L’elevage pastral face aux politiques colonials, Post colonials et de regionalization dans l’ espace cedeao.

Y. Sanon
{"title":"L’elevage pastral face aux politiques colonials, Post colonials et de regionalization dans l’ espace cedeao.","authors":"Y. Sanon","doi":"10.4314/BAHPA.V58I3.64219","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"L’elevage et l’agriculture sont les deux principales activites humaines de l’espace de la Communautes Economique des Etats d’Afrique de l’Ouest (CEDEAO). Mais, la disparite des ressources pastorales entre pays saheliens et cotiers accentue les mouvements de betail a l’interieur de la CEDEAO et occasionne souvent des conflits socioeconomiques entre les pasteurs transhumants et les populations des pays d’accueil. La presente etude vise a (i) contribuer a une meilleure apprehension de la transhumance transnationale en Afrique de l’Ouest, (ii) mettre en perspective cette forme de pratique d’elevage en relation avec la libre circulation des personnes et des biens dans l’espace CEDEAO et (iii) identifier des mesures d’integration de la transhumance transnationale dans cet espace. Elle est basee sur une revue critique des politiques coloniales et post-coloniales en matiere d’elevage. Ceci est complete par une etude de cas dans un echantillon de trois pays dont le Burkina Faso, representant les pays de depart d’une part et d’autre part le Ghana et Togo comme pays d’accueil des transhumants. Les resultats revelent que les politiques coloniales francaise et anglaise, puis post-coloniales, essentiellement basees sur les transformations technico-economiques, n’ont pas totalement reussi a sedentariser l’elevage transhumant. Les mouvements des animaux des pays de depart (Burkina Faso) vers les pays d’accueil (Togo et Ghana) ne sont plus en realite des transhumances Mots cles : Transhumance, politiques publiques, politique d’elevage, CEDEAO Livestock production and agriculture are the two main human activities in the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) region. But the disparity in pastoral resources between sahelian and coastal countries accentuates livestock movements within the ECOWAS region and often causes socioeconomic conflicts between transhumance pastoralists and people of the receiving countries. The present study aims at (i) contributing to a better understanding of cross border transhumance in West Africa, (ii) putting an emphasis on that form of livestock production in relation with the free movement of people and goods in ECOWAS region and (iii) identifying transnational transhumance integration measures in the ECOWAS region. This study is based on a critical review of colonial and post colonial policies in terms of livestock production. This is completed by a case study in a sampling of three countries of which Burkina Faso, representing departure countries on one hand and on the other hand Ghana and Togo as receiving countries for pastoralists. The results reveal that French and English colonial, then post-colonial policies, essentially based on technico-economic development, did not completely succeed in keeping to one place the pastoral livestock breeding. Livestock movements from departure countries (Burkina Faso) toward receiving countries (Togo and Ghana) are no more in reality a seasonal transhumance, but a migrationevasion. The social acceptance of pastoralists in the receiving zones seems to be the consequence of a social anthropological and local politics factors than a technico-economic development. Therefore there is a need to amend livestock production and public policies such as land-use policies in order to harmonize them at the level of ECOWAS region. ECOWAS should further involve itself in the definition of regional public policies and promote the convergence of national policies in terms of livestock production and management of natural resources. Key words: Transhumance, public policies, livestock production policy, ECOWAS.","PeriodicalId":75643,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of animal health and production in Africa. Bulletin des sante et production animales en Afrique","volume":"58 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of animal health and production in Africa. Bulletin des sante et production animales en Afrique","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/BAHPA.V58I3.64219","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

