Control over biopower in cognitive and surveillance capitalism

Vesna Stanković-Pejnović
{"title":"Control over biopower in cognitive and surveillance capitalism","authors":"Vesna Stanković-Pejnović","doi":"10.5937/spm80-43934","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Biopower is a form of power that regulates social life from its interior, following it, interpreting it, absorbing it, and rearticulating it. Power can achieve an effective command over the entire life of the population only when it becomes an integral, vital function that every individual embraces and reactivates of his or her own accord. Biopower points out the moment when human life explicitly became part of the political calculations. Beyond the regime of sovereignty, oriented by a logic of repression, emerges a new regime, oriented by a logic of production and control, that is, a power \"to make live\" or \"to let die\". For Negri and Hardt biopower constitutes social relations, inserting individuals and populations in a circuit of value, obedience, and utility. In cognitive capitalism capital presents itself as biopower. The point is that capitalism is not only an economic mode of production, but also a mode of life production, a mode of subjectivation. Therefore, it is not only about the reproduction of capital, but also about the reproduction of subjects, the effective producers of economic value. We are facing with the tendency of capital's invasion of bios, the becomingof-capital-biopower, to introduce the concept of biocapitalism. However, it is in this context that biopower and biopolitics must be seen as working together with other technologies of power - repressive and disciplinary power - which operate more directly on the body and on subjectivity. To the new forms of conflict are linked with new forms of power: from cognitive warfare to sharp power. Through cognitive conflict and sharp power strategies, we are witnessing an epochal change, an IT revolution that brings political conflict into a digital dimension, which acts on the ground of public opinion, politics and economics, control and conditioning of knowledge, of our world view and of facts. Zuboff introduces the concept of surveillance-based capitalism implemented via sophisticated algorithms of BigTech companies (Google, Apple, Amazon, Meta, and others). Digital networks do not only collect data on users, but they \"cluster\" these users with the help of algorithms and encourage specific desired behaviors. Then, the patterns of these behaviors are stored (as raw material of a kind) in Big Data and sold further as commodity (behavioral surplus) on the market. A persons \"digital behavior\" thus becomes a market subject in various ways. It is ubiquitous, sensate, computational, and global and it is designed so that all human activity, from the most banal to the boldest, can be monitored, measured, and modified for the purposes of surveillance capitalism This capacity to \"shape human behavior\", gives rise to what Zuboff calls \"instrumentarian power\" This is not dissimilar to forms of governmentality described by Foucault, because its goal is not just the \"conduct of conduct\" rather it is to turn people themselves into highly predictable instruments of political or material consumption. As a new form of subtle and sophisticated despotism, data are used by agencies as predictive products about our future behaviors, information that allows to control a market, but also the space for political decision-making and legitimacy, and, therefore become a huge power. Predictive behavioral surplus sources are increased and enhanced to guide, advise and lead people to behaviors, which they believe free, which actually aim for the greater profit of surveillance capitalists.","PeriodicalId":34288,"journal":{"name":"Srpska Politicka Misao","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Srpska Politicka Misao","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5937/spm80-43934","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Biopower is a form of power that regulates social life from its interior, following it, interpreting it, absorbing it, and rearticulating it. Power can achieve an effective command over the entire life of the population only when it becomes an integral, vital function that every individual embraces and reactivates of his or her own accord. Biopower points out the moment when human life explicitly became part of the political calculations. Beyond the regime of sovereignty, oriented by a logic of repression, emerges a new regime, oriented by a logic of production and control, that is, a