Occupational health and safety specialist in Croatian and Portuguese legislation

IF 0.3 Q3 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY Zbornik Veleucilista u Rijeci-Journal of the Polytechnics of Rijeka Pub Date : 2020-06-30 DOI:10.31784/zvr.8.1.24
Domagoj Šantek, Sandra Debeljak, R. Isidoro
{"title":"Occupational\nhealth and safety specialist in Croatian and Portuguese legislation","authors":"Domagoj Šantek, Sandra Debeljak, R. Isidoro","doi":"10.31784/zvr.8.1.24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The domain of occupational safety and health at work is put for regulation through directives by founding agreements. This means that the institutions of the European Union prescribe minimum standards of safety and health at work through directives and Member States need to accomplish goals that a particular directive pursues. At the same time, this means that each Member State can also set stricter standards than the ones prescribed through directives and for this reason some differences in regulations of individual Member States can be noticed. In this paper, authors focus on the role of occupational safety specialist and the manner in which the Republic of Croatia and the Portuguese Republic, in their legislation, prescribe obligations of the employer in terms of contracting the performance of occupational health and safety tasks with an occupational safety specialist or an external service. Authors furthermore examine required conditions which occupational safety specialist must meet to perform those tasks. Apart from outlining the Croatian and Portuguese legislation, authors also present and define fundamental similarities and differences in the regulations within this domain of security legislation.","PeriodicalId":40998,"journal":{"name":"Zbornik Veleucilista u Rijeci-Journal of the Polytechnics of Rijeka","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.31784/zvr.8.1.24","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zbornik Veleucilista u Rijeci-Journal of the Polytechnics of Rijeka","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31784/zvr.8.1.24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The domain of occupational safety and health at work is put for regulation through directives by founding agreements. This means that the institutions of the European Union prescribe minimum standards of safety and health at work through directives and Member States need to accomplish goals that a particular directive pursues. At the same time, this means that each Member State can also set stricter standards than the ones prescribed through directives and for this reason some differences in regulations of individual Member States can be noticed. In this paper, authors focus on the role of occupational safety specialist and the manner in which the Republic of Croatia and the Portuguese Republic, in their legislation, prescribe obligations of the employer in terms of contracting the performance of occupational health and safety tasks with an occupational safety specialist or an external service. Authors furthermore examine required conditions which occupational safety specialist must meet to perform those tasks. Apart from outlining the Croatian and Portuguese legislation, authors also present and define fundamental similarities and differences in the regulations within this domain of security legislation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
克罗地亚和葡萄牙立法方面的职业健康和安全专家
工作场所的职业安全和健康领域是通过创立协定的指令加以管理的。这意味着,欧洲联盟各机构通过指令规定了工作安全和健康的最低标准,成员国需要实现某一指令所追求的目标。同时,这意味着每个成员国也可以制定比指令规定的标准更严格的标准,因此可以注意到个别成员国的法规存在一些差异。在本文中,作者着重讨论了职业安全专家的作用以及克罗地亚共和国和葡萄牙共和国在其立法中规定雇主在与职业安全专家或外部服务机构签订合同履行职业健康和安全任务方面的义务的方式。作者进一步审查了职业安全专家执行这些任务必须满足的条件。除了概述克罗地亚和葡萄牙的立法外,作者还提出并界定了这一安全立法领域内各项条例的基本相同点和不同点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
25.00%
发文量
2
期刊最新文献
Determinante potpore lokalnog stanovništva razvoju turizma Controlling 4.0 in times of new technologies application Istraživanje utjecaja pandemije COVID-19 na moderno vodstvo i promjenu paradigme HRM-a Using mobile applications for language learning as part of language classes The significance of cross-cultural barriers in organizational communication
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1