Comparison of muscle nutrient composition between wild and cultured sword prawn(Parapenaeopsis hardwickii)

Q4 Environmental Science Journal of Fisheries of China Pub Date : 2013-01-01 DOI:10.3724/SP.J.1231.2013.38359
Yonghai Shi, Genyu Zhang, Yongshi Liu, Genhai Lu, Yinlong Yan, Yongde Xie, Jiabo Xu, Jianzhong Liu
{"title":"Comparison of muscle nutrient composition between wild and cultured sword prawn(Parapenaeopsis hardwickii)","authors":"Yonghai Shi, Genyu Zhang, Yongshi Liu, Genhai Lu, Yinlong Yan, Yongde Xie, Jiabo Xu, Jianzhong Liu","doi":"10.3724/SP.J.1231.2013.38359","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In order to understand the muscle nutrient characteristics of the sword prawn Parapenaeopsis hardwickii,the nutritional composition and quality of muscles from the wild and cultured sword prawn were investigated and analyzed by biochemical analysis methods.The results show that the crude fat content of wild group(0.89%)was significantly lower than that of cultured group(1.12%),while the crude ash content of wild group(1.44%)was significantly higher than that of cultured group(1.31%).No significant difference in moisture and crude protein contents of fresh muscles was found between wild(79.42% and 17.94%,respectively)and cultured group(79.28% and 17.95%,respectively).18 kinds of amino acids were found in muscles from wild and cultured groups,and there was no significant difference in the content of 9 kinds of amino acid between wild and cultured groups,while in other 9 kinds of amino acids,the amino acid content of cultured group was significantly higher than that of wild group.Total amino acid(TAA),total essential amino acid(EAA),total non-essential amino acid(NEAA),total delicious amino acid(DAA),and total shrimp flavor amino acid(SAA)content of cultured group(88.08,30.53,47.39,34.47,and 21.72%,respectively)were significantly higher than those of wild group(83.42,29.69,43.59,32.54,and 21.11%,respectively).The essential amino acid index(EAAI)and the ratio of branched chain amino acid to aromatic amino acid(F value)of cultured group(69.10 and 2.12,respectively)were significantly higher than those of wild group(66.41 and 2.07,respectively).The saturated fatty acids(∑SFA)and poly-unsaturated fatty acids(∑PUFA)relative content of cultured group(39.60% and 36.64%,respectively)were significantly lower than those of wild group(41.95% and 39.51%,respectively),while the mono-unsaturated fatty acids(∑MUFA)relative content of cultured group(23.76%)were significantly higher than that of wild group(18.54%).The EPA+DHA relative content of wild group(28.23%)was significantly higher than that of cultured group(25.66%),while no significant difference was observed in the EPA+DHA absolute content of muscle between wild and cultured groups.Therefore,the sword prawn is nutritional,delicious,and artificial culture did not cause abundant accumulation of fat in muscle;on the contrary,it improved protein nutritive value of the muscle.","PeriodicalId":15710,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Fisheries of China","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Fisheries of China","FirstCategoryId":"1091","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1231.2013.38359","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

In order to understand the muscle nutrient characteristics of the sword prawn Parapenaeopsis hardwickii,the nutritional composition and quality of muscles from the wild and cultured sword prawn were investigated and analyzed by biochemical analysis methods.The results show that the crude fat content of wild group(0.89%)was significantly lower than that of cultured group(1.12%),while the crude ash content of wild group(1.44%)was significantly higher than that of cultured group(1.31%).No significant difference in moisture and crude protein contents of fresh muscles was found between wild(79.42% and 17.94%,respectively)and cultured group(79.28% and 17.95%,respectively).18 kinds of amino acids were found in muscles from wild and cultured groups,and there was no significant difference in the content of 9 kinds of amino acid between wild and cultured groups,while in other 9 kinds of amino acids,the amino acid content of cultured group was significantly higher than that of wild group.Total amino acid(TAA),total essential amino acid(EAA),total non-essential amino acid(NEAA),total delicious amino acid(DAA),and total shrimp flavor amino acid(SAA)content of cultured group(88.08,30.53,47.39,34.47,and 21.72%,respectively)were significantly higher than those of wild group(83.42,29.69,43.59,32.54,and 21.11%,respectively).The essential amino acid index(EAAI)and the ratio of branched chain amino acid to aromatic amino acid(F value)of cultured group(69.10 and 2.12,respectively)were significantly higher than those of wild group(66.41 and 2.07,respectively).The saturated fatty acids(∑SFA)and poly-unsaturated fatty acids(∑PUFA)relative content of cultured group(39.60% and 36.64%,respectively)were significantly lower than those of wild group(41.95% and 39.51%,respectively),while the mono-unsaturated fatty acids(∑MUFA)relative content of cultured group(23.76%)were significantly higher than that of wild group(18.54%).The EPA+DHA relative content of wild group(28.23%)was significantly higher than that of cultured group(25.66%),while no significant difference was observed in the EPA+DHA absolute content of muscle between wild and cultured groups.Therefore,the sword prawn is nutritional,delicious,and artificial culture did not cause abundant accumulation of fat in muscle;on the contrary,it improved protein nutritive value of the muscle.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
野生与养殖对虾肌肉营养成分的比较
为了解硬威副虾(Parapenaeopsis hardwickii)剑对虾肌肉营养特性,采用生化分析方法对野生和养殖剑对虾肌肉的营养成分和品质进行了研究和分析。结果表明:野生组粗脂肪含量(0.89%)显著低于养殖组(1.12%),粗灰分含量(1.44%)显著高于养殖组(1.31%)。野生组(分别为79.42%和17.94%)和培养组(分别为79.28%和17.95%)鲜肌肉的水分和粗蛋白质含量差异不显著。在野生组和养殖组肌肉中发现了18种氨基酸,其中9种氨基酸的含量在野生组和养殖组之间无显著差异,而在其他9种氨基酸中,养殖组的氨基酸含量显著高于野生组。养殖组总氨基酸(TAA)、总必需氨基酸(EAA)、总非必需氨基酸(NEAA)、总鲜味氨基酸(DAA)和总鲜味氨基酸(SAA)含量分别为88.08、30.53、47.39、34.47和21.72%,显著高于野生组(83.42、29.69、43.59、32.54和21.11%)。培养组必需氨基酸指数(EAAI)和支链氨基酸/芳香氨基酸比值(F值)分别为69.10和2.12,显著高于野生组(66.41和2.07)。培养组的饱和脂肪酸(∑SFA)和多不饱和脂肪酸(∑PUFA)相对含量(分别为39.60%和36.64%)显著低于野生组(分别为41.95%和39.51%),而单不饱和脂肪酸(∑MUFA)相对含量(23.76%)显著高于野生组(18.54%)。野生组EPA+DHA的相对含量(28.23%)显著高于养殖组(25.66%),而野生组和养殖组之间EPA+DHA的绝对含量差异不显著。因此,剑虾营养丰富,味道鲜美,人工养殖没有造成肌肉中脂肪的大量积累,反而提高了肌肉的蛋白质营养价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Fisheries of China
Journal of Fisheries of China Environmental Science-Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5213
期刊介绍: "Fisheries of" mainly reflects the results of scientific research and development of the direction of aquaculture for domestic and foreign academic exchanges Fisheries Service. Mainly basic research published in Fisheries, aquaculture and proliferation of fishing waters environmental protection, preservation of aquatic products processing and utilization, fishing equipment, and other aspects of mechanical papers, research briefings and reviewed.
期刊最新文献
Effects of cryopreservation on enzyme activity of Exopalaemon carinicauda spermatozoa Community structure of zooplankton and its relation to environmental factors in the silver-carp-and-bighead-carp-dominated Qiandao Lake Using carbon stable isotope ratio(δ~(13)C)to evaluate contribution of artificial feeds to growth of pond cultured juvenile sea cucumber Apostichopus japonicus(Selenka) Estimates for the heritability of growth of Mytilus edulis Microsatellite analysis of population genetic diversity in Triplophysa xiangxiensis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1