Mapping the distribution of tsetse and animal trypanosomosis in selected districts of Uganda to facilitate targeting control measures

J. W. Magona, J. Walubengo, F. Kabi, J. T. Odimim, M. Ocaido
{"title":"Mapping the distribution of tsetse and animal trypanosomosis in selected districts of Uganda to facilitate targeting control measures","authors":"J. W. Magona, J. Walubengo, F. Kabi, J. T. Odimim, M. Ocaido","doi":"10.4314/BAHPA.V65I3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Declining Government resources and donor aid for tsetse and trypanosomosis control have compelled countries to delegate control activities to farm-level veterinary extension personnel. While effective control measures such as chemotherapy, tsetse-trapping and restricted insecticide-treatment of livestock exist, implementation of such measures en masse has become increasingly impractical. Therefore mapping the distribution of tsetse and trypanosomosis hotspots was undertaken to ease targeting control measures by district administrative units in Amuria, Dokolo and Kaberamaido districts of Uganda. The districts were divided into grid sites using the program Arcview GIS 3.2. Villages representing the grid sites were physically identified through ground-truthing. Parasitological and tsetse surveys were then conducted in each village to establish the prevalence of trypanosomosis in cattle and apparent tsetse density. A total of 2430, 1304 and 1392 cattle were tested in Amuria, Dokolo and Kaberamaido districts, of which 230 (9.5%), 144 (11.0%) and 106 (7.6%) were detected positive, respectively. At village level, the prevalence of trypanosomosis ranged from 1-24%, 1-28% and 2-18% in Amuria, Dokolo and Kaberamaido districts, respectively. Tsetse surveys conducted concurrently in the respective villages revealed apparent tsetse densities ranging from 0.0-2.4, 0.6-13.2 and 0.6-9.0 flies/trap/day (F/T/D) in Amuria, Dokolo and Kaberamaido districts, respectively. Glossina fuscipes fuscipes was the sole tsetse species caught. Matching apparent tsetse densities at village level with their corresponding prevalences of trypanosomosis revealed that Amuria district had low tsetse densities with high corresponding prevalences of trypanosomosis, suggesting that cattle were encountering a high proportion of infected tsetse. In contrast, Dokolo district had high tsetse densities with low to medium corresponding prevalences of trypanosomosis, suggesting cattle were encountering a low proportion of infected tsetse. Kaberamaido district had low tsetse densities with corresponding low to medium prevalences of trypanosomosis, suggesting that cattle were equally encountering a low proportion of infected tsetse. Mapping to highlight hotspots was anticipated to facilitate planning and prioritization of resources for targeting tsetse and trypanosomosis control by district departments of veterinary services.Keywords: Animal trypanosomosis; Control; mapping; prioritization of resources; Tsetse flies; Uganda","PeriodicalId":75643,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of animal health and production in Africa. Bulletin des sante et production animales en Afrique","volume":"65 1","pages":"459-469"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of animal health and production in Africa. Bulletin des sante et production animales en Afrique","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/BAHPA.V65I3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Declining Government resources and donor aid for tsetse and trypanosomosis control have compelled countries to delegate control activities to farm-level veterinary extension personnel. While effective control measures such as chemotherapy, tsetse-trapping and restricted insecticide-treatment of livestock