Rituals of Spring in Hope Mirlees’s Paris and T.S. Eliot’s The Waste Land

Q4 Arts and Humanities Literatura dvukh Amerik Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.22455/2541-7894-2022-13-9-60
Olga M. Ushakova
{"title":"Rituals of Spring in Hope Mirlees’s Paris and T.S. Eliot’s The Waste Land","authors":"Olga M. Ushakova","doi":"10.22455/2541-7894-2022-13-9-60","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper offers the comparative study of two poems: Paris by Hope Mirrlees (1920) and The Waste Land by T.S. Eliot (1922). The research aims to consider Paris as one of the key works of modernist poetry and a possible model for The Waste Land. The author of the paper turns to some parallels confirming the similarity of these two poetic texts. Particular attention is paid to the “anthropological” or “ritualistic” mode of both poems. The philosophical concept and poetic structure of these poems were based on the ideas presented in the books and research papers by the representatives of Cambridge anthropological school (J.G. Frazer, J.E. Harrison, J.L. Weston, etc.). Both poems could be considered in the context of modern anthropological and psychoanalytic theories. The ritualistic mode of the texts not only provides scientific grounds for the embodiment of personal and collective experience in poetry but creates a powerful vital impulse inherent in those archaic rituals, the elements of which were reconstructed by the poets. The works of J.G. Frazer, J.E. Harrison, J.L. Weston, and others help the readers to comprehend and expand the content of certain episodes, clarify “dark” places, to see a harmonious poetic structure and sophisticated concept of the world order, civilization and man behind the external arbitrariness and fragmentation. Both Paris and The Waste Land became manifestations and embodiments of the “mythological method” articulated by Eliot in 1923.","PeriodicalId":34458,"journal":{"name":"Literatura dvukh Amerik","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Literatura dvukh Amerik","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22455/2541-7894-2022-13-9-60","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The paper offers the comparative study of two poems: Paris by Hope Mirrlees (1920) and The Waste Land by T.S. Eliot (1922). The research aims to consider Paris as one of the key works of modernist poetry and a possible model for The Waste Land. The author of the paper turns to some parallels confirming the similarity of these two poetic texts. Particular attention is paid to the “anthropological” or “ritualistic” mode of both poems. The philosophical concept and poetic structure of these poems were based on the ideas presented in the books and research papers by the representatives of Cambridge anthropological school (J.G. Frazer, J.E. Harrison, J.L. Weston, etc.). Both poems could be considered in the context of modern anthropological and psychoanalytic theories. The ritualistic mode of the texts not only provides scientific grounds for the embodiment of personal and collective experience in poetry but creates a powerful vital impulse inherent in those archaic rituals, the elements of which were reconstructed by the poets. The works of J.G. Frazer, J.E. Harrison, J.L. Weston, and others help the readers to comprehend and expand the content of certain episodes, clarify “dark” places, to see a harmonious poetic structure and sophisticated concept of the world order, civilization and man behind the external arbitrariness and fragmentation. Both Paris and The Waste Land became manifestations and embodiments of the “mythological method” articulated by Eliot in 1923.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
米利斯的《巴黎》和T.S.艾略特的《荒原》中春天的仪式
本文对霍普·莫里斯的《巴黎》(1920)和T.S.艾略特的《荒原》(1922)两首诗进行了比较研究。本研究旨在将《巴黎》视为现代主义诗歌的重要作品之一,并将其视为《荒原》的可能典范。本文的作者转向一些相似之处来证实这两个诗歌文本的相似性。特别注意的是这两首诗的“人类学”或“仪式”模式。这些诗歌的哲学概念和诗歌结构是基于剑桥人类学学派代表人物(J.G.弗雷泽、J.E.哈里森、J.L.韦斯顿等)在书籍和研究论文中提出的观点。这两首诗都可以放在现代人类学和精神分析理论的背景下考虑。文本的仪式模式不仅为个人和集体经验在诗歌中的体现提供了科学依据,而且在这些古老的仪式中创造了一种强大的生命冲动,这些仪式的要素被诗人重建。J.G.弗雷泽、J.E.哈里森、J.L.韦斯顿等人的作品帮助读者理解和拓展了某些情节的内容,厘清了“黑暗”的地方,看到了外在随意性和碎片化背后和谐的诗意结构和复杂的世界秩序、文明和人的概念。《巴黎》和《荒原》都是艾略特在1923年提出的“神话方法”的表现和体现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Erskine Caldwell in Wartime Moscow, May – September 1941 Erskine Caldwell and the Soviet Union: Correspondence of 1935–1943 Howard Fast and Soviet Writers. Article 1. “A Friendly Hand Reaching Out Across the Ocean”: 1949–1955 On the Wreckage of the Bastille of Rhymes The Great Pasha, Buried Alive: The Archetypes of the Characters in Truman Capote’s Story “A Tree of Night”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1