A Spatial Logic for Simplicial Models

IF 0.6 4区 数学 Q4 COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS Logical Methods in Computer Science Pub Date : 2021-05-18 DOI:10.46298/lmcs-19(3:8)2023
M. Loreti, M. Quadrini
{"title":"A Spatial Logic for Simplicial Models","authors":"M. Loreti, M. Quadrini","doi":"10.46298/lmcs-19(3:8)2023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Collective Adaptive Systems often consist of many heterogeneous components\ntypically organised in groups. These entities interact with each other by\nadapting their behaviour to pursue individual or collective goals. In these\nsystems, the distribution of these entities determines a space that can be\neither physical or logical. The former is defined in terms of a physical\nrelation among components. The latter depends on logical relations, such as\nbeing part of the same group. In this context, specification and verification\nof spatial properties play a fundamental role in supporting the design of\nsystems and predicting their behaviour. For this reason, different tools and\ntechniques have been proposed to specify and verify the properties of space,\nmainly described as graphs. Therefore, the approaches generally use model\nspatial relations to describe a form of proximity among pairs of entities.\nUnfortunately, these graph-based models do not permit considering relations\namong more than two entities that may arise when one is interested in\ndescribing aspects of space by involving interactions among groups of entities.\nIn this work, we propose a spatial logic interpreted on simplicial complexes.\nThese are topological objects, able to represent surfaces and volumes\nefficiently that generalise graphs with higher-order edges. We discuss how the\nsatisfaction of logical formulas can be verified by a correct and complete\nmodel checking algorithm, which is linear to the dimension of the simplicial\ncomplex and logical formula. The expressiveness of the proposed logic is\nstudied in terms of the spatial variants of classical bisimulation and\nbranching bisimulation relations defined over simplicial complexes.","PeriodicalId":49904,"journal":{"name":"Logical Methods in Computer Science","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Logical Methods in Computer Science","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46298/lmcs-19(3:8)2023","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Collective Adaptive Systems often consist of many heterogeneous components typically organised in groups. These entities interact with each other by adapting their behaviour to pursue individual or collective goals. In these systems, the distribution of these entities determines a space that can be either physical or logical. The former is defined in terms of a physical relation among components. The latter depends on logical relations, such as being part of the same group. In this context, specification and verification of spatial properties play a fundamental role in supporting the design of systems and predicting their behaviour. For this reason, different tools and techniques have been proposed to specify and verify the properties of space, mainly described as graphs. Therefore, the approaches generally use model spatial relations to describe a form of proximity among pairs of entities. Unfortunately, these graph-based models do not permit considering relations among more than two entities that may arise when one is interested in describing aspects of space by involving interactions among groups of entities. In this work, we propose a spatial logic interpreted on simplicial complexes. These are topological objects, able to represent surfaces and volumes efficiently that generalise graphs with higher-order edges. We discuss how the satisfaction of logical formulas can be verified by a correct and complete model checking algorithm, which is linear to the dimension of the simplicial complex and logical formula. The expressiveness of the proposed logic is studied in terms of the spatial variants of classical bisimulation and branching bisimulation relations defined over simplicial complexes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
简单模型的空间逻辑
集体适应系统通常由许多异质组件组成,通常以组的形式组织。这些实体通过调整自己的行为来追求个人或集体目标,从而相互作用。在这些系统中,这些实体的分布决定了一个空间可以是物理的,也可以是逻辑的。前者是根据组件之间的物理关系来定义的。后者取决于逻辑关系,例如属于同一组。在这种情况下,空间属性的规范和验证在支持系统设计和预测其行为方面起着基本作用。出于这个原因,人们提出了不同的工具和技术来指定和验证空间的性质,主要描述为图。因此,这些方法通常使用模型空间关系来描述实体对之间的接近形式。不幸的是,这些基于图的模型不允许考虑两个以上实体之间的关系,当人们对通过涉及实体组之间的相互作用来描述空间方面感兴趣时,可能会出现这种关系。在这项工作中,我们提出了一个简单复合体的空间逻辑解释。这些是拓扑对象,能够有效地表示具有高阶边的图形的表面和体积。我们讨论了如何用一种与简单、复杂和逻辑公式的维数成线性关系的正确、完备的模型检验算法来验证逻辑公式的满足性。根据在简单复合体上定义的经典双模拟和分支双模拟关系的空间变异,研究了所提出逻辑的可表达性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Logical Methods in Computer Science
Logical Methods in Computer Science 工程技术-计算机:理论方法
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
105
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Logical Methods in Computer Science is a fully refereed, open access, free, electronic journal. It welcomes papers on theoretical and practical areas in computer science involving logical methods, taken in a broad sense; some particular areas within its scope are listed below. Papers are refereed in the traditional way, with two or more referees per paper. Copyright is retained by the author. Topics of Logical Methods in Computer Science: Algebraic methods Automata and logic Automated deduction Categorical models and logic Coalgebraic methods Computability and Logic Computer-aided verification Concurrency theory Constraint programming Cyber-physical systems Database theory Defeasible reasoning Domain theory Emerging topics: Computational systems in biology Emerging topics: Quantum computation and logic Finite model theory Formalized mathematics Functional programming and lambda calculus Inductive logic and learning Interactive proof checking Logic and algorithms Logic and complexity Logic and games Logic and probability Logic for knowledge representation Logic programming Logics of programs Modal and temporal logics Program analysis and type checking Program development and specification Proof complexity Real time and hybrid systems Reasoning about actions and planning Satisfiability Security Semantics of programming languages Term rewriting and equational logic Type theory and constructive mathematics.
期刊最新文献
A categorical characterization of relative entropy on standard Borel spaces The Power-Set Construction for Tree Algebras Token Games and History-Deterministic Quantitative-Automata A coherent differential PCF Subgame-perfect Equilibria in Mean-payoff Games (journal version)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1