Percurso para o Senado: carreiras e social background dos senadores das 51ª e 52ª Legislaturas

IF 4.1 2区社会学 Q1 POLITICAL SCIENCE Politics & Society Pub Date : 2020-11-19 DOI:10.5007/175-7984.2020v19n45p246

Alison Ribeiro Centeno

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Analyzing the Brazilian Federal Senate between 1999 and 2006 the main objective is to presentthe characteristics of recruitment of the Senators who had a seat in the Upper House accordingto parties’ position in the political spectrum. Exploring a database consisting of information suchas academic degree, profession before the political career and positions previously held by the135 politicians with mandates during the interim, the Federal Senate was composed mainly ofpoliticians with bachelor’s degrees, who were reasonably distinct in their previous professionsand with a strong contrast in the formation of their political careers – high level of experience forcenter and right parties’ politicians and less experience of Senators from the left.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

参议院之路：第51届和第52届立法机构参议员的职业和社会背景

分析1999年至2006年间巴西联邦参议院的主要目标是根据政党在政治光谱中的地位，提出在上院拥有席位的参议员的招聘特点。通过对由135名在过渡时期获得授权的政治家的学历、政治生涯之前的职业和职位等信息组成的数据库进行研究，联邦参议院主要由拥有学士学位的政治家组成。他们在之前的职业生涯中相当独特，在政治生涯的形成过程中形成了强烈的对比——中间和右翼政党的政治家经验丰富，而左翼参议员的经验较少。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

Politics & Society Multiple-

CiteScore

5.00

自引率

4.20%

发文量

期刊介绍： Politics & Society is a peer-reviewed journal. All submitted papers are read by a rotating editorial board member. If a paper is deemed potentially publishable, it is sent to another board member, who, if agreeing that it is potentially publishable, sends it to a third board member. If and only if all three agree, the paper is sent to the entire editorial board for consideration at board meetings. The editorial board meets three times a year, and the board members who are present (usually between 9 and 14) make decisions through a deliberative process that also considers written reports from absent members. Unlike many journals which rely on 1–3 individual blind referee reports and a single editor with final say, the peers who decide whether to accept submitted work are thus the full editorial board of the journal, comprised of scholars from various disciplines, who discuss papers openly, with author names known, at meetings. Editors are required to disclose potential conflicts of interest when evaluating manuscripts and to recuse themselves from voting if such a potential exists.

期刊最新文献

Bringing Household Finance Back In: House Prices and the Missing Macroeconomics of Comparative Political Economy Who Pays for Environmental Policy? Business Power and the Design of State-Level Climate Policies* Supervising Local Cadres in China: The Quest for Authoritarian Accountability Rethinking Antitrust for the Cloud Era Antitrust and Equal Liberty