossibility is a characteristic paradox of the culture of modernism. It is most vividly observed as we compare the creative strategies of the two poets, however distant they are culturally.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
理解审美激进主义:亚历山大·布洛克和华莱士·史蒂文斯
亚历山大·布洛克(1880 -1921)和华莱士·史蒂文斯(1879 -1955)的作品探讨了现代主义文学文化的审美激进主义特征。史蒂文斯写道,诗意的想象“总是在时代的尽头”——这两位诗人在“不再”和“尚未”之间有一种共同的写作感觉。他们都被当时的激进意识形态所吸引,尤其是产生和传播英雄神话的力量。英雄的梦想家被定义为“好战的态度”(R.W.爱默生),这种对立的立场导致想象力的增强和减少。布洛克和史蒂文斯诗歌中的现代英雄形象隐喻地与寒冷的活力和麻木联系在一起。在《十二人》、《雪人》等诗歌中,对“绝对”现实的突破被想象为对所有既定语境和所有主观价值的暴力自我抽象的结果。它充满了风险,在布洛克看来,它让人能够从时代的噪音中听到存在的音乐;在史蒂文斯看来,它让人能够直接看到“事物的本来面貌”。对这种突破的可能性的信任,伴随着对其完全不可能的理解,是现代主义文化的一个典型悖论。当我们比较这两位诗人的创作策略时,无论他们在文化上有多么遥远,这一点都是最生动的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Erskine Caldwell in Wartime Moscow, May – September 1941 Erskine Caldwell and the Soviet Union: Correspondence of 1935–1943 Howard Fast and Soviet Writers. Article 1. “A Friendly Hand Reaching Out Across the Ocean”: 1949–1955 On the Wreckage of the Bastille of Rhymes The Great Pasha, Buried Alive: The Archetypes of the Characters in Truman Capote’s Story “A Tree of Night”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1