Ever Closer Union? Norges tilknytning til EUs klimaregelverk

IF 0.2 4区 社会学 Q4 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS Internasjonal Politikk Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.23865/intpol.v80.3674
Lars H. Gulbrandsen, Erlend A. T. Hermansen
{"title":"Ever Closer Union? Norges tilknytning til EUs klimaregelverk","authors":"Lars H. Gulbrandsen, Erlend A. T. Hermansen","doi":"10.23865/intpol.v80.3674","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"in English Ever Closer Union? Norway’s Climate Collaboration with the EU Norwegian climate policy has increasingly become closely linked to EU climate regulations. This article analyzes how and why Norway has linked its climate policy to the EU’s and what room for maneuvering the cooperation with the EU gives Norwegian authorities. Through the EEA agreement, the EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS) has covered about half of Norway’s emissions, mainly from industry and the petroleum sector, since 2008. Since 2021, non-ETS emissions from transport, agriculture, construction and waste have also been covered by a separate time-limited agreement with the EU, as a supplement to the EEA agreement. This cooperation obliges Norway to cut emissions every year until 2030. The agreement also binds Norway to comply with EU regulations for the emissions and uptake of greenhouse gases related to forests and other land use. In practice, Norway is fully obliged to comply with the EU’s climate policy regulations until 2030. The analysis shows that this close connection has increased the political pressure to cut greenhouse gas emissions domestically. At the same time, Norway has chosen to keep all flexibility options open to implement the cuts in the EU instead. Whether these opportunities will be used is largely a political question that probably will shape the climate debate until 2030. The final design and structure of the EU’s Green Deal and Norway’s connection to it will also affect the maneuvering room for climate cuts at home versus abroad.","PeriodicalId":42131,"journal":{"name":"Internasjonal Politikk","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internasjonal Politikk","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23865/intpol.v80.3674","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

in English Ever Closer Union? Norway’s Climate Collaboration with the EU Norwegian climate policy has increasingly become closely linked to EU climate regulations. This article analyzes how and why Norway has linked its climate policy to the EU’s and what room for maneuvering the cooperation with the EU gives Norwegian authorities. Through the EEA agreement, the EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS) has covered about half of Norway’s emissions, mainly from industry and the petroleum sector, since 2008. Since 2021, non-ETS emissions from transport, agriculture, construction and waste have also been covered by a separate time-limited agreement with the EU, as a supplement to the EEA agreement. This cooperation obliges Norway to cut emissions every year until 2030. The agreement also binds Norway to comply with EU regulations for the emissions and uptake of greenhouse gases related to forests and other land use. In practice, Norway is fully obliged to comply with the EU’s climate policy regulations until 2030. The analysis shows that this close connection has increased the political pressure to cut greenhouse gas emissions domestically. At the same time, Norway has chosen to keep all flexibility options open to implement the cuts in the EU instead. Whether these opportunities will be used is largely a political question that probably will shape the climate debate until 2030. The final design and structure of the EU’s Green Deal and Norway’s connection to it will also affect the maneuvering room for climate cuts at home versus abroad.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
更紧密的联盟?挪威与美国气候工作的联系
更紧密的联盟?挪威的气候政策日益与欧盟的气候法规紧密相连。本文分析了挪威如何以及为什么将其气候政策与欧盟联系起来,以及与欧盟的合作为挪威当局提供了什么样的操纵空间。自2008年以来,通过EEA协议,欧盟排放交易体系(EU ETS)覆盖了挪威约一半的排放量,主要来自工业和石油部门。自2021年起,作为欧洲经济区协议的补充,来自交通、农业、建筑和废物的非ets排放也被纳入与欧盟的单独限时协议。这项合作要求挪威在2030年之前每年减少排放量。该协议还要求挪威遵守欧盟关于与森林和其他土地利用有关的温室气体排放和吸收的规定。实际上,挪威在2030年之前完全有义务遵守欧盟的气候政策规定。分析表明,这种紧密联系增加了国内减少温室气体排放的政治压力。与此同时,挪威选择保留所有灵活的选择,以在欧盟实施削减。是否利用这些机会在很大程度上是一个政治问题,可能会影响到2030年之前的气候辩论。欧盟绿色协议的最终设计和结构,以及挪威与该协议的关系,也将影响国内外气候减排的回旋余地。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
50.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊介绍: Fagartiklene i dette nummeret illustrerer på fin måte bredden i fagfeltet internasjonal politikk. Øystein Jensens artikkel om kontinentalsokkelens avgrensning i nord tar opp et helt sentralt emne i den dagsaktuelle norske utenrikspolitikken, norsk nordområdepolitikk. Koblingen mellom folkerett og naturressurser finner vi enda klarere uttrykt i Hans Morten Haugens artikkel, selv om det geografiske nedslagsfeltet her er Vest-Sahara, ikke Norge. I sin artikkel om Malteserordenen som ikke-territoriell politisk aktør presenterer Douglas Brommesson en empirisk inngang til debattene om "den nye middelalderen". Samlet illustrerer disse tre artiklene hvordan analyser som tangerer fag som historie og folkerett gir nye perspektiver til fagfeltet internasjonal politikk.
期刊最新文献
Innenfor eller utenfor: Rammene for arbeidslivspolitikk ved ulike EU-tilknytninger Landbruks- og fiskerinæringene i Norge: Klart utenfor, men stadig mer innenfor EU? EUs utenriks- og sikkerhetspolitikk og implikasjoner for Norge Norge og EU: Betydningen av medlemskap I blindsonen av norsk EU-debatt: EUs helseberedskap i kjølvannet av koronapandemien
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1