exist, implementation of such measures en masse has become increasingly impractical. Therefore mapping the distribution of tsetse and trypanosomosis hotspots was undertaken to ease targeting control measures by district administrative units in Amuria, Dokolo and Kaberamaido districts of Uganda. The districts were divided into grid sites using the program Arcview GIS 3.2. Villages representing the grid sites were physically identified through ground-truthing. Parasitological and tsetse surveys were then conducted in each village to establish the prevalence of trypanosomosis in cattle and apparent tsetse density. A total of 2430, 1304 and 1392 cattle were tested in Amuria, Dokolo and Kaberamaido districts, of which 230 (9.5%), 144 (11.0%) and 106 (7.6%) were detected positive, respectively. At village level, the prevalence of trypanosomosis ranged from 1-24%, 1-28% and 2-18% in Amuria, Dokolo and Kaberamaido districts, respectively. Tsetse surveys conducted concurrently in the respective villages revealed apparent tsetse densities ranging from 0.0-2.4, 0.6-13.2 and 0.6-9.0 flies/trap/day (F/T/D) in Amuria, Dokolo and Kaberamaido districts, respectively. Glossina fuscipes fuscipes was the sole tsetse species caught. Matching apparent tsetse densities at village level with their corresponding prevalences of trypanosomosis revealed that Amuria district had low tsetse densities with high corresponding prevalences of trypanosomosis, suggesting that cattle were encountering a high proportion of infected tsetse. In contrast, Dokolo district had high tsetse densities with low to medium corresponding prevalences of trypanosomosis, suggesting cattle were encountering a low proportion of infected tsetse. Kaberamaido district had low tsetse densities with corresponding low to medium prevalences of trypanosomosis, suggesting that cattle were equally encountering a low proportion of infected tsetse. Mapping to highlight hotspots was anticipated to facilitate planning and prioritization of resources for targeting tsetse and trypanosomosis control by district departments of veterinary services.Keywords: Animal trypanosomosis; Control; mapping; prioritization of resources; Tsetse flies; Uganda
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
绘制乌干达选定地区采采蝇和动物锥虫病的分布图,以便采取有针对性的控制措施
用于控制采采蝇和锥虫病的政府资源和捐助者援助不断减少,迫使各国将控制活动委托给农场一级的兽医推广人员。虽然存在诸如化疗、采采陷阱和牲畜限制杀虫剂处理等有效控制措施,但大规模实施这些措施已变得越来越不切实际。因此,绘制了采采蝇和锥虫病热点分布图,以便于乌干达阿穆里亚、多科洛和卡贝拉迈多地区行政单位采取有针对性的控制措施。使用Arcview GIS 3.2软件将地区划分为网格站点。代表网格站点的村庄是通过地面真相进行物理识别的。然后在每个村庄进行了寄生虫学和采采蝇调查,以确定牛中锥虫病的流行程度和表观采采蝇密度。在Amuria、Dokolo和Kaberamaido区共检测了2430头、1304头和1392头牛,其中分别检测出230头(9.5%)、144头(11.0%)和106头(7.6%)呈阳性。在村一级,阿穆里亚、多科洛和卡贝拉迈多县的锥虫病患病率分别为1-24%、1-28%和2-18%。同时进行的采采蝇调查显示,Amuria、Dokolo和Kaberamaido县的采采蝇表观密度分别为0.0-2.4、0.6-13.2和0.6-9.0只/笼/天(F/T/D)。舌蝇(Glossina fuscipes fuscipes)是捕获的唯一采采种。将村一级的表观采采蝇密度与其相应的锥虫病患病率进行比对显示,Amuria区采采蝇密度低,相应的锥虫病患病率高,表明牛遇到的受感染采采蝇比例高。相比之下,Dokolo区采采蝇密度高,相应的锥虫病患病率低至中等,表明牛遇到的受感染采采蝇比例低。Kaberamaido地区采采蝇密度低,相应的锥虫病患病率为中低水平,这表明牛同样遭遇了低比例的受感染采采蝇。预计绘制突出热点的地图将有助于规划和确定资源的优先次序,以便由地区兽医服务部门控制采采蝇和锥虫病。关键词:动物锥虫病;控制;映射;资源的优先次序;采采蝇;乌干达
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Blood Biochemical of Nile Crocodile (Crocodylus niloticus) in Kano Zoological Garden, Nigeria Mapping the distribution of tsetse and animal trypanosomosis in selected districts of Uganda to facilitate targeting control measures Prevalence and pathology of indigestable foreign bodies in rumen and reticulum of cattle slaughtered at Kombolcha Elfora Abattoir, north east Ethiopia Bovine cysticercosis and human teniasis with public health implication at Asella town, Arsi Zone of Oromia Regional State, Ethiopia Detection of pencillin residue in cow milk at Kombolcha dairy farms, Northeastern Ethiopia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1