RELIGIOUS CONCEPTUALIZATION OF THE TEACHINGS OF INNOKENTY GIEZEL ON MORALITY

O. Tsisar
{"title":"RELIGIOUS CONCEPTUALIZATION OF THE TEACHINGS OF INNOKENTY GIEZEL ON MORALITY","authors":"O. Tsisar","doi":"10.33930/ed.2019.5007.41(7-9)-11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Innokenty Gizel played a prominent role in cultural and religious movements in Ukrainian lands in the middle of the 17th century. However, the life and work of this church figure, writer, philosopher and theologian remained out of the attention of researchers for a long time. The same can be said about the treatise «Peace with God to a Man», published with the blessing of Innokenty Gizel and under his editorship. The treatise «Peace with God for a Man» should be considered as an exposition of religious and moral norms inherent in Christianity. By religious morality we mean a set of concepts and principles that are conditioned by a religious worldview. Religious morality is interpreted as having a divine origin. However, its norms depend in a certain way on socio-cultural circumstances. This is what is substantiated in the treatise «Peace with God to a Man». A lot of attention is paid to the problems of good and evil, moral virtues and vices, sinfulness, as well as moral duty. Such an orientation was intended to expand the range of cultural assets that could be used by the Orthodox. As a rule, researchers consider the treatise «Peace with God to a Man» and the work of Innokenty Gizel in general in the context of Ukrainian Baroque culture. In the treatise «Peace with God for a Man», Innokenty Gizel gives a broad classification of sins as moral defects, which are interpreted from a theological point of view. In the foreground are sins of a religious or purely ecclesiastical nature. Then there are sins that concern worldly life, in particular, family relationships, the activities of people of various statuses and professions. It is worth noting that it is generally problematic to clearly distinguish the religious and secular components in the interpretation of sins in the treatise «Peace with God to a Husband». Considering religious and ecclesiastical sins, Innokenty Gisel, despite referring to the Bible and the works of the Fathers of the Church, relies on the realities of life in Ukraine at that time. When analyzing universal (common) sins, he appeals not only to his contemporary realities, but also to church tradition, and emphasizes religious aspects. Innokenty Gisel assumed that the basis of social relations is the family. In the treatise «Peace with God for a Husband» a lot of attention is paid to family sins. Giving preference to the patriarchal family, he still advocated the humane attitude of men to women, for harmonious moral relations. The treatise pays attention to children, their upbringing, instilling in them good customs and faith in God. The main social force in the treatise «Peace with God to a Man» is the Orthodox clergy. It is structured, divided into bishops and monks. The main mass is white parish clergy. Innokenty Gisel knew well the life of the Ukrainian Orthodox clergy, the violations and defects inherent in its environment. When describing the sins of spiritual persons, he relied mainly on the realities of his time. I understood that the clergy, being influenced by trade and market relations, increasingly began to «serve mammon». Innokenty Gisel describes the sins of the worldly people separately for each condition. He draws attention to the fact that those in power treat their subjects humanely. He calls on the representatives of the social classes to respect the authorities and their masters, not to raise riots or uprisings.","PeriodicalId":52865,"journal":{"name":"Osvitnii diskurs","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Osvitnii diskurs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33930/ed.2019.5007.41(7-9)-11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Innokenty Gizel played a prominent role in cultural and religious movements in Ukrainian lands in the middle of the 17th century. However, the life and work of this church figure, writer, philosopher and theologian remained out of the attention of researchers for a long time. The same can be said about the treatise «Peace with God to a Man», published with the blessing of Innokenty Gizel and under his editorship. The treatise «Peace with God for a Man» should be considered as an exposition of religious and moral norms inherent in Christianity. By religious morality we mean a set of concepts and principles that are conditioned by a religious worldview. Religious morality is interpreted as having a divine origin. However, its norms depend in a certain way on socio-cultural circumstances. This is what is substantiated in the treatise «Peace with God to a Man». A lot of attention is paid to the problems of good and evil, moral virtues and vices, sinfulness, as well as moral duty. Such an orientation was intended to expand the range of cultural assets that could be used by the Orthodox. As a rule, researchers consider the treatise «Peace with God to a Man» and the work of Innokenty Gizel in general in the context of Ukrainian Baroque culture. In the treatise «Peace with God for a Man», Innokenty Gizel gives a broad classification of sins as moral defects, which are interpreted from a theological point of view. In the foreground are sins of a religious or purely ecclesiastical nature. Then there are sins that concern worldly life, in particular, family relationships, the activities of people of various statuses and professions. It is worth noting that it is generally problematic to clearly distinguish the religious and secular components in the interpretation of sins in the treatise «Peace with God to a Husband». Considering religious and ecclesiastical sins, Innokenty Gisel, despite referring to the Bible and the works of the Fathers of the Church, relies on the realities of life in Ukraine at that time. When analyzing universal (common) sins, he appeals not only to his contemporary realities, but also to church tradition, and emphasizes religious aspects. Innokenty Gisel assumed that the basis of social relations is the family. In the treatise «Peace with God for a Husband» a lot of attention is paid to family sins. Giving preference to the patriarchal family, he still advocated the humane attitude of men to women, for harmonious moral relations. The treatise pays attention to children, their upbringing, instilling in them good customs and faith in God. The main social force in the treatise «Peace with God to a Man» is the Orthodox clergy. It is structured, divided into bishops and monks. The main mass is white parish clergy. Innokenty Gisel knew well the life of the Ukrainian Orthodox clergy, the violations and defects inherent in its environment. When describing the sins of spiritual persons, he relied mainly on the realities of his time. I understood that the clergy, being influenced by trade and market relations, increasingly began to «serve mammon». Innokenty Gisel describes the sins of the worldly people separately for each condition. He draws attention to the fact that those in power treat their subjects humanely. He calls on the representatives of the social classes to respect the authorities and their masters, not to raise riots or uprisings.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
宗教概念化的教导无辜的吉泽尔道德
因诺肯季·吉泽尔在17世纪中期乌克兰土地上的文化和宗教运动中发挥了突出作用。然而,这位教会人物、作家、哲学家和神学家的生活和工作在很长一段时间里都没有受到研究者的关注。在Innokenty Gizel的祝福和他的编辑下出版的论文《与上帝和平相处》也是如此。论文《与上帝和平相处》应该被认为是对基督教固有的宗教和道德规范的阐述。所谓宗教道德,我们指的是一套以宗教世界观为条件的概念和原则。宗教道德被解释为具有神圣的起源。然而,其规范在某种程度上取决于社会文化环境。这是在论文《与上帝和平相处》中得到证实的。很多注意力都放在了善与恶,道德美德与罪恶,罪性,以及道德责任上。这样的定位是为了扩大东正教可以使用的文化资产的范围。一般来说,研究人员认为论文《与上帝和平相处》和Innokenty Gizel在乌克兰巴洛克文化背景下的工作。在论文《与上帝和平相处的人》中,Innokenty Gizel给出了罪恶作为道德缺陷的广泛分类,并从神学的角度进行了解释。前景是宗教或纯粹教会性质的罪。还有一些罪与世俗生活有关,特别是家庭关系、各种地位和职业的人的活动。值得注意的是,在《与上帝与丈夫和平相处》这篇论文中,在对罪的解释中,明确区分宗教和世俗成分通常是有问题的。考虑到宗教和教会的罪恶,Innokenty Gisel尽管参考了圣经和教会教父的作品,但却依赖于当时乌克兰生活的现实。在分析普遍的罪恶时,他不仅求助于他的当代现实,而且求助于教会传统,并强调宗教方面。因诺肯蒂·吉塞尔认为社会关系的基础是家庭。在论文«与上帝和平与丈夫»很多关注的是家庭的罪恶。他在崇尚父权家庭的同时,还提倡以人道的态度对待女性,追求和谐的道德关系。这篇论文关注儿童,他们的成长,向他们灌输良好的习俗和对上帝的信仰。在论文《与上帝和平相处》中,主要的社会力量是东正教神职人员。它的结构,分为主教和僧侣。参加弥撒的主要是教区的白人神职人员。因诺肯季·吉塞尔非常了解乌克兰东正教神职人员的生活,以及其环境中固有的侵犯和缺陷。在描述属灵之人的罪时,他主要依靠他那个时代的现实。我明白神职人员受到贸易和市场关系的影响,越来越多地开始“为财神服务”。Innokenty Gisel分别描述了世俗人在不同情况下的罪。他让人们注意到当权者仁慈地对待他们的臣民。他呼吁社会各阶层的代表尊重当局和他们的主人,不要制造骚乱或起义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
FROM HIPPOCRATES’ ETHICS TO V. R. POTTER’S GLOBAL BIOETHICS: EDUCATIONAL ASPECTS EDUCATIONAL MOBILITY AS AN IMPLEMENTATION OF THE “WORLD – MAN” PROJECT IN THE CONTEXT OF THE FLOODING PRESENT COMMUNICATIVE PRACTICES OF THE 19TH CENTURY, OR SOMETHING ABOUT THEIR BENEFITS AND HARMS FOR THE POST-INDUSTRIAL ERA DIGITAL RIGHTS AS AN EXPRESSION OF DIGITAL HUMAN ATTRIBUTES: A SOCIO-PHILOSOPHICAL EDUCATION THE EXTERMINATION THE SYMBOLS OF IDENTITY AS THE DESTRACTION OF THE HUMAN PERSONALITY
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1