L’elevage et l’agriculture sont les deux principales activites humaines de l’espace de la Communautes Economique des Etats d’Afrique de l’Ouest (CEDEAO). Mais, la disparite des ressources pastorales entre pays saheliens et cotiers accentue les mouvements de betail a l’interieur de la CEDEAO et occasionne souvent des conflits socioeconomiques entre les pasteurs transhumants et les populations des pays d’accueil. La presente etude vise a (i) contribuer a une meilleure apprehension de la transhumance transnationale en Afrique de l’Ouest, (ii) mettre en perspective cette forme de pratique d’elevage en relation avec la libre circulation des personnes et des biens dans l’espace CEDEAO et (iii) identifier des mesures d’integration de la transhumance transnationale dans cet espace. Elle est basee sur une revue critique des politiques coloniales et post-coloniales en matiere d’elevage. Ceci est complete par une etude de cas dans un echantillon de trois pays dont le Burkina Faso, representant les pays de depart d’une part et d’autre part le Ghana et Togo comme pays d’accueil des transhumants. Les resultats revelent que les politiques coloniales francaise et anglaise, puis post-coloniales, essentiellement basees sur les transformations technico-economiques, n’ont pas totalement reussi a sedentariser l’elevage transhumant. Les mouvements des animaux des pays de depart (Burkina Faso) vers les pays d’accueil (Togo et Ghana) ne sont plus en realite des transhumances Mots cles : Transhumance, politiques publiques, politique d’elevage, CEDEAO Livestock production and agriculture are the two main human activities in the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) region. But the disparity in pastoral resources between sahelian and coastal countries accentuates livestock movements within the ECOWAS region and often causes socioeconomic conflicts between transhumance pastoralists and people of the receiving countries. The present study aims at (i) contributing to a better understanding of cross border transhumance in West Africa, (ii) putting an emphasis on that form of livestock production in relation with the free movement of people and goods in ECOWAS region and (iii) identifying transnational transhumance integration measures in the ECOWAS region. This study is based on a critical review of colonial and post colonial policies in terms of livestock production. This is completed by a case study in a sampling of three countries of which Burkina Faso, representing departure countries on one hand and on the other hand Ghana and Togo as receiving countries for pastoralists. The results reveal that French and English colonial, then post-colonial policies, essentially based on technico-economic development, did not completely succeed in keeping to one place the pastoral livestock breeding. Livestock movements from departure countries (Burkina Faso) toward receiving countries (Togo and Ghana) are no more in reality a seasonal transhumance, but a migrationevasion. The social acceptance of pastoralists in the receiving zones seems to be the consequence of a social anthropological and local politics factors than a technico-economic development. Therefore there is a need to amend livestock production and public policies such as land-use policies in order to harmonize them at the level of ECOWAS region. ECOWAS should further involve itself in the definition of regional public policies and promote the convergence of national policies in terms of livestock production and management of natural resources. Key words: Transhumance, public policies, livestock production policy, ECOWAS.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
西非经共体地区的殖民、后殖民和区域化政策。
畜牧业和农业是西非国家经济共同体(ecowas)的两项主要人类活动。但是,萨赫勒和沿海国家之间牧区资源的差异加剧了西非经共体内部牲畜的流动,并经常导致迁移牧民和东道国人口之间的社会经济冲突。该一览表a (i),目的是促进更好的跨国进山,另外在西非,(ii)以这种形式的实践观点的复合式与西非经共体地区对人员和货物的自由流动和(三)识别一体化措施的跨国进山,在那个空间。它是基于对殖民和后殖民畜牧业政策的批判性回顾。此外,还对三个国家进行了个案研究,其中布基纳法索是原籍国,加纳和多哥是移徙者的东道国。研究结果表明,法国和英国的殖民政策,以及后来的后殖民政策,主要基于技术经济转型,并没有完全成功地使迁移的牲畜定居下来。动物移动的起点的国家(布基纳法索)向东道国(加纳和多哥)不再作为饲料的现实。关键字:超政治、公共政策、畜牧业和农业生产能力的复合式、西非经共体are the two手“the Economic Community of human活动(西非(West African States)地区。但是萨赫勒地区和沿海国家之间畜牧资源的差距加剧了西非经共体区域内的畜牧流动,并经常造成迁移牧民与接收国人民之间的社会经济冲突。礼物i study at (aims)的谅解contributing to a better of cross border进山in West Africa)(二)谈话,year in on that form of数十年来对牲畜生产关系alone with The movement of people and in西非地区的货物和(iii)中识别进山跨国整合措施对西非地区。本研究是基于对牲畜生产方面的殖民和后殖民政策的批判性回顾。对三个国家进行的个案研究完成了这一工作,其中布基纳法索一方面代表离开国,另一方面加纳和多哥是牧民的东道国。结果表明,法国和英国的殖民,然后是后殖民政策,主要以技术经济发展为基础,并没有完全成功地将畜牧饲养统一起来。从离境国(布基纳法索)到接收国(多哥和加纳)的牲畜流动实际上不再是一种季节性迁移,而是一种迁移逃避。接收地区对牧民的社会接受似乎是社会人类学和地方政治因素的结果,而不是技术经济发展的结果。因此,有必要修改畜牧生产和公共政策,例如土地利用政策,以便在西非经共体区域一级协调这些政策。西非经共体本身应进一步参与确定区域公共政策,并促进有关牲畜生产和自然资源管理的国家政策的统一。关键词:公共政策,畜牧生产政策,西非经共体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Blood Biochemical of Nile Crocodile (Crocodylus niloticus) in Kano Zoological Garden, Nigeria Mapping the distribution of tsetse and animal trypanosomosis in selected districts of Uganda to facilitate targeting control measures Prevalence and pathology of indigestable foreign bodies in rumen and reticulum of cattle slaughtered at Kombolcha Elfora Abattoir, north east Ethiopia Bovine cysticercosis and human teniasis with public health implication at Asella town, Arsi Zone of Oromia Regional State, Ethiopia Detection of pencillin residue in cow milk at Kombolcha dairy farms, Northeastern Ethiopia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1