An Evil Letter, and the Destinies of the Forgotten Passacaglia. The Twilight of the Third Symphony “Ovid” by Sigismund Toduță

Ecaterina Banciu
{"title":"An Evil Letter, and the Destinies of the Forgotten Passacaglia. The Twilight of the Third Symphony “Ovid” by Sigismund Toduță","authors":"Ecaterina Banciu","doi":"10.24193/subbmusica.2022.2.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\"The author does not intend to write a booklet about the Symphony No. 3 “Ovid” (1957) by Sigismund Toduță, but rather to complete the missing pieces of its history. Still in 2004, the manuscript of the symphony’s finale was still missing. With its discovery in 2013, research confirmed its uniqueness and originality. Now, in 2022, at the 30th anniversary of the establishment of the Toduță Foundation, we reveal those derogatory remarks that led to the ‘amputated’ publication of the Passacaglia followed by the symphony’s fade into oblivion. All began with a young university assistant from Bucharest who addressed a letter to the only Romanian citizen with a PhD in music (Rome, 1933), the nationally and internationally recognized composer, awarded by George Enescu himself. How did this 28 years old juvenile dare to write to the 51 years old master in such a defamatory tone? If it was part of a political task, whom did it serve? Who had anything to gain by removing from the Romanian musical heritage this remarkable work, composed on the two-millennium anniversary of Ovid’s birth - the adored but banished poet? Would it be fair to respect the composer’s wish and forget this troublesome Passacaglia? Wouldn’t it be a mistake against the creation itself, which once born, deserves publicity? With these questions this paper reconstructs the events, still leaving in the twilight the truth behind the faces of Ovid. Keywords: originality, paraphrase, pastiche, restorations, rehabilitations, re-editing \"","PeriodicalId":40238,"journal":{"name":"Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai Musica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai Musica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24193/subbmusica.2022.2.04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MUSIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

"The author does not intend to write a booklet about the Symphony No. 3 “Ovid” (1957) by Sigismund Toduță, but rather to complete the missing pieces of its history. Still in 2004, the manuscript of the symphony’s finale was still missing. With its discovery in 2013, research confirmed its uniqueness and originality. Now, in 2022, at the 30th anniversary of the establishment of the Toduță Foundation, we reveal those derogatory remarks that led to the ‘amputated’ publication of the Passacaglia followed by the symphony’s fade into oblivion. All began with a young university assistant from Bucharest who addressed a letter to the only Romanian citizen with a PhD in music (Rome, 1933), the nationally and internationally recognized composer, awarded by George Enescu himself. How did this 28 years old juvenile dare to write to the 51 years old master in such a defamatory tone? If it was part of a political task, whom did it serve? Who had anything to gain by removing from the Romanian musical heritage this remarkable work, composed on the two-millennium anniversary of Ovid’s birth - the adored but banished poet? Would it be fair to respect the composer’s wish and forget this troublesome Passacaglia? Wouldn’t it be a mistake against the creation itself, which once born, deserves publicity? With these questions this paper reconstructs the events, still leaving in the twilight the truth behind the faces of Ovid. Keywords: originality, paraphrase, pastiche, restorations, rehabilitations, re-editing "
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一封邪恶的信,和被遗忘的帕萨卡利亚的命运。西吉斯蒙德的第三交响曲《奥维德》的黄昏Toduță
作者并不是想写一本关于西吉斯蒙德的第三交响曲《奥维德》(1957年)Toduță的小册子,而是想填补这段历史上缺失的部分。直到2004年,交响曲最后一曲的手稿仍然下落不明。随着2013年的发现,研究证实了它的独特性和原创性。现在,在2022年,在Toduță基金会成立30周年之际,我们揭露了那些贬损的言论,这些言论导致了《帕萨卡利亚》的“截肢”出版,随后交响曲被遗忘。这一切都始于一位来自布加勒斯特的年轻大学助理,他给唯一一位拥有音乐博士学位的罗马尼亚公民(罗马,1933年)写了一封信,他是国内和国际公认的作曲家,由乔治·埃内斯库亲自授予。这个28岁的少年怎么敢用这种诽谤的口吻给51岁的老爷写信?如果它是政治任务的一部分,它为谁服务?从罗马尼亚音乐遗产中删除这部杰出的作品对谁有什么好处呢?这部作品是在奥维德诞生2000周年之际创作的,奥维德是一位受人崇拜却被放逐的诗人。尊重作曲家的意愿,忘记这首麻烦的帕萨卡利亚,这样公平吗?对创作本身来说,这不是一个错误吗?一旦诞生,就值得宣传。带着这些疑问,本文重构了这些事件,仍然在暮色中留下奥维德面孔背后的真相。关键词:原创性,意译,仿作,修复,修复,重新编辑
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
期刊最新文献
Music Quotation in Contemporary Non-Academic Art: Aspects of Genre and Style Transformation Sopranotronics 101. An Analytical Approach With Repertorial Proposal Exploring Learning and Unlearning in Singing Technique (Breath) Sándor Veress’s Threnos in the Light of ‘Tradition’ and ‘Renewal’ “Adieux à Bach”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1