Differences in Energy Expenditure and Typing Speed While Sitting, Standing, and Walking in College Students

F. Miller, Avniel Barrow, A. Perez, Yenly Londono Calle
{"title":"Differences in Energy Expenditure and Typing Speed While Sitting, Standing, and Walking in College Students","authors":"F. Miller, Avniel Barrow, A. Perez, Yenly Londono Calle","doi":"10.53520/jen2021.103107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The purpose of this study was to determine if caloric expenditure and typing speed differed among three positions (sitting, standing, walking). Methods:  Participants included 40 college students (18-22 years, 30 males and 10 females) on either the baseball or track and field teams. Each participant was tested for 5 minutes in three different positions. Caloric expenditure was measured via indirect calorimetry and typing productivity via a 3-minute typing test. Repeated measures ANOVAs and T-Tests were performed to determine statistical differences for caloric expenditure and typing speed. Results: Caloric expenditure (calories per 5 minutes) was significantly higher for walking (16.4 ± 3.1) than for sitting (9.0 ± 2.4, p <0.0001) and standing (9.4 ± 2.0, p <0.0001). For typing productivity, standing resulted in faster typing speed than walking (37.4 ± 10.2 vs. 34.7 ± 10.7 wpm, p = 0096). Conclusions: Using a standup walking desk to type while working expends significantly more calories than typing while sitting or standing at a desk. However, typing speed was significantly higher while standing at a desk than while walking at a desk.","PeriodicalId":73743,"journal":{"name":"Journal of exercise and nutrition","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of exercise and nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53520/jen2021.103107","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The purpose of this study was to determine if caloric expenditure and typing speed differed among three positions (sitting, standing, walking). Methods:  Participants included 40 college students (18-22 years, 30 males and 10 females) on either the baseball or track and field teams. Each participant was tested for 5 minutes in three different positions. Caloric expenditure was measured via indirect calorimetry and typing productivity via a 3-minute typing test. Repeated measures ANOVAs and T-Tests were performed to determine statistical differences for caloric expenditure and typing speed. Results: Caloric expenditure (calories per 5 minutes) was significantly higher for walking (16.4 ± 3.1) than for sitting (9.0 ± 2.4, p <0.0001) and standing (9.4 ± 2.0, p <0.0001). For typing productivity, standing resulted in faster typing speed than walking (37.4 ± 10.2 vs. 34.7 ± 10.7 wpm, p = 0096). Conclusions: Using a standup walking desk to type while working expends significantly more calories than typing while sitting or standing at a desk. However, typing speed was significantly higher while standing at a desk than while walking at a desk.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大学生坐、站、走时能量消耗和打字速度的差异
本研究的目的是确定三种姿势(坐着,站着,走着)的热量消耗和打字速度是否不同。方法:选取棒球队和田径队的大学生40名,年龄18-22岁,男30名,女10名。每个参与者在三种不同的姿势上接受了5分钟的测试。通过间接量热法测量热量消耗,通过3分钟打字测试测量打字效率。采用重复测量方差分析和t检验来确定热量消耗和打字速度的统计差异。结果:步行时的热量消耗(每5分钟卡路里)(16.4±3.1)明显高于坐着时(9.0±2.4,p <0.0001)和站立时(9.4±2.0,p <0.0001)。在打字效率方面,站立打字速度比步行快(37.4±10.2 vs. 34.7±10.7,p = 0096)。结论:在工作时使用站立式移动办公桌打字比坐在或站在办公桌前打字消耗的卡路里多得多。然而,站着打字的速度比走着打字的速度要快得多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Impact of MCT Oil and Caffeine on Substrate Metabolism during Submaximal Exercise Body Composition as a Predictor of Performance on the Army Combat Fitness Test Total Score for ROTC Cadets Eating Habits as a Predictor of Performance on the Army Combat Fitness Test Total Score for ROTC Cadets The Effects of a Multi-Ingredient Pre-Workout Supplement on Repeated Sprint Ability: A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled, Crossover Study Perspectives of Health and Eating Behaviors in Marathon and Half-Marathoners
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1