“Are You Living History?” — The Soviet Person and the Quiet Archival Revolution of Late Socialism

Q3 Social Sciences Antropologicheskij Forum Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.31250/1815-8870-2021-17-50-169-199
Alissa Klots, M. Romashova
{"title":"“Are You Living History?” — The Soviet Person and the Quiet Archival Revolution of Late Socialism","authors":"Alissa Klots, M. Romashova","doi":"10.31250/1815-8870-2021-17-50-169-199","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article focuses on the changes that occurred in archiving practices after Stalin. Based on the analysis of publications in professional journals for archivists and in popular press — as well as the personal archival collection of Perm activist and local historian Valentina Sokolova — we argue that, as a result of the democratic and humanistic turn in Soviet society after Stalin’s death, late socialism saw a shift in the understanding of who is worthy of having their documents preserved in an archive. Whereas previously only “remarkable” individuals had the right for a private archival collection, now some members of the archivist community began a campaign to collect documents of “ordinary” citizens. The archivists found allies not only among specialists but also among elderly members of the Soviet intelligentsia — participants in the building of socialism, who had no prior connection to historical studies. This shift that we call the “quiet archival revolution” became an integral part of the late Soviet commemorative turn. With the help of the archivists — enthusiasts of the “quiet archival revolution,” elderly activist came to realize their own historical significance and the value of their documents, some of which later made it to the state archival depositories.","PeriodicalId":52194,"journal":{"name":"Antropologicheskij Forum","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antropologicheskij Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31250/1815-8870-2021-17-50-169-199","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article focuses on the changes that occurred in archiving practices after Stalin. Based on the analysis of publications in professional journals for archivists and in popular press — as well as the personal archival collection of Perm activist and local historian Valentina Sokolova — we argue that, as a result of the democratic and humanistic turn in Soviet society after Stalin’s death, late socialism saw a shift in the understanding of who is worthy of having their documents preserved in an archive. Whereas previously only “remarkable” individuals had the right for a private archival collection, now some members of the archivist community began a campaign to collect documents of “ordinary” citizens. The archivists found allies not only among specialists but also among elderly members of the Soviet intelligentsia — participants in the building of socialism, who had no prior connection to historical studies. This shift that we call the “quiet archival revolution” became an integral part of the late Soviet commemorative turn. With the help of the archivists — enthusiasts of the “quiet archival revolution,” elderly activist came to realize their own historical significance and the value of their documents, some of which later made it to the state archival depositories.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“你活在历史中吗?”——《苏联人和晚期社会主义的无声档案革命》
这篇文章的重点是斯大林之后在归档实践中发生的变化。基于对档案工作者和大众媒体在专业期刊上发表的出版物的分析,以及Perm活动家和当地历史学家Valentina Sokolova的个人档案收藏,我们认为,由于斯大林死后苏联社会的民主和人文主义转向,晚期社会主义看到了对谁值得将他们的文件保存在档案中的理解的转变。以前只有“杰出的”个人才有权收集私人档案,现在档案保管员社区的一些成员开始了一场收集“普通”公民文件的运动。档案工作者不仅在专家中找到了盟友,而且在苏联知识分子中的老年成员中也找到了盟友——他们是社会主义建设的参与者,之前与历史研究没有任何联系。这种被我们称为“安静的档案革命”的转变成为苏联后期纪念转向的一个组成部分。在热心于“安静的档案革命”的档案保管员的帮助下,年长的活动人士开始意识到他们自己的历史意义和他们的文件的价值,其中一些文件后来进入了国家档案馆。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Antropologicheskij Forum
Antropologicheskij Forum Social Sciences-Cultural Studies
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
期刊最新文献
On Leviathan’s Tail: Anthropological Studies of Bureaucracy and Bureaucrats From Call to Emergency Card: Looking for Discretion of “112” Operators A Review of O. P. Kolomiets, I. I. Krupnik (eds.), Applied Ethnology in Chukotka: Indigenous Knowledge, Museums, Cultural Heritage (Celebrating the 125th Anniversary of Nikolai L. Gondatti’s 1895 Trip to the Chukchi Peninsula). Moscow: PressPass, 2020, 468 pp. Bureaucratic Routes and Documentary Temporalities of a Conscript Questionnaire in a Human Rights Organization Universal Rules and Discretionary Situations: How Do Street-Level Bureaucrats Calculate Suffering
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1