Comparative analysis of the tax wedge in Croatia and Slovenia from 2005 to 2020

IF 0.5 Q4 ECONOMICS Ekonomski Vjesnik Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.51680/ev.36.1.1
Sandra Krtalić, Paula Peruško
{"title":"Comparative analysis of the tax wedge in Croatia and Slovenia from 2005 to 2020","authors":"Sandra Krtalić, Paula Peruško","doi":"10.51680/ev.36.1.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Personal income tax (PIT) and social security contributions (SSC) play a significant role in tax systems. Since both of them affect employers and employees, it is important to analyse the labour costs paid by the employer (gross wage) and the net wage received by the employee, i.e., the tax wedge. Methodology: Following OECD’s Taxing Wages methodology, this paper analyses the characteristics of the tax wedge and the tax wedge policy in the Republic of Croatia and the Republic of Slovenia in the period from 2005 to 2020. Results: The conducted analysis has shown that a Slovenian taxpayer faces the highest average net tax wedge for each observed family type, and that the Croatian tax wedge is lower in all hypothetical units observed. The taxpayer with the highest average gross wage also faces the highest tax burden. The problem of a relatively high tax wedge in Croatia and Slovenia does not lie with the personal income tax, which is relatively low, but with social contributions. Conclusion: The tax wedge primarily depends on the level of income, it decreases if the taxpayer has (more) children, and its amount depends on various levels of tax, deductions and social security contributions. In the future, the focus will be on alleviating the labour tax burden. However, this begs the question of how to further alleviate the burden on labour without implementing major structural reforms in the pension and healthcare system and/or introducing new tax forms.","PeriodicalId":42693,"journal":{"name":"Ekonomski Vjesnik","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ekonomski Vjesnik","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51680/ev.36.1.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Personal income tax (PIT) and social security contributions (SSC) play a significant role in tax systems. Since both of them affect employers and employees, it is important to analyse the labour costs paid by the employer (gross wage) and the net wage received by the employee, i.e., the tax wedge. Methodology: Following OECD’s Taxing Wages methodology, this paper analyses the characteristics of the tax wedge and the tax wedge policy in the Republic of Croatia and the Republic of Slovenia in the period from 2005 to 2020. Results: The conducted analysis has shown that a Slovenian taxpayer faces the highest average net tax wedge for each observed family type, and that the Croatian tax wedge is lower in all hypothetical units observed. The taxpayer with the highest average gross wage also faces the highest tax burden. The problem of a relatively high tax wedge in Croatia and Slovenia does not lie with the personal income tax, which is relatively low, but with social contributions. Conclusion: The tax wedge primarily depends on the level of income, it decreases if the taxpayer has (more) children, and its amount depends on various levels of tax, deductions and social security contributions. In the future, the focus will be on alleviating the labour tax burden. However, this begs the question of how to further alleviate the burden on labour without implementing major structural reforms in the pension and healthcare system and/or introducing new tax forms.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2005 - 2020年克罗地亚和斯洛文尼亚税收楔子的比较分析
目的:个人所得税(PIT)和社会保障缴款(SSC)在税收制度中发挥着重要作用。由于两者都影响雇主和雇员,因此分析雇主支付的劳动力成本(总工资)和雇员获得的净工资(即税收楔子)非常重要。方法:遵循经合组织的税收工资方法,本文分析了2005年至2020年期间克罗地亚共和国和斯洛文尼亚共和国的税收楔子和税收楔子政策的特征。结果:所进行的分析表明,斯洛文尼亚纳税人面临的每个观察到的家庭类型的平均净税收楔子最高,克罗地亚的税收楔子在所有观察到的假设单位中都较低。平均总工资最高的纳税人也面临着最高的税负。克罗地亚和斯洛文尼亚相对较高的税收楔子的问题不在于相对较低的个人所得税,而在于社会缴款。结论:税收楔子主要取决于收入水平,如果纳税人有(多)个孩子,税收楔子会减小,其大小取决于各种税收水平、扣除和社会保障缴款。今后的重点是减轻劳动税负担。然而,这回避了一个问题,即如何在不实施养老金和医疗体系的重大结构性改革和/或引入新的税收形式的情况下进一步减轻劳动力的负担。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ekonomski Vjesnik
Ekonomski Vjesnik ECONOMICS-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The nexus between transparency reports and soft skills training in audit firms Implementation of currency interventions of the Central Bank of Armenia with financial derivatives What are the factors that determine risk-adjusted returns of Croatian life insurers? Corruption pressure on business revisited Resource-based economy – determinants of economic growth and sustainable development in Saudi Arabia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1