The Otherness and the Consumer

IF 0.2 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Jezikoslovlje Pub Date : 2020-12-26 DOI:10.29162/jez.2020.13
Ilhana Škrgić
{"title":"The Otherness\nand the Consumer","authors":"Ilhana Škrgić","doi":"10.29162/jez.2020.13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This\npaper aims to analyze the main paradigms of the horror genre and their\nequivalents in the conservative – liberal political division in the United\nStates by exploring the dominant political rhetoric and its specific framing\ndevices as mirrored in horror cinema. The analysis focuses on two distinct\ncelluloid works by John Carpenter: The\nThing (1982), and They Live\n(1988), themselves constructed as subversive commentaries on the carefully\nintertwined American and global culture of fear and consumerism. The framing\ndevices include the division of citizens based on race and other\ncharacteristics, the “us vs. them” mentality, negation of (inter)national\nunity and coexistence, the symbolism of the color red, as well as repetition\nand hyperbole. As powerful persuasive tools in the hands of the political\nelite, these devices influence the US citizens by appealing to their beliefs.\nThese beliefs are based on models of morality (Lakoff 2002). The dualism of\nhorror is also discussed, i.e. external versus internal horror (the Otherness\noutside and the alien within in Ognjanović 2016), and the way in which the\nbinary quality of the genre informs and guides cinematic artworks in their\nexploration of society, especially one fraught with political and social\nissues. The paper investigates why the two analyzed films are important for a\ndiscussion of contemporary American society and how the horror genre can be\nseen as a prism through which various issues can be explored","PeriodicalId":41610,"journal":{"name":"Jezikoslovlje","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jezikoslovlje","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29162/jez.2020.13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper aims to analyze the main paradigms of the horror genre and their equivalents in the conservative – liberal political division in the United States by exploring the dominant political rhetoric and its specific framing devices as mirrored in horror cinema. The analysis focuses on two distinct celluloid works by John Carpenter: The Thing (1982), and They Live (1988), themselves constructed as subversive commentaries on the carefully intertwined American and global culture of fear and consumerism. The framing devices include the division of citizens based on race and other characteristics, the “us vs. them” mentality, negation of (inter)national unity and coexistence, the symbolism of the color red, as well as repetition and hyperbole. As powerful persuasive tools in the hands of the political elite, these devices influence the US citizens by appealing to their beliefs. These beliefs are based on models of morality (Lakoff 2002). The dualism of horror is also discussed, i.e. external versus internal horror (the Otherness outside and the alien within in Ognjanović 2016), and the way in which the binary quality of the genre informs and guides cinematic artworks in their exploration of society, especially one fraught with political and social issues. The paper investigates why the two analyzed films are important for a discussion of contemporary American society and how the horror genre can be seen as a prism through which various issues can be explored
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
他者与消费者
本文旨在通过探究恐怖电影中所反映的主流政治修辞及其具体的框架装置,分析恐怖类型的主要范式及其在美国保守-自由政治分裂中的对应形式。分析的重点是约翰·卡彭特的两部独特的电影作品:《The thing》(1982)和《They Live》(1988),这两部电影本身就是对美国和全球恐惧与消费主义文化精心交织在一起的颠覆性评论。其框架手段包括基于种族和其他特征的公民划分,“我们对他们”的心态,对(国际)民族团结和共存的否定,红色的象征主义,以及重复和夸张。作为政治精英手中强大的说服工具,这些设备通过吸引美国公民的信仰来影响他们。这些信念是基于道德模式的(Lakoff 2002)。恐怖的二元论也被讨论,即外部与内部的恐怖(ognjanoviki, 2016),以及该类型的二元质量如何告知和指导电影艺术作品探索社会,特别是充满政治和社会问题的电影艺术作品。本文调查了为什么这两部被分析的电影对当代美国社会的讨论是重要的,以及恐怖类型如何被视为一个棱镜,通过它可以探索各种问题
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Jezikoslovlje
Jezikoslovlje LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3
期刊最新文献
Akuzativne zamjeničke zanaglasnice ju i je u bosanskome, hrvatskome i srpskome Neutralisation in the expression of location and destination of motion in Croatian Upućivanje i prihvaćanje komplimenata na primjeru hrvatskih i njemačkih studenata Usporedba fenomena na dodirnoj točki između sintakse i diskursa Rastavne strukture u hrvatskome crkvenoslavenskom jeziku
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1