University ranking: a dialogue on turning towards alternatives

Sarah Amsler
{"title":"University ranking: a dialogue on turning towards alternatives","authors":"Sarah Amsler","doi":"10.3354/ESEP00136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article, written as a critical dialogue between 2 interlocutors, puts forward a \nnumber of arguments justifying and critiquing the practice of university ranking. It draws attention \nto 3 key problematics: the ideological construction of institutional ranking as a professionally \nnecessary and inevitable activity, the symbolically violent character of ranking as a form of social \ncategorization and hierarchization, and the possibility of denying the system legitimacy by practicing \nmore prefigurative forms of its critique. Through the progression of this dialogue, the article \nultimately makes a case for turning away from university rankings on both scientific and ethicopolitical \ngrounds.","PeriodicalId":40001,"journal":{"name":"Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics","volume":"51 1","pages":"155-166"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3354/ESEP00136","citationCount":"25","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3354/ESEP00136","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 25

Abstract

This article, written as a critical dialogue between 2 interlocutors, puts forward a number of arguments justifying and critiquing the practice of university ranking. It draws attention to 3 key problematics: the ideological construction of institutional ranking as a professionally necessary and inevitable activity, the symbolically violent character of ranking as a form of social categorization and hierarchization, and the possibility of denying the system legitimacy by practicing more prefigurative forms of its critique. Through the progression of this dialogue, the article ultimately makes a case for turning away from university rankings on both scientific and ethicopolitical grounds.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大学排名:一场转向其他选择的对话
这篇文章,作为两位对话者之间的批判性对话,提出了一些论证和批评大学排名的做法。它引起了人们对三个关键问题的关注:将制度排名作为一种专业上必要和不可避免的活动的意识形态建构,将排名作为一种社会分类和等级化形式的象征性暴力特征,以及通过实践更多的预示形式来否定制度合法性的可能性。通过这一对话的进展,文章最终从科学和伦理政治的角度提出了放弃大学排名的理由。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics
Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
期刊介绍: •provides a global stage for presenting, discussing and developing issues concerning ethics in science, environmental politics, and ecological and economic ethics •publishes accepted manuscripts rapidly •guarantees immediate world-wide visibility •is edited and produced by an experienced team
期刊最新文献
Justifying the Precautionary Principle as a political principle The Humanised Zoo: Decolonizing conservation education through a new narrative Ecotheology: environmental ethical view in water spring protection The role of 'Thoughtful Intelligence' in climate statesmanship Cognitive artifacts and human enhancement
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1