The expression of path in three satellite-framed languages

IF 0.2 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Jezikoslovlje Pub Date : 2019-01-01 DOI:10.29162/jez.2019.2
Joanna Łozińska
{"title":"The expression of path in three satellite-framed languages","authors":"Joanna Łozińska","doi":"10.29162/jez.2019.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cross-linguistic studies of the lexicalization of motion tend to contrast satellite- with verb-framed languages (e.g. Slobin 1996; 2004; Cardini 2008; Özçalışkan & Slobin 2003; Kopecka 2004; Fargard et al. 2013, etc.) and concentrate less frequently on intra-typological analyses (but cf. e.g. Filipović 2007; Hasko 2010; Ibarretxe-Antuñano 2009; Ibarretxe-Antuñano & Hijazo-Gascón 2012). Even fewer studies contrast genetically related languages (but cf. e.g. Łozińska 2018). The main aim of this study was to establish the path-saliency cline of three satellite-framed languages: Polish, Russian, and English. The analysis was based on elicited data. The overall patterns of expressing the path of motion in the three languages were shown to be caused by their belonging to the same typological category. The differences could be attributed, to a large extent, to differences in the morphological structures and in the lexical repertoires of motion-coding expressions available to the speakers of the three languages. However, the analysis of descriptions of three specific spatial situations (i.e. vertical, boundary-crossing, and deictic relations) pointed to other factors that may influence path coding in the three languages. Thus, despite the satellite-verb character of the languages examined and the morpho-syntactic differences between them, all our participants, who were native speakers of the three languages examined, tended to code vertical relations by means of path verbs. The number of tokens of path verbs used to code this particular spatial relation was found to be higher than the number of tokens of path verbs used to code deictic or boundary-crossing motion.","PeriodicalId":41610,"journal":{"name":"Jezikoslovlje","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.29162/jez.2019.2","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jezikoslovlje","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29162/jez.2019.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Cross-linguistic studies of the lexicalization of motion tend to contrast satellite- with verb-framed languages (e.g. Slobin 1996; 2004; Cardini 2008; Özçalışkan & Slobin 2003; Kopecka 2004; Fargard et al. 2013, etc.) and concentrate less frequently on intra-typological analyses (but cf. e.g. Filipović 2007; Hasko 2010; Ibarretxe-Antuñano 2009; Ibarretxe-Antuñano & Hijazo-Gascón 2012). Even fewer studies contrast genetically related languages (but cf. e.g. Łozińska 2018). The main aim of this study was to establish the path-saliency cline of three satellite-framed languages: Polish, Russian, and English. The analysis was based on elicited data. The overall patterns of expressing the path of motion in the three languages were shown to be caused by their belonging to the same typological category. The differences could be attributed, to a large extent, to differences in the morphological structures and in the lexical repertoires of motion-coding expressions available to the speakers of the three languages. However, the analysis of descriptions of three specific spatial situations (i.e. vertical, boundary-crossing, and deictic relations) pointed to other factors that may influence path coding in the three languages. Thus, despite the satellite-verb character of the languages examined and the morpho-syntactic differences between them, all our participants, who were native speakers of the three languages examined, tended to code vertical relations by means of path verbs. The number of tokens of path verbs used to code this particular spatial relation was found to be higher than the number of tokens of path verbs used to code deictic or boundary-crossing motion.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
三种卫星框架语言中路径的表达
跨语言的运动词汇化研究倾向于对比卫星语言和动词框架语言(如Slobin 1996;2004;Cardini 2008;Özçalışkan & Slobin2003;Kopecka 2004;Fargard et al. 2013等),较少关注类型学内部分析(但参见filipoviki 2007;Hasko2010;Ibarretxe-Antunano 2009;Ibarretxe-Antuñano & Hijazo-Gascón 2012)。甚至更少的研究对比基因相关的语言(但参见Łozińska2018)。本研究的主要目的是建立三种卫星框架语言:波兰语、俄语和英语的路径显著性变化。这一分析是以引证的数据为基础的。三种语言表达运动路径的总体模式是由于它们属于同一类型范畴所导致的。这种差异在很大程度上可以归因于三种语言使用者在形态结构和动作编码表达的词法上的差异。然而,对三种具体空间情况(即垂直、跨界和指示关系)的描述的分析指出了可能影响三种语言中路径编码的其他因素。因此,尽管所研究的语言具有卫星动词的特征,并且它们之间存在形态句法上的差异,但所有以这三种语言为母语的参与者都倾向于通过路径动词来编码垂直关系。研究发现,用于编码这种特定空间关系的路径动词的标记数量高于用于编码指示或跨界运动的路径动词的标记数量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Jezikoslovlje
Jezikoslovlje LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3
期刊最新文献
Akuzativne zamjeničke zanaglasnice ju i je u bosanskome, hrvatskome i srpskome Neutralisation in the expression of location and destination of motion in Croatian Upućivanje i prihvaćanje komplimenata na primjeru hrvatskih i njemačkih studenata Usporedba fenomena na dodirnoj točki između sintakse i diskursa Rastavne strukture u hrvatskome crkvenoslavenskom jeziku
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1