Doctor-Patient Relationships: A Puzzle of Fragmented Knowledge

J. Turabián
{"title":"Doctor-Patient Relationships: A Puzzle of Fragmented Knowledge","authors":"J. Turabián","doi":"10.29011/2688-7460.100028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The doctor-patient relationship has been and remains a keystone of care. But, there are many ways of understanding, classifying and practicing the doctor-patient relationship. In this scenario, this article begins the task of organizing the different ways of understanding, naming, differentiating, classifying and practicing the doctor-patient relationship. It is concluded that the following concepts can be differentiated: 1) Hierarchy of complexity dimensions of the doctor-patient continuity relationship; 2) According to historical stages; 3) According to the degree of interpersonal relationship; 4) According to the control exercised by the physician or the patient; 5) According to the level of participation; 6) According to the “creators of contexts” models); 7) According to the length of interpersonal continuity; 8) According to pharmacological prescriptions; 9) According to the characteristics of medical service; 10) According to the psychosocial aspects of diseases; 11) According to age; and 12) Doctor-patient relationship with patients and special situations: emigrants, foreigners, patient with ill-defined symptoms, with the insane, with the psychotic, with the patient with visual or hearing impairment, at home, with differences of race, social class, gender, etc.). It is concluded that the doctor-patient relationship is a complex, multiple and heterogeneous concept that cannot be defined in a unique way or generalize the concept of “good” relationship, but there are “many doctorpatient relationships” appropriate according to their contexts, which also implies redefining the instruments for measuring this relationship.","PeriodicalId":93553,"journal":{"name":"Family medicine and primary care -- open access","volume":"44 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family medicine and primary care -- open access","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29011/2688-7460.100028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

The doctor-patient relationship has been and remains a keystone of care. But, there are many ways of understanding, classifying and practicing the doctor-patient relationship. In this scenario, this article begins the task of organizing the different ways of understanding, naming, differentiating, classifying and practicing the doctor-patient relationship. It is concluded that the following concepts can be differentiated: 1) Hierarchy of complexity dimensions of the doctor-patient continuity relationship; 2) According to historical stages; 3) According to the degree of interpersonal relationship; 4) According to the control exercised by the physician or the patient; 5) According to the level of participation; 6) According to the “creators of contexts” models); 7) According to the length of interpersonal continuity; 8) According to pharmacological prescriptions; 9) According to the characteristics of medical service; 10) According to the psychosocial aspects of diseases; 11) According to age; and 12) Doctor-patient relationship with patients and special situations: emigrants, foreigners, patient with ill-defined symptoms, with the insane, with the psychotic, with the patient with visual or hearing impairment, at home, with differences of race, social class, gender, etc.). It is concluded that the doctor-patient relationship is a complex, multiple and heterogeneous concept that cannot be defined in a unique way or generalize the concept of “good” relationship, but there are “many doctorpatient relationships” appropriate according to their contexts, which also implies redefining the instruments for measuring this relationship.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医患关系:碎片化知识的谜题
医患关系一直是并且仍然是医疗的基石。但是,认识、分类和实践医患关系的方法有很多。在这种情况下,本文开始组织理解、命名、区分、分类和实践医患关系的不同方式。结果表明,可以区分以下概念:1)医患连续性关系的复杂性维度层次;2)按历史阶段划分;3)根据人际关系的程度;4)根据医生或患者的控制;5)根据参与程度;(6)根据“情境创造者”模型);7)根据人际关系连续性的长短;8)按药理学处方;9)根据医疗服务的特点;10)根据疾病的社会心理方面;11)按年龄分;(12)与患者的医患关系和特殊情况:移民、外国人、症状不明确的患者、精神病患者、精神病患者、视力或听力障碍患者、在家中、不同种族、社会阶层、性别等)。结论是,医患关系是一个复杂、多元和异构的概念,不能以一种独特的方式定义或概括“良好”关系的概念,但根据其上下文存在“许多医患关系”,这也意味着重新定义衡量这种关系的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Polishing Resident Advocacy Curriculums in Primary Care Feasibility and Utility of Point-Of-Care Ultrasound (POCUS) in Primary Care Practice. EKOAP Pilot Study Right Cornual Pregnancy: A Case Report and Review of Literature Appropriateness of Antimicrobial Therapy for Treatment of Acute Tonsillitis at Primary Care level in Qatar- Clinical Audit Report Validation of a Novel Point-of-Care Testing Device Designed for Assessment of NT-pro BNP
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1