Faculty Evaluation of Administrators: The Experience of Brooklyn College.

E. A. Brown
{"title":"Faculty Evaluation of Administrators: The Experience of Brooklyn College.","authors":"E. A. Brown","doi":"10.2307/40225145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For a good many years much attention has been given to the evaluation of teachers and scholars, yet, despite growing faculty interest in the question, little has been said about the evaluation of administrators. Over the past three and a half years a faculty committee for the evaluation of administrators has been functioning at Brooklyn College, one of the largest units of the City University of New York. As one of the few such bodies in existence, its operations have attracted interest, but as yet no account of its work has been written. The process of establishing the committee was beset with difficulties; determination of its composition and mandate required long discussion and complex negotiation; definition of its procedures was not easy, and the committee continues to wrestle with the problem of clarifying its goal and methodology and of assessing the impact of its work. An account of the experiences of the committee may prove useful to faculty on other campuses who are seeking to define their own rights and responsibilities with relation to those of the administrators with whom they work.","PeriodicalId":87494,"journal":{"name":"AAUP bulletin : quarterly publication of the American Association of University Professors","volume":"64 1","pages":"298-304"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1978-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/40225145","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AAUP bulletin : quarterly publication of the American Association of University Professors","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/40225145","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

For a good many years much attention has been given to the evaluation of teachers and scholars, yet, despite growing faculty interest in the question, little has been said about the evaluation of administrators. Over the past three and a half years a faculty committee for the evaluation of administrators has been functioning at Brooklyn College, one of the largest units of the City University of New York. As one of the few such bodies in existence, its operations have attracted interest, but as yet no account of its work has been written. The process of establishing the committee was beset with difficulties; determination of its composition and mandate required long discussion and complex negotiation; definition of its procedures was not easy, and the committee continues to wrestle with the problem of clarifying its goal and methodology and of assessing the impact of its work. An account of the experiences of the committee may prove useful to faculty on other campuses who are seeking to define their own rights and responsibilities with relation to those of the administrators with whom they work.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
管理人员的教师评价:布鲁克林学院的经验。
多年来,人们对教师和学者的评价给予了很大的关注,然而,尽管教师们对这个问题的兴趣越来越大,但对管理人员的评价却很少提及。在过去三年半的时间里,纽约城市大学最大的学院之一布鲁克林学院(Brooklyn College)成立了一个教员委员会,负责对管理人员进行评估。作为现存为数不多的这类机构之一,它的运作引起了人们的兴趣,但迄今为止还没有关于它的工作的记载。成立委员会的过程困难重重;确定其组成和任务需要进行长时间的讨论和复杂的谈判;确定其程序并不容易,委员会继续努力解决澄清其目标和方法以及评估其工作影响的问题。对委员会经验的叙述可能会对其他学校的教师有用,因为他们正在努力界定自己与与他们一起工作的管理人员的权利和责任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Preliminary Report on the Bakke Case Faculty Evaluation of Administrators: The Experience of Brooklyn College. Who Is Part-Time in Academe?. Equality for Individuals or Equality for Groups: Implications of the Supreme Court Decision in the Manhart Case The Continuing Academic Crisis in West Germany: Perceptions and Imponderables
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1