Joking, being aggressive and shutting people up: the use of focus groups in LIS research

IF 0.7 Q3 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE EDUCATION FOR INFORMATION Pub Date : 1997-01-01 DOI:10.3233/EFI-1997-15406
A. Goulding
{"title":"Joking, being aggressive and shutting people up: the use of focus groups in LIS research","authors":"A. Goulding","doi":"10.3233/EFI-1997-15406","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While focus groups are a frequently-used research method in other disciplines, they are still something of a novelty in library and information studies, particularly in the UK Scanning the LISA I database (in December 1996) there are only 43 references to focus group and most relate to US studies. Often, focus groups are seen as a way of obtaining views on the research subject prior to the investigation proper. This paper will argue, however, that focus groups have great potential as the principle data-gathering method. This paper will discuss: what focus groups are; why focus groups should be considered an appropriate research tool in library and information services; the advantages of using focus groups; the practicalities of running a focus group session; and the type of data generated in focus groups and methods of analysis. It is concluded that focus groups are a valuable research method which simultaneously gives participants a social space in which they can voice their concerns, while allowing the researcher/moderator to control (to whatever extent) the discussion.","PeriodicalId":51668,"journal":{"name":"EDUCATION FOR INFORMATION","volume":"15 1","pages":"331-341"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"1997-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3233/EFI-1997-15406","citationCount":"25","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EDUCATION FOR INFORMATION","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/EFI-1997-15406","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 25

Abstract

While focus groups are a frequently-used research method in other disciplines, they are still something of a novelty in library and information studies, particularly in the UK Scanning the LISA I database (in December 1996) there are only 43 references to focus group and most relate to US studies. Often, focus groups are seen as a way of obtaining views on the research subject prior to the investigation proper. This paper will argue, however, that focus groups have great potential as the principle data-gathering method. This paper will discuss: what focus groups are; why focus groups should be considered an appropriate research tool in library and information services; the advantages of using focus groups; the practicalities of running a focus group session; and the type of data generated in focus groups and methods of analysis. It is concluded that focus groups are a valuable research method which simultaneously gives participants a social space in which they can voice their concerns, while allowing the researcher/moderator to control (to whatever extent) the discussion.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
开玩笑,咄咄逼人,让人们闭嘴:焦点小组在美国研究中的应用
虽然焦点小组在其他学科中是一种常用的研究方法,但在图书馆和信息研究中,它们仍然是一种新奇的东西,特别是在英国。扫描LISA I数据库(1996年12月),只有43篇关于焦点小组的参考文献,大多数与美国的研究有关。通常,焦点小组被视为在调查之前获得对研究主题意见的一种方式。然而,本文将论证焦点小组作为主要数据收集方法的巨大潜力。本文将讨论:什么是焦点小组;为什么焦点小组应被视为图书馆和信息服务的适当研究工具;使用焦点小组的优势;开展焦点小组会议的可行性;以及焦点小组产生的数据类型和分析方法。结论是焦点小组是一种有价值的研究方法,它同时给参与者一个社会空间,他们可以表达他们的担忧,同时允许研究员/主持人控制(无论在何种程度上)讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
EDUCATION FOR INFORMATION
EDUCATION FOR INFORMATION INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
11.10%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: Information is widely recognized as a vital resource in economic development. The skills of information handling traditionally associated with libraries, are now in great demand in all sectors, including government, business and commerce. The education and training of information professionals is, therefore, an issue of growing significance. Education for Information has been since 1983 a forum for debate and discussion on education and training issues in the sphere of information handling. It includes refereed full-length articles and short communications on matters of current concern to educators and practitioners alike. Its News section reports on significant activities and events in the international arena.
期刊最新文献
Data sharing in academic publications: The case of education journals Information everywhere: Introduction to the special issue of LIDA 2023 (Libraries in the Digital Age) conference: Issue 1 Obituary: Pierre Pluye 1962–2023 Information everywhere: Introduction to the special issue of LIDA 2023 (Libraries in the Digital Age) conference: Issue 2 Digital privacy and data protection knowledge and skills of university students in Croatia: Preliminary findings
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1