Traditional and European Oriented Principles in the Codification of Administrative Procedures in Central Eastern Europe

IF 0.3 Q4 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION Croatian and Comparative Public Administration Pub Date : 2022-05-02 DOI:10.31297/hkju.22.1.6
P. Kovač
{"title":"Traditional and European Oriented Principles in the Codification of Administrative Procedures in Central Eastern Europe","authors":"P. Kovač","doi":"10.31297/hkju.22.1.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The demanding and changing societal environment brings the necessity of public administration reforms in various aspects. This is even more emphasised in Central Eastern Europe (CEE), which can be attributed to the still ongoing transition. Administrative procedures and their codification change over time, which also applies to the basic principles related thereto. The article presents the development of such principles in national APAs of Slovenia (from 1999), Czech Republic (2004), Croatia (2009), and Hungary (2016), in line with EU development guidelines, particularly Art. 41 of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights that envisages the right to good administration. The basic principles embedded in national APAs constitute value-based guidelines that apply both to the drafting and to the interpretation of rules relevant for any type of administrative decision and any stage of procedure. The author finds that more recent APAs in Central Eastern Europe present an evident trend towards governing the administrative procedure and the basic principles more comprehensively, with due account of the more contemporary elements, such as proportionality among principles and cooperation among authorities. Another common denominator is complementing the traditional Rechtsstaat principles with more modern ones, in the sense of greater partnership among all stakeholders in administrative relationships. This points to a positive surpassing of historical legacies of European development, although at the same time there is evidence of interference with the administrative procedure as a tool of democracy, mainly as a result of political aspirations or trends to increase the efficiency of public policies. Hence, in the Member States, classical and modern principles should be codified and interpreted holistically, in the light of the values of the EU","PeriodicalId":42223,"journal":{"name":"Croatian and Comparative Public Administration","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Croatian and Comparative Public Administration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31297/hkju.22.1.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The demanding and changing societal environment brings the necessity of public administration reforms in various aspects. This is even more emphasised in Central Eastern Europe (CEE), which can be attributed to the still ongoing transition. Administrative procedures and their codification change over time, which also applies to the basic principles related thereto. The article presents the development of such principles in national APAs of Slovenia (from 1999), Czech Republic (2004), Croatia (2009), and Hungary (2016), in line with EU development guidelines, particularly Art. 41 of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights that envisages the right to good administration. The basic principles embedded in national APAs constitute value-based guidelines that apply both to the drafting and to the interpretation of rules relevant for any type of administrative decision and any stage of procedure. The author finds that more recent APAs in Central Eastern Europe present an evident trend towards governing the administrative procedure and the basic principles more comprehensively, with due account of the more contemporary elements, such as proportionality among principles and cooperation among authorities. Another common denominator is complementing the traditional Rechtsstaat principles with more modern ones, in the sense of greater partnership among all stakeholders in administrative relationships. This points to a positive surpassing of historical legacies of European development, although at the same time there is evidence of interference with the administrative procedure as a tool of democracy, mainly as a result of political aspirations or trends to increase the efficiency of public policies. Hence, in the Member States, classical and modern principles should be codified and interpreted holistically, in the light of the values of the EU
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中东欧行政程序法典化中的传统原则与欧洲原则
不断变化的社会环境带来了公共行政各方面改革的必要性。这一点在中欧东欧(CEE)更为突出,这可以归因于仍在进行的转型。行政程序及其编纂随时间而变化,这也适用于与之有关的基本原则。本文介绍了这些原则在斯洛文尼亚(1999年起)、捷克共和国(2004年)、克罗地亚(2009年)和匈牙利(2016年)的国家行动纲领中的发展,这些原则符合欧盟的发展指导方针,特别是《欧盟基本权利宪章》第41条,该条设想了良好的行政管理权。国家行动纲领所载的基本原则构成了基于价值的准则,既适用于起草和解释与任何类型的行政决定和任何程序阶段有关的规则。作者认为,中欧东欧最近的行动纲领有一种明显的趋势,即更全面地管理行政程序和基本原则,同时适当考虑到更现代的因素,例如原则之间的相称性和当局之间的合作。另一个共同点是,在行政关系中所有利益攸关方之间建立更大的伙伴关系的意义上,用更现代的原则补充传统的国家管理原则。这表明欧洲发展的历史遗产得到了积极的超越,尽管同时有证据表明,作为民主工具的行政程序受到了干扰,这主要是由于提高公共政策效率的政治愿望或趋势。因此,在成员国中,应该根据欧盟的价值观,将古典和现代原则编纂和整体解释
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
25.00%
发文量
12
期刊最新文献
Integration of Effectiveness and Efficiency Indicators of State Support for Projects and Programmes for the Development of Higher Education in Russia Istraživanje korištenja usluga sustava e-Građani kod mladih – primjer grada Zadra Sudjelovanje u troškovima zdravstvene zaštite iz obveznog zdravstvenog osiguranja Preparation for Old Age and Ageing in the Time of the First Czechoslovak Republic Public and Private Law Aspects of Breach of the Concession Contract in Slovenian Law
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1