GEOTECHNICAL PARAMETER ASSESSMENT AND BEARING CAPACITY ANALYSIS FOR THE FOUNDATION DESIGN

Khaleel Hussain, Dou Bin, Ali Asghar, Javid Hussain, Sayed Muhammad Iqbal, Syed Yasir Ali Shah, Sartaj Hussain
{"title":"GEOTECHNICAL PARAMETER ASSESSMENT AND BEARING CAPACITY ANALYSIS FOR THE FOUNDATION DESIGN","authors":"Khaleel Hussain, Dou Bin, Ali Asghar, Javid Hussain, Sayed Muhammad Iqbal, Syed Yasir Ali Shah, Sartaj Hussain","doi":"10.26480/esmy.02.2022.136.145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The main objective of this research is to determine the soil appropriateness for the construction of buildings, and it encompasses site investigation, a preliminary process for collecting geological, geotechnical, and other engineering information for safe and economical building design. Site investigation provides insight into unforeseen engineering problems; therefore, instability issues can be forestalled if done thoroughly. Residual soils from the research area comprise many clays, some of which can expand upon moisture increase. Therefore, a site investigation must be carried out to assess the site’s suitability for the proposed construction. The research includes nine boreholes and laboratory testing demonstrating the soil profile and bearing capacity within the settlement limit. The site’s soil is yellowish-brown, weathered, thickly bedded, loosely cemented, friable sandstone consisting of poorly graded sand (SP) and silt/sand (SP-SM) with clayey layers (ML-CL). Uniaxial compressive strength was recorded at 217 to 1238 kPa under natural and saturated conditions. Furthermore, the computed bearing capacity varies from 2.8 to 6.1 tsf using the Terzaghi approach, 7.1 to 8.0 tsf using Bowel’s method, and 4.7 to 5.4 tsf using the Meyerhof method. The coefficient of subgrade reaction for an isolated and raft foundation based on Bowels bearing capacity varies between 24.8 to 26.1 MN/m3 to 13.6 to 15.4 MN/m3, respectively. Based on the investigation and lab testing, a raft foundation would be appropriate for the structure. The proposed construction location didn’t find any significant geological defects; thus, it’s suitable for the construction of buildings. However, the paper’s recommendations must be implemented.","PeriodicalId":53062,"journal":{"name":"Earth Science Malaysia","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earth Science Malaysia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26480/esmy.02.2022.136.145","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The main objective of this research is to determine the soil appropriateness for the construction of buildings, and it encompasses site investigation, a preliminary process for collecting geological, geotechnical, and other engineering information for safe and economical building design. Site investigation provides insight into unforeseen engineering problems; therefore, instability issues can be forestalled if done thoroughly. Residual soils from the research area comprise many clays, some of which can expand upon moisture increase. Therefore, a site investigation must be carried out to assess the site’s suitability for the proposed construction. The research includes nine boreholes and laboratory testing demonstrating the soil profile and bearing capacity within the settlement limit. The site’s soil is yellowish-brown, weathered, thickly bedded, loosely cemented, friable sandstone consisting of poorly graded sand (SP) and silt/sand (SP-SM) with clayey layers (ML-CL). Uniaxial compressive strength was recorded at 217 to 1238 kPa under natural and saturated conditions. Furthermore, the computed bearing capacity varies from 2.8 to 6.1 tsf using the Terzaghi approach, 7.1 to 8.0 tsf using Bowel’s method, and 4.7 to 5.4 tsf using the Meyerhof method. The coefficient of subgrade reaction for an isolated and raft foundation based on Bowels bearing capacity varies between 24.8 to 26.1 MN/m3 to 13.6 to 15.4 MN/m3, respectively. Based on the investigation and lab testing, a raft foundation would be appropriate for the structure. The proposed construction location didn’t find any significant geological defects; thus, it’s suitable for the construction of buildings. However, the paper’s recommendations must be implemented.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基础设计的岩土参数评估与承载力分析
本研究的主要目的是确定建筑物建设的土壤适宜性,它包括现场调查,收集地质,岩土和其他工程信息的初步过程,以实现安全和经济的建筑设计。现场调查提供了对未预见的工程问题的洞察;因此,如果做得彻底,可以预防不稳定问题。研究区残积土含有多种粘土,其中一些粘土在水分增加后会膨胀。因此,必须进行地盘调查,以评估该地盘是否适合兴建拟议工程。研究包括9个钻孔和室内试验,证明了沉降极限内的土壤剖面和承载力。该地点的土壤是黄褐色、风化、厚层、松散胶结、易碎的砂岩,由分级差的砂(SP)和淤泥/砂(SP- sm)和粘土层(ML-CL)组成。在自然和饱和条件下,单轴抗压强度为217 ~ 1238 kPa。此外,使用Terzaghi方法计算的承载力范围为2.8至6.1 tsf,使用肠法计算的承载力范围为7.1至8.0 tsf,使用Meyerhof方法计算的承载力范围为4.7至5.4 tsf。基于土体承载力计算的隔震地基和筏板地基反力系数分别为24.8 ~ 26.1 MN/m3和13.6 ~ 15.4 MN/m3。根据调查和实验室测试,筏板基础将适用于该结构。拟建地点未发现重大地质缺陷;因此,它适用于建筑施工。然而,该文件的建议必须得到实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF STATIC SHEAR MODULUS AND DYNAMIC SHEAR MODULUS DETERMINED BY GEOPHYSICAL AND GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION PETROLOGICAL AND MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF THE DAHOMEYAN GRANITIC ROCKS – A CASE STUDY AT GREEN VALLEY AND AKROFU GEOTECHNICAL PARAMETER ASSESSMENT AND BEARING CAPACITY ANALYSIS FOR THE FOUNDATION DESIGN PREDICTION OF POROSITY OF RESERVOIR SANDS USING SEISMIC ATTRIBUTES IN “ARIKE” FIELD NIGER DELTA, NIGERIA PHYSIOCHEMICAL ANALYSIS OF SELECTED GROUNDWATER SAMPLES IN PART OF PORT HARCOURT, RIVERS STATE NIGERIA
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1