power "to make live" or "to let die". For Negri and Hardt biopower constitutes social relations, inserting individuals and populations in a circuit of value, obedience, and utility. In cognitive capitalism capital presents itself as biopower. The point is that capitalism is not only an economic mode of production, but also a mode of life production, a mode of subjectivation. Therefore, it is not only about the reproduction of capital, but also about the reproduction of subjects, the effective producers of economic value. We are facing with the tendency of capital's invasion of bios, the becomingof-capital-biopower, to introduce the concept of biocapitalism. However, it is in this context that biopower and biopolitics must be seen as working together with other technologies of power - repressive and disciplinary power - which operate more directly on the body and on subjectivity. To the new forms of conflict are linked with new forms of power: from cognitive warfare to sharp power. Through cognitive conflict and sharp power strategies, we are witnessing an epochal change, an IT revolution that brings political conflict into a digital dimension, which acts on the ground of public opinion, politics and economics, control and conditioning of knowledge, of our world view and of facts. Zuboff introduces the concept of surveillance-based capitalism implemented via sophisticated algorithms of BigTech companies (Google, Apple, Amazon, Meta, and others). Digital networks do not only collect data on users, but they "cluster" these users with the help of algorithms and encourage specific desired behaviors. Then, the patterns of these behaviors are stored (as raw material of a kind) in Big Data and sold further as commodity (behavioral surplus) on the market. A persons "digital behavior" thus becomes a market subject in various ways. It is ubiquitous, sensate, computational, and global and it is designed so that all human activity, from the most banal to the boldest, can be monitored, measured, and modified for the purposes of surveillance capitalism This capacity to "shape human behavior", gives rise to what Zuboff calls "instrumentarian power" This is not dissimilar to forms of governmentality described by Foucault, because its goal is not just the "conduct of conduct" rather it is to turn people themselves into highly predictable instruments of political or material consumption. As a new form of subtle and sophisticated despotism, data are used by agencies as predictive products about our future behaviors, information that allows to control a market, but also the space for political decision-making and legitimacy, and, therefore become a huge power. Predictive behavioral surplus sources are increased and enhanced to guide, advise and lead people to behaviors, which they believe free, which actually aim for the greater profit of surveillance capitalists.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
认知资本主义和监视资本主义对生物权力的控制
生物权力是一种从内部调节社会生活的权力形式,它遵循它,解释它,吸收它,并重新表达它。只有当权力成为每个人自愿接受和重新激活的一种不可或缺的、至关重要的功能时,权力才能有效地控制人民的整个生活。《生物能源》指出了人类生命明确成为政治考量一部分的时刻。在以镇压逻辑为导向的主权政权之外,出现了一种以生产和控制逻辑为导向的新政权,即一种“生”或“死”的权力。内格里和哈特认为,生物权力构成了社会关系,将个人和群体插入到价值、服从和效用的循环中。在认知资本主义中,资本表现为生命力量。关键在于,资本主义不仅是一种经济生产方式,也是一种生活生产方式,一种主体化方式。因此,它不仅涉及资本的再生产,而且涉及主体的再生产,即经济价值的有效生产者。面对资本入侵生物的趋势,面对资本-生物力量的形成,我们引入了生物资本主义的概念。然而,正是在这种背景下,生命权力和生命政治必须被视为与其他权力技术——压制性和惩戒性权力——一起工作,后者更直接地作用于身体和主体性。新形式的冲突与新形式的力量相联系:从认知战到锐实力。通过认知冲突和锐实力战略,我们正在见证一场划时代的变革,一场将政治冲突带入数字维度的IT革命,它在公众舆论、政治和经济、知识的控制和制约、我们的世界观和事实的基础上发挥作用。Zuboff介绍了通过大型科技公司(b谷歌、苹果、亚马逊、Meta等)的复杂算法实现的基于监控的资本主义的概念。数字网络不仅收集用户数据,还借助算法将这些用户“聚类”,并鼓励特定的期望行为。然后,这些行为的模式被存储(作为一种原材料)在大数据中,并作为商品(行为盈余)在市场上进一步出售。一个人的“数字行为”因此以各种方式成为市场主体。它是无所不在的、感知的、计算的和全球性的,它的设计目的是为了监视资本主义的目的,所有的人类活动,从最平庸的到最大胆的,都可以被监视、测量和修改。这种“塑造人类行为”的能力,产生了祖伯夫所说的“工具权力”。因为它的目标不仅仅是“行为的行为”,而是把人们自己变成高度可预测的政治或物质消费工具。作为一种微妙而复杂的专制新形式,数据被机构用作预测我们未来行为的产品,可以用来控制市场的信息,也是政治决策和合法性的空间,因此成为一种巨大的力量。预测性行为盈余来源被增加和增强,以引导、建议和引导人们做出他们认为是自由的行为,而这些行为实际上是为了监控资本家获得更大的利润。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
92
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Local elections in the Republic of Serbia 2016 and 2020: Political consequences of lowering the electoral threshold Russia's position in the multipolar world and Serbia's strategic options Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on violent extremism and organized crime in the Republic of Serbia Između institucionalizacije i uzajamnog uništenja - Kostić-Šulejić Marina: Strateška stabilnost u multipolarnom svetu, Institut za međunarodnu politiku i privredu, Beograd, 2022 Sociocultural conceptualization of fear
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1