Analysis of scientific-methodical approaches to assessing the impact of hostilities on land productivity from scientific-methodical approaches to assessing the impact of hostilities on land productivity

Y. Butenko, R. Kharytonenko, S. Petrychenko
{"title":"Analysis of scientific-methodical approaches to assessing the impact of hostilities on land productivity from scientific-methodical approaches to assessing the impact of hostilities on land productivity","authors":"Y. Butenko, R. Kharytonenko, S. Petrychenko","doi":"10.31548/zemleustriy2023.01.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A review and analysis of government methodological recommendations, studies of scientific institutions, groups of scientists and public organizations related to studies of the assessment and impact of hostilities on the ground was carried out. The key positions in methodological recommendations related to the assessment of negative consequences on land due to man-made pollution and damage are selected and indicated. The key positions in the methodological recommendations related to the assessment of negative consequences on the ground as a result of hostilities were analyzed and indicated. The study of scientific institutions, groups of scientists and public organizations related to studies of the assessment and impact of hostilities on lands and soils is considered. It is indicated that the practical studies to date, which are related to the assessment of the impact of hostilities on the productivity of land use, in particular, in terms of the territories of territorial communities, are spot-on. It is noted that the government's methodological recommendations, dedicated to land in general or in the context of agricultural land, forest fund and do not take into account other categories of land. The need to continue scientific research and the development of methodological recommendations regarding the assessment and restoration of land as a result of hostilities was emphasized, and relevant directions were proposed.","PeriodicalId":56214,"journal":{"name":"Zemleustrij Kadastr i Monitoring Zemel''","volume":"105 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zemleustrij Kadastr i Monitoring Zemel''","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31548/zemleustriy2023.01.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A review and analysis of government methodological recommendations, studies of scientific institutions, groups of scientists and public organizations related to studies of the assessment and impact of hostilities on the ground was carried out. The key positions in methodological recommendations related to the assessment of negative consequences on land due to man-made pollution and damage are selected and indicated. The key positions in the methodological recommendations related to the assessment of negative consequences on the ground as a result of hostilities were analyzed and indicated. The study of scientific institutions, groups of scientists and public organizations related to studies of the assessment and impact of hostilities on lands and soils is considered. It is indicated that the practical studies to date, which are related to the assessment of the impact of hostilities on the productivity of land use, in particular, in terms of the territories of territorial communities, are spot-on. It is noted that the government's methodological recommendations, dedicated to land in general or in the context of agricultural land, forest fund and do not take into account other categories of land. The need to continue scientific research and the development of methodological recommendations regarding the assessment and restoration of land as a result of hostilities was emphasized, and relevant directions were proposed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从评估敌对行动对土地生产力的影响的科学方法方法分析敌对行动对土地生产力的影响
对政府的方法建议、科学机构、科学家团体和公共组织有关实地敌对行动的评估和影响的研究进行了审查和分析。在有关评估人为污染和破坏对土地造成的负面影响的方法学建议中,选择并指出了关键立场。对方法建议中有关评估敌对行动在实地造成的消极后果的关键立场进行了分析和说明。审议了与评估敌对行动对土地和土壤的影响的研究有关的科学机构、科学家团体和公共组织的研究。报告指出,迄今有关评估敌对行动对土地使用生产力的影响的实际研究,特别是就领土社区的领土而言,是非常准确的。人们注意到,政府的方法建议专门针对一般土地或农业用地、森林基金,而没有考虑到其他类别的土地。有人强调必须继续进行科学研究,并就评估和恢复敌对行动造成的土地拟订方法建议,并提出了有关的方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Current state and prospects of land circulation in Ukraine To the issue of development of workingland management projects to improve unproductive lands Analysis of scientific-methodical approaches to assessing the impact of hostilities on land productivity from scientific-methodical approaches to assessing the impact of hostilities on land productivity Receipt of rental payment for the use of natural budgets in the local budget in the context of modernizing the economic mechanism of natural use Study of changes in land cover categories in Ukraine based on remote sensing data
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1