{"title":"Hjalmar Sundén’s Impact on the Study of Religion in the Nordic Countries","authors":"Tomas Lindgren","doi":"10.33356/TEMENOS.46249","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article, I discuss Hjalmar Sunden’s theoretical and methodological contributions to the psychological study of religion in the Nordic countries, including a discussion of role theory and Sunden’s way of conducting (and presenting) his research. Nordic scholars’ use of role theory is analyzed and discussed. My analysis of the state of research reveals that the use of role theory reached its peak during the 1970s. Scholarly interest in the theory declined during the 1980s, and has been virtually abandoned since the mid-1990s. In these earlier studies, the theory was primarily used to elucidate the psychological dynamic of various religious phenomena, rather than to test the theory systematically against data. However, these scholars gave the theory an empirical underpinning, and identified details in the theory that needed to be refined and revised. I propose several possible reasons for the decline in scholarly interest in role theory. Finally, I suggest that Sunden’s methodological contributions may have had a bigger impact on the study of religion than his theoretical contributions.","PeriodicalId":43012,"journal":{"name":"TEMENOS","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2014-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TEMENOS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33356/TEMENOS.46249","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Abstract
In this article, I discuss Hjalmar Sunden’s theoretical and methodological contributions to the psychological study of religion in the Nordic countries, including a discussion of role theory and Sunden’s way of conducting (and presenting) his research. Nordic scholars’ use of role theory is analyzed and discussed. My analysis of the state of research reveals that the use of role theory reached its peak during the 1970s. Scholarly interest in the theory declined during the 1980s, and has been virtually abandoned since the mid-1990s. In these earlier studies, the theory was primarily used to elucidate the psychological dynamic of various religious phenomena, rather than to test the theory systematically against data. However, these scholars gave the theory an empirical underpinning, and identified details in the theory that needed to be refined and revised. I propose several possible reasons for the decline in scholarly interest in role theory. Finally, I suggest that Sunden’s methodological contributions may have had a bigger impact on the study of religion than his theoretical contributions.