C. Beleites, O. Guntinas-Lichius, G. Ernst, J. Popp, C. Krafft
{"title":"FTIR microscopic imaging of carcinoma tissue section with 4× and 15× objectives: Practical considerations","authors":"C. Beleites, O. Guntinas-Lichius, G. Ernst, J. Popp, C. Krafft","doi":"10.3233/BSI-140101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The advent of FTIR microscopic spectrometers with focal plane array detectors enabled rapid image acquisition with diffraction limited lateral resolution. The field of view depends on the magnification and the detector size. FTIR images of large samples can be collected in the so called mosaic mode by stitching individual images together. If the mosaic is composed of hundreds of images, the total acquisition time and the data size will increase considerably. One computational and two optical options are compared to reduce both acquisition time and data size. First, the 2× field expansion optic increases the measured sample area fourfold. Second, using a 4× objective instead of the standard 15× objective increases the area covered by a single image by a factor of 11. Third, pixel binning averages neighboring pixels at the expense of lateral resolution. All options are demonstrated in a case study of a thin section of laryngeal carcinoma encompassing normal tissue, inflammation, connective tissue, dysplasia, carcinoma and blood. Data analysis is described using the toolbox hyperSpec operating under the R environment and complemented by parallel computing functions. A classification model that was trained with low magnification data in the range from 1200 to 1800 cm−1 gave similar results for higher magnification data. Restrictions occurred for microscopic features smaller than the detector pixel size and for biomarkers below 1200 cm−1 due to signal attenuation of the 4× objective lenses. FTIR imaging mosaic strategies of other groups and the emerging use of quantum cascade lasers for IR imaging are discussed.","PeriodicalId":44239,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical Spectroscopy and Imaging","volume":"4 1","pages":"57-66"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3233/BSI-140101","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical Spectroscopy and Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/BSI-140101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SPECTROSCOPY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
The advent of FTIR microscopic spectrometers with focal plane array detectors enabled rapid image acquisition with diffraction limited lateral resolution. The field of view depends on the magnification and the detector size. FTIR images of large samples can be collected in the so called mosaic mode by stitching individual images together. If the mosaic is composed of hundreds of images, the total acquisition time and the data size will increase considerably. One computational and two optical options are compared to reduce both acquisition time and data size. First, the 2× field expansion optic increases the measured sample area fourfold. Second, using a 4× objective instead of the standard 15× objective increases the area covered by a single image by a factor of 11. Third, pixel binning averages neighboring pixels at the expense of lateral resolution. All options are demonstrated in a case study of a thin section of laryngeal carcinoma encompassing normal tissue, inflammation, connective tissue, dysplasia, carcinoma and blood. Data analysis is described using the toolbox hyperSpec operating under the R environment and complemented by parallel computing functions. A classification model that was trained with low magnification data in the range from 1200 to 1800 cm−1 gave similar results for higher magnification data. Restrictions occurred for microscopic features smaller than the detector pixel size and for biomarkers below 1200 cm−1 due to signal attenuation of the 4× objective lenses. FTIR imaging mosaic strategies of other groups and the emerging use of quantum cascade lasers for IR imaging are discussed.
期刊介绍:
Biomedical Spectroscopy and Imaging (BSI) is a multidisciplinary journal devoted to the timely publication of basic and applied research that uses spectroscopic and imaging techniques in different areas of life science including biology, biochemistry, biotechnology, bionanotechnology, environmental science, food science, pharmaceutical science, physiology and medicine. Scientists are encouraged to submit their work for publication in the form of original articles, brief communications, rapid communications, reviews and mini-reviews. Techniques covered include, but are not limited, to the following: • Vibrational Spectroscopy (Infrared, Raman, Teraherz) • Circular Dichroism Spectroscopy • Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (NMR, ESR) • UV-vis Spectroscopy • Mössbauer Spectroscopy • X-ray Spectroscopy (Absorption, Emission, Photoelectron, Fluorescence) • Neutron Spectroscopy • Mass Spectroscopy • Fluorescence Spectroscopy • X-ray and Neutron Scattering • Differential Scanning Calorimetry • Atomic Force Microscopy • Surface Plasmon Resonance • Magnetic Resonance Imaging • X-ray Imaging • Electron Imaging • Neutron Imaging • Raman Imaging • Infrared Imaging • Terahertz Imaging • Fluorescence Imaging • Near-infrared spectroscopy.