Najwyższy dostojnik autonomii. Instytucja marszałka krajowego w Galicji (1861–1920)

IF 0.1 Q4 LAW Przeglad Sejmowy Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.31268/ps.2022.115
Damian Szymczak
{"title":"Najwyższy dostojnik autonomii. Instytucja marszałka krajowego w Galicji (1861–1920)","authors":"Damian Szymczak","doi":"10.31268/ps.2022.115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"At the early 1860s, the Habsburg Monarchy underwent a period of a profound reforms. These resulted in the birth of a constitutional monarchy and modern parliamentarism. Bodies of self-government were established in the individual provinces of the state. In Galicia, the National Sejm and the National Department, which was the executive organ of the Sejm, were established. Both of these institutions were headed by the Galician National Marshal, who in theory held the highest position in the Galician self-government, but in reality, had very limited powers. The actual rule in the province was exercised by the royal-imperial governor. Until the very end of the Habsburg Monarchy the Polish politicians unsuccessfully tried to raise the status of the office of National Marshal. They even failed to introduce the principle of his election by the Sejm. In total, 11 people held the post of National Marshal. It is a certain phenomenon that this institution survived the Habsburg Monarchy. The last National Marshal had to resign from the office in 1920.","PeriodicalId":42093,"journal":{"name":"Przeglad Sejmowy","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Przeglad Sejmowy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31268/ps.2022.115","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

At the early 1860s, the Habsburg Monarchy underwent a period of a profound reforms. These resulted in the birth of a constitutional monarchy and modern parliamentarism. Bodies of self-government were established in the individual provinces of the state. In Galicia, the National Sejm and the National Department, which was the executive organ of the Sejm, were established. Both of these institutions were headed by the Galician National Marshal, who in theory held the highest position in the Galician self-government, but in reality, had very limited powers. The actual rule in the province was exercised by the royal-imperial governor. Until the very end of the Habsburg Monarchy the Polish politicians unsuccessfully tried to raise the status of the office of National Marshal. They even failed to introduce the principle of his election by the Sejm. In total, 11 people held the post of National Marshal. It is a certain phenomenon that this institution survived the Habsburg Monarchy. The last National Marshal had to resign from the office in 1920.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自治的最高政要。加利西亚国家元帅学会(1861-1920)
19世纪60年代初,哈布斯堡王朝经历了一段深刻的改革时期。这导致了君主立宪制和现代议会制的诞生。在国家的各个省份建立了自治机构。在加利西亚,设立了国民瑟姆和作为瑟姆执行机关的国家部。这两个机构都由加利西亚国家元帅领导,理论上,他在加利西亚自治政府中处于最高地位,但实际上,他的权力非常有限。该省的实际统治是由皇家总督行使的。直到哈布斯堡王朝的末期,波兰的政治家们都没有成功地试图提高国家元帅的地位。他们甚至没有提出由众议院选举的原则。总共有11人担任过国家元帅。这个制度在哈布斯堡王朝幸存下来,这是一个特定的现象。最后一位国家元帅不得不在1920年辞职。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
39
期刊最新文献
Nowa Zelandia: Wyrok Sądu Najwyższego z dnia 21 listopada 2022 r. w sprawie Make It 16 Incorporated vs. Attorney-General (dotyczący wieku uprawniającego do głosowania w wyborach), sygn. akt SC 14/2022 Dopuszczalność odwołania od uchwał Krajowej Rady Sądownictwa w sprawach przeniesienia sędziego do innego wydziału Posłanka Wanda Ładzina (1880–1966) i jej działalność w Polsce i we Francji Uczestnictwo Sejmu i Senatu w procedurze kontroli przestrzegania zasady subsydiarności a przyszłość parlamentów narodowych w procesach decyzyjnych Unii Europejskiej Uzasadnienie orzeczeń sądowych – wybrane problemy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1