Katarzyna Perz-Juszczyszyn, M. Feltzke, Katarzyna Dubas, W. C. Maples, B. Kolodziejczak, H. Buczkowska
{"title":"Comparison of near horizontal heterophoria tests in free space and with phoropter","authors":"Katarzyna Perz-Juszczyszyn, M. Feltzke, Katarzyna Dubas, W. C. Maples, B. Kolodziejczak, H. Buczkowska","doi":"10.37190/oa210204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Measurements of phoria at near are important elements of the optometric assessment of binocular vision. It is important to know if different methods of measuring a phoria are interchangeable. This study was designed to compare phoria measures using in-phoropter (von Graefe) and in free space methods (Howell card). Methods: The study was conducted with 70 pre-presbyopic subjects, aged 23–35 years. Both near the von Graefe and near Howell card horizontal dissociated phorias along and with gradient +1.00 D and –1.00 D phorias were measured for each technique. Results: The mean values of the near dissociated phoria, for both test conditions (von Graefe and Howell card) showed a slight deviation in the two measures with von Graefe measures being generally more exophoric. The mean value of the phoropter phoria was 1.97 ∆ base-in and in free space, the value was 0.9 ∆ base-in. The phoropter phoria with the +1.00 D gradient was 5.24 ∆ base-in, and in free space, 2.73 ∆ base-in. Measurements of the phorometric phoria with a gradient of –1.00 D gave a mean of 0.42 ∆ base-out and 0.94 ∆ base-out in free space. The near phoria measures were significantly different for the basic near measure (p = 0.01) and for the +1.00 D gradient (p = 0.000002) but not for the –1.00 D measure (p = 0.36). Conclusion: The results of the differences in the near horizontal phoria in free space and in- phoropter were significantly different for the basic measure and for the +1.00 D gradient. The findings between the two methods of testing should therefore not be treated as equivalent or convertible. Each test method should have separate means and ranges established.","PeriodicalId":19589,"journal":{"name":"Optica Applicata","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Optica Applicata","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37190/oa210204","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OPTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Measurements of phoria at near are important elements of the optometric assessment of binocular vision. It is important to know if different methods of measuring a phoria are interchangeable. This study was designed to compare phoria measures using in-phoropter (von Graefe) and in free space methods (Howell card). Methods: The study was conducted with 70 pre-presbyopic subjects, aged 23–35 years. Both near the von Graefe and near Howell card horizontal dissociated phorias along and with gradient +1.00 D and –1.00 D phorias were measured for each technique. Results: The mean values of the near dissociated phoria, for both test conditions (von Graefe and Howell card) showed a slight deviation in the two measures with von Graefe measures being generally more exophoric. The mean value of the phoropter phoria was 1.97 ∆ base-in and in free space, the value was 0.9 ∆ base-in. The phoropter phoria with the +1.00 D gradient was 5.24 ∆ base-in, and in free space, 2.73 ∆ base-in. Measurements of the phorometric phoria with a gradient of –1.00 D gave a mean of 0.42 ∆ base-out and 0.94 ∆ base-out in free space. The near phoria measures were significantly different for the basic near measure (p = 0.01) and for the +1.00 D gradient (p = 0.000002) but not for the –1.00 D measure (p = 0.36). Conclusion: The results of the differences in the near horizontal phoria in free space and in- phoropter were significantly different for the basic measure and for the +1.00 D gradient. The findings between the two methods of testing should therefore not be treated as equivalent or convertible. Each test method should have separate means and ranges established.
期刊介绍:
Acoustooptics, atmospheric and ocean optics, atomic and molecular optics, coherence and statistical optics, biooptics, colorimetry, diffraction and gratings, ellipsometry and polarimetry, fiber optics and optical communication, Fourier optics, holography, integrated optics, lasers and their applications, light detectors, light and electron beams, light sources, liquid crystals, medical optics, metamaterials, microoptics, nonlinear optics, optical and electron microscopy, optical computing, optical design and fabrication, optical imaging, optical instrumentation, optical materials, optical measurements, optical modulation, optical properties of solids and thin films, optical sensing, optical systems and their elements, optical trapping, optometry, photoelasticity, photonic crystals, photonic crystal fibers, photonic devices, physical optics, quantum optics, slow and fast light, spectroscopy, storage and processing of optical information, ultrafast optics.