{"title":"Beltrami flow structure in a diffuser. Quasi-cylindrical approximation","authors":"R. Gonz'alez, R. Page, A. Sartarelli","doi":"10.4279/PIP.040002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We determine the flow structure in an axisymmetric diffuser or expansion region connecting two cylindrical pipes when the inlet flow is a solid body rotation with a uniform axial flow of speeds and U, respectively. A quasi-cylindrical approximation is made in order to solve the steady Euler equation, mainly the Bragg-Hawthorne equation. As in our previous work on the cylindrical region downstream [R Gonzalez et al., Phys. Fluids 20, 24106 (2008); R. Gonzalez et al., Phys. Fluids 22, 74102 (2010), R Gonzalez et al., J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 296, 012024 (2011)], the steady flow in the transition region shows a Beltrami flow structure. The Beltrami flow is defined as a field that satisfies , with . We say that the flow has a Beltrami flow structure when it can be put in the form , being U and constants, i.e it is the superposition of a solid body rotation and translation with a Beltrami one. Therefore, those findings about flow stability hold. The quasi-cylindrical solutions do not branch off and the results do not depend on the chosen transition profile in view of the boundary conditions considered. By comparing this with our earliest work, we relate the critical Rossby number (stagnation) to the corresponding one at the fold [J. D. Buntine et al., Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 449, 139 (1995)]. Received: 29 August 2011,, Accepted: 29 February 2012; Edited by: J-P. Hulin; DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4279/PIP.040002 Cite as: R Gonzalez, R Page, A S Sartarelli , Papers in Physics 4, 040002 (2012)","PeriodicalId":19791,"journal":{"name":"Papers in Physics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2012-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Papers in Physics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4279/PIP.040002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
We determine the flow structure in an axisymmetric diffuser or expansion region connecting two cylindrical pipes when the inlet flow is a solid body rotation with a uniform axial flow of speeds and U, respectively. A quasi-cylindrical approximation is made in order to solve the steady Euler equation, mainly the Bragg-Hawthorne equation. As in our previous work on the cylindrical region downstream [R Gonzalez et al., Phys. Fluids 20, 24106 (2008); R. Gonzalez et al., Phys. Fluids 22, 74102 (2010), R Gonzalez et al., J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 296, 012024 (2011)], the steady flow in the transition region shows a Beltrami flow structure. The Beltrami flow is defined as a field that satisfies , with . We say that the flow has a Beltrami flow structure when it can be put in the form , being U and constants, i.e it is the superposition of a solid body rotation and translation with a Beltrami one. Therefore, those findings about flow stability hold. The quasi-cylindrical solutions do not branch off and the results do not depend on the chosen transition profile in view of the boundary conditions considered. By comparing this with our earliest work, we relate the critical Rossby number (stagnation) to the corresponding one at the fold [J. D. Buntine et al., Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 449, 139 (1995)]. Received: 29 August 2011,, Accepted: 29 February 2012; Edited by: J-P. Hulin; DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4279/PIP.040002 Cite as: R Gonzalez, R Page, A S Sartarelli , Papers in Physics 4, 040002 (2012)
确定了进口流为匀速轴向流的固体旋转流时,轴对称扩压器或连接两圆柱管的膨胀区内的流动结构。为了求解稳定欧拉方程,主要是Bragg-Hawthorne方程,采用了准柱面近似。正如我们之前对下游圆柱形区域的研究[R Gonzalez et al., Phys]。流体20,24106 (2008);R. Gonzalez等人,物理学。流体力学学报,2009(4):559 - 564。[j] . Conf. Ser. 296, 012024(2011)],过渡区的稳定流表现为Beltrami流结构。Beltrami流被定义为满足的字段。我们说流具有贝尔特拉米流结构,当它可以表示为U和常数的形式时,即它是实体旋转和平移与贝尔特拉米流的叠加。因此,这些关于流动稳定性的发现是成立的。考虑到所考虑的边界条件,拟柱解不分叉,结果不依赖于所选择的过渡曲线。通过与我们最早的工作进行比较,我们将临界罗斯比数(停滞)与相应的褶皱数联系起来[J]。D. Buntine et al., Proc R. Soc。Lond。[A]; [c];收稿日期:2011年8月29日;收稿日期:2012年2月29日;编辑:J-P。Hulin;引用本文:R Gonzalez, R Page, A S Sartarelli, Papers in Physics 4, 040002 (2012)
期刊介绍:
Papers in Physics publishes original research in all areas of physics and its interface with other subjects. The scope includes, but is not limited to, physics of particles and fields, condensed matter, relativity and gravitation, nuclear physics, physics of fluids, biophysics, econophysics, chemical physics, statistical mechanics, soft condensed matter, materials science, mathematical physics and general physics. Contributions in the areas of foundations of physics, history of physics and physics education are not considered for publication. Articles published in Papers in Physics contain substantial new results and ideas that advance the state of physics in a non-trivial way. Articles are strictly reviewed by specialists prior to publication. Papers in Physics highlights outstanding articles published in the journal through the Editors'' choice section. Papers in Physics offers two distinct editorial treatments to articles from which authors can choose. In Traditional Review, manuscripts are submitted to anonymous reviewers seeking constructive criticism and editors make a decision on whether publication is appropriate. In Open Review, manuscripts are sent to reviewers. If the paper is considered original and technically sound, the article, the reviewer''s comments and the author''s reply are published alongside the names of all involved. This way, Papers in Physics promotes the open discussion of controversies among specialists that are of help to the reader and to the transparency of the editorial process. Moreover, our reviewers receive their due recognition by publishing a recorded citable report. Papers in Physics publishes Commentaries from the reviewer(s) if major disagreements remain after exchange with the authors or if a different insight proposed is considered valuable for the